J
JimG
Guest
I’m not sure why members of a Catholic teachers’ union would object to acting and teaching in accord with Catholic morality.
I’m not so sure Jim. Yesterday on Catholic Answers Live, Father Mitch Pacwa got a call from a woman who said that her children were being taught among other things, that the Assumption and the Immaculate Conception were nothing more than complete myths. It was a disturbing call to hear from this mother. If doctrine is being dismissed willy-nilly, I find it hard to believe that Catholic morality would rank high with them. My question to Father Mitch would have been; Why are such people allowed to continue teaching in a Catholic School? The Assumption of Our Lady and her Immaculate Conception just myths? I wonder what they’re taught about the Eucharist? And we wonder why so many Catholics simply dismiss so many teachings of the faith. Something has gone horribly wrong here! And the damage being done to these children being taught this dribble is beyond one’s comprehension. It’s as if acid were being poured on their souls.I’m not sure why members of a Catholic teachers’ union would object to acting and teaching in accord with Catholic morality.
Catholic schools have come to mean “Catholic flavored” here and it has become accepted by the majority. His Excellency means to fix that, but it’s bound to ruffle feathers.I’m not sure why members of a Catholic teachers’ union would object to acting and teaching in accord with Catholic morality.
Wow, I’m always rather amazed to hear stories like this. If Catholic schools can’t teach Catholicism, both doctrine and morals, they are nothing more than private schools with a misleading label.I’m not so sure Jim. Yesterday on Catholic Answers Live, Father Mitch Pacwa got a call from a woman who said that her children were being taught among other things, that the Assumption and the Immaculate Conception were nothing more than complete myths. It was a disturbing call to hear from this mother. If doctrine is being dismissed willy-nilly, I find it hard to believe that Catholic morality would rank high with them. My question to Father Mitch would have been; Why are such people allowed to continue teaching in a Catholic School? The Assumption of Our Lady and her Immaculate Conception just myths? I wonder what they’re taught about the Eucharist? And we wonder why so many Catholics simply dismiss so many teachings of the faith. Something has gone horribly wrong here! And the damage being done to these children being taught this dribble is beyond one’s comprehension. It’s as if acid were being poured on their souls.
Peace, Mark
Well, maybe in Kansas… but this is a little bit closer to Sodom and Gomorrah…I’m not sure why members of a Catholic teachers’ union would object to acting and teaching in accord with Catholic morality.
HehWell, maybe in Kansas… but this is a little bit closer to Sodom and Gomorrah…![]()
Well, no guts, no glory.I have no idea whether there is an existing morality clause or not. All I am saying is that any new language, even just language of clarification,*** must be agreed to in collective bargaining ***and I would be surprised if the union would support it.
Lord embrace and protect this, your faithful and courageous shepherd, and may his action be the impetus for others to follow! Surely the storm to come will be most unpleasant.



Yes, he needs all of our PRAYERS!!! Just look at the rating of the thread, it was a 5 star thread, and has been downgraded, in a Catholic forum of all places… What can we expect to happen in San Francisco & in the rest of the country
It is definitely the Valley of Tears! ****How can a practicing Catholic think that what His Excellency is doing is wrong ??? ****:banghead:
I cannot believe that His Excellency has to state the obvious, the TRUTH!
BRAVO
You are absolutely correct, Megan. It is an embarrassment that a holy Archbishop, faithful to the Church cannot be supported and encouraged by Catholics.![]()
Is there any language in the handbook regarding driving under the influence? Wouldn’t that reflect badly on the church as well?see sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2015/02/04/san-francisco-archbishop-salvatore-cordileone-to-add-statements-on-sexual-morality-in-faculty-handbook-proposes-adding-clauses-to-teachers-contract-gay-sex-adultery-masturbation-porn/
The Archdiocese of San Francisco is adding detailed statements on sexual morality to the faculty and staff handbooks of four diocesan handbooks and is proposing adding such statements to the teachers contracts there. Archdiocesan officials say this calls upon teachers there “to avoid fostering confusion among the faithful and any dilution of the schools’ Catholic mission.” Those at these schools are to avoid publicly challenging the Church’s positions on such issues, some of which are in the forefront, like gay marriage and abortion.
The people who adhere to the rules are all sinners. It’s when they betray trust that make their position untenable and then go on to modify church teaching to suit their foibles. That’s the problem. Also the Archbishop’s actions did not directly effect any one else. He admitted his guilt and was contrite.Is there any language in the handbook regarding driving under the influence? Wouldn’t that reflect badly on the church as well?
Wow, you really went there, didn’t you?Is there any language in the handbook regarding driving under the influence? Wouldn’t that reflect badly on the church as well?
First impressions are important, are they not?Wow, you really went there, didn’t you?
Haven’t responded to my post and it’s noticeable…First impressions are important, are they not?
And certain actions have much more grave consequences than others. Someone masturbating in private does no harm to anyone else. Drunk drivers often kill innocent people.
Please understand the nature of a forum. It’s much different than a one-on-one conversation. Not every post is replied to. As a courtesy I re-read your earlier post, and it did not answer the initial question I posed. So there’s nothing that warranted a reply.Haven’t responded to my post and it’s noticeable…
Yes. It did actually. It answered your hint at hypocrisy of an individual.Please understand the nature of a forum. It’s much different than a one-on-one conversation. Not every post is replied to. As a courtesy I re-read your earlier post, and it did not answer the initial question I posed. So there’s nothing that warranted a reply.