"German bishop quits synodal forum endorsing 'polyvalent sexuality'"

  • Thread starter Thread starter IanM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s about time, and hopefully more bishops follow suit. The few orthodox bishops that there are in Germany should not give this synod the appearance of legitimacy by participating. It is obvious to anyone who has been paying attention what they are trying to do with it.
 
Imma add it to my ever growing list of vocabulary words.
 
Chemistry language is cool these days. (Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
Trans-, cis-, now polyvalent.
Now lets make isomerism and titrate cool too. (Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Y’all are making me laugh; bad idea while I’m eating breakfast.

I googled “polyvalent sexuality,” and I still don’t know what that phrase means. However, I suspect that it’s just another way of saying that it’s okay to be naughty, which I don’t buy at all.

D
 
Yes basically the idea that sex has numerous functions and forms. It’s basically leading down the path to concluding that the main function of sex isn’t procreation. That is why the bishop who left said ‘the forum was trying to cast into doubt fundamental teachings of the Catholic Church on sexual morality’.
 
DaveBj said:
Y’all are making me laugh; bad idea while I’m eating breakfast.

I googled “polyvalent sexuality,” and I still don’t know what that phrase means. However, I suspect that it’s just another way of saying that it’s okay to be naughty, which I don’t buy at all.

D
Click to expand...
Many years ago I attended a debate to allow Kansas to sell “liquor by the drink”. At that time, you had to be a member of a club in order to buy alcohol. A lawyer was advocating for restaurants and bars to be able to sell alcohol without a membership. An evangelical minister was opposed. The minister went on a very long monologue to argue against liquor by the drink…he was using all kinds of big words, unusual phrases, etc. I was a student at the time, but didn’t want to ask clarifying questions, because I didn’t want people to think I was stupid for not understanding the minister. The lawyer got his turn and replied, “I have no idea what you just said!”

The moral of the story is that when people use uncommon words, overly technical terms, etc., in a public setting, they are hiding something! They don’t want to debate the true merits of what is at stake…they create diversions. Just like the term “polyvalent sexuality”.
 
Only a binary square like yourself wouldn’t get it… man and woman, he and she… how antiquated!

(I joke).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top