Getting Married Young

  • Thread starter Thread starter nodito
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’ll take that as a tacit admission.
A tacit admission of what? If you’re implying an admission of abusing NFP then you are EXTREMELY out of line. How in the world could you make a judgement like that out of only two facts: they married young, and had two children. I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt here and hoping that is not what you meant.
 
One can also fulfill his call to self-giving love through single life. Read Christopher West’s “Good News About Sex and Marriage” for more information on this point.
She didn’t say you couldn’t.
I guess you just don’t have the same life experience I do to see so many Catholic girls making bad choices in partners through impatience - guys that aren’t Catholic, guys that aren’t Christian, guys who “put on a good show” but aren’t really there spiritually, guys with addictions to alcohol, etc.
I keep reading your posts about “Catholic girls”, I’m hoping this alludes to your own dating experience and not to a belief that women have more of a “desparation complex” than men?
Plus, I know a lot of girls who either tell themselves or honestly believe that their friends who are in such and such relationship is good and make a poor judgment in the process. Women have that ability to fool themselves into thinking all kinds of crazy things. See Dr. Laura Schlessinger’s book “10 Stupid Things Women Do To Mess Up Their Lives” for more information on that point.
Right now I’d like you to imagine yourself standing in front of the Blessed Virgin and Jesus, saying this to them. What do you think they would’ve thought of that blanket statement?

And now you’re quoting Dr. Laura, are you kidding me? Although, you’re argumentative styles are starting to seem more and more similar, so maybe it shouldn’t surprise me.
Either you just haven’t lived long enough to see this, or the people in your circle have it all together unlike I’ve ever seen anywhere else. Can you send me some of that water you people are drinking?
You can copy this post to yourself when people again start “misreading” you as you so like to claim.
 
One can also fulfill his call to self-giving love through single life. Read Christopher West’s “Good News About Sex and Marriage” for more information on this point.
I said exactly this. I know many committed, lay single people who serve God and give of themselves in a variety of ways.
I guess you just don’t have the same life experience I do to see so many Catholic girls making bad choices in partners through impatience - guys that aren’t Catholic, guys that aren’t Christian, guys who “put on a good show” but aren’t really there spiritually, guys with addictions to alcohol, etc.
I’m not denying that this can be a problem, I’m just saying that given the statistics on marriage in the US–and even marriage in the Church in the US–this isn’t really the problem. The problem is that many, many people, Catholics included, are simply waiting much too long to ‘settle down,’ grow up and get married. They are shacking up for long periods of time, gallivanting around with multiple sexual partners, dating with no clear idea of the end of marriage in mind…we don’t need to be advising many of these people to keep on waiting. Instead, we need to catechize them well, help them to mature in their faith, and explain the true dignity of the vocation of marriage in the hopes that they will turn their hearts and lives towards it. Your point about needing to dedicate ourselves to God *in patience *is well-taken; you simply have no evidence to judge whether or not *I personally *have done so.
Plus, I know a lot of girls who either tell themselves or honestly believe that their friends who are in such and such relationship is good and make a poor judgment in the process. Women have that ability to fool themselves into thinking all kinds of crazy things. See Dr. Laura Schlessinger’s book “10 Stupid Things Women Do To Mess Up Their Lives” for more information on that point.
Um, I don’t usually go to Dr. Laura for advice…but I understand where you are going with this. Like I said, your point is well taken, but you are not really in the position to judge others’ processes of discernment, unless you are the priest counseling a couple preparing for marriage.
Either you just haven’t lived long enough to see this, or the people in your circle have it all together unlike I’ve ever seen anywhere else. Can you send me some of that water you people are drinking?
My friends are mostly in their early 20s–not really the point of desperation just yet. Those who are marrying realize the challenges ahead of them, and they are certainly not leaping into the adventure of marriage without adequate foresight.
 
My friends are mostly in their early 20s–not really the point of desperation just yet. Those who are marrying realize the challenges ahead of them, and they are certainly not leaping into the adventure of marriage without adequate foresight.
Not true. I have known teenagers who are “desperate”. Desperation is really not an age-specific thing.

More like an inability to be happily single and content in remaining in that state for any period of time whatsoever.
 
I keep reading your posts about “Catholic girls”, I’m hoping this alludes to your own dating experience and not to a belief that women have more of a “desparation complex” than men?

Right now I’d like you to imagine yourself standing in front of the Blessed Virgin and Jesus, saying this to them. What do you think they would’ve thought of that blanket statement?

You can copy this post to yourself when people again start “misreading” you as you so like to claim.
Statement #1: Actually, I have never dated.

Statement #2: I actually express this frustration to Jesus in my personal prayer. I always tell the Lord, look Lord, you made me a very blunt man, and you have also called me to an authentic relationship with you. Well if that is the case, I am going to have to speak boldly to you too. But really, women do have that ability - but it was not a “blanket statement” - I know a lot of women who do NOT allow their emotional side to dominate.

Statement #3: Actually, you have interpreted me quite accurately here. But no doubt about it, a lot of people were misconstruing me earlier.
 
My friends are mostly in their early 20s–not really the point of desperation just yet. Those who are marrying realize the challenges ahead of them, and they are certainly not leaping into the adventure of marriage without adequate foresight.
But do most of them consider single life something undesirable to them, and a state they would not want to spend much time in because they think it is a life of loneliness and sorrow?

I know you will counter with “well they are called to it”. Maybe so, maybe not. But the fact is, ALL CATHOLICS must see the BEAUTY in all vocations and be TOTALLY OPEN and RESIGNED to the idea that if God called them to ANY THREE of those vocations (single, married, consecrated celibate), they would embrace it with joy. The Catholic singer Janelle makes a good point that before she was truly ready for marriage, she had to get to a point where she was totally open and willing to follow any three of those vocations.

I know girls who only see the beauty in marriage (or only see beauty in seeing themselves married and not in the other vocations) and would rebel against God if he called them to be single. Maybe your friends are the exceptions - but most of the girls I have run into have this mentality. And most of the men too in case you think I’m being “sexist”.
 
Statement #1: Actually, I have never dated.

Statement #2: I actually express this frustration to Jesus in my personal prayer. I always tell the Lord, look Lord, you made me a very blunt man, and you have also called me to an authentic relationship with you. Well if that is the case, I am going to have to speak boldly to you too. But really, women do have that ability - but it was not a “blanket statement” - I know a lot of women who do NOT allow their emotional side to dominate.

Statement #3: Actually, you have interpreted me quite accurately here. But no doubt about it, a lot of people were misconstruing me earlier.
Again, no problem with any of your actual beliefs, just some of your opinions (and quick, and maybe unfounded, conclusions).

You’re like a roller coaster, one second you’ve got me, the next you have me wanting to put you in time out with my one year old.

And seriously, Dr. Laura?
 
But do most of them consider single life something undesirable to them, and a state they would not want to spend much time in because they think it is a life of loneliness and sorrow?
It’s possible, but why have to put the “most of them” on there? Why not just say, “some do think like this”, that way you’re not “read” to be assuming things of others.
I know you will counter with “well they are called to it”. Maybe so, maybe not. But the fact is, ALL CATHOLICS must see the BEAUTY in all vocations and be TOTALLY OPEN and RESIGNED to the idea that if God called them to ANY THREE of those vocations (single, married, consecrated celibate), they would embrace it with joy. The Catholic singer Janelle makes a good point that before she was truly ready for marriage, she had to get to a point where she was totally open and willing to follow any three of those vocations.
This is something I had to do, and my marriage did not come until after. But here, you’re talking about a truth we all know to be true, and not judging “most of” the people out there who succumb to the human weakness of it. Yet you’re still upholding, publicly, the truth. See, it can be done.
I know girls who only see the beauty in marriage and would rebel against God if he called them to be single. Maybe your friends are the exceptions - but most of the girls I have run into have this mentality. And most of the men too in case you think I’m being “sexist”.
Add a “and I might have too at one time”, which I think you said you had, and you would take most of the “bite” out of this. “I did it too, we all do in one way or another, but the good news is it can be overcome.” Include some encouragement along with the criticism, and it will become constructive!

And, at the same time, I give you permission to judge me for being condescending a slight bit patronizing :rolleyes: .
 
And seriously, Dr. Laura?
Her opinions on things are right on the money (I believe).

Her way of saying things, on the other hand - I suppose she could be a bit less abrasive.

And I think the reason so many are offended by her is not because of how she says things, but because she has opinions on relationships and family life that do not correspond to many people’s practices, and they resent it. She disapproves of day cares, so people who put their kids there hate her. She thinks men who can’t stand up to their mothers make bad husbands, so women who have married such men think she is a witch with a capital B.

Perhaps I could learn to say things in a nicer way as well. I am not sure.

One more thing - if you put me in a “time out” with your 1-year old, wouldn’t it no longer be a timeout at that point?
 
Statement #1: Actually, I have never dated.
For someone so completely unversed in dating, you do toss out an inordinate amount of advice on the subject.
Statement #2: I actually express this frustration to Jesus in my personal prayer. I always tell the Lord, look Lord, you made me a very blunt man, and you have also called me to an authentic relationship with you. Well if that is the case, I am going to have to speak boldly to you too. But really, women do have that ability - but it was not a “blanket statement” - I know a lot of women who do NOT allow their emotional side to dominate.
Don’t give the Lord a bad rap for making you “a very blunt man;” I think you can take credit for that all by yourself.
 
It’s possible, but why have to put the “most of them” on there? Why not just say, “some do think like this”, that way you’re not “read” to be assuming things of others.

This is something I had to do, and my marriage did not come until after. But here, you’re talking about a truth we all know to be true, and not judging “most of” the people out there who succumb to the human weakness of it. Yet you’re still upholding, publicly, the truth. See, it can be done.

Add a “and I might have too at one time”, which I think you said you had, and you would take most of the “bite” out of this. “I did it too, we all do in one way or another, but the good news is it can be overcome.” Include some encouragement along with the criticism, and it will become constructive!

And, at the same time, I give you permission to judge me for being condescending a slight bit patronizing :rolleyes: .
WOW! This was a really impressive post by you! I agree with it all, actually.
  1. Yes, I should use the term “some” rather than the term “most” much more often.
  2. Pointing out my own failures and keeping in mind my own sinfulness and imperfections is I think a good idea, keeps one’s pride in check, and puts a lot of things in perspective.
  3. I am a big believer in balancing criticism with praise. Yes, you are correct on this point.
  4. “Condescending” and “Patronizing” - I would be a hypocrite if I accused you of this.😉
 
For someone so completely unversed in dating, you do toss out an inordinate amount of advice on the subject.

Don’t give the Lord a bad rap for making you “a very blunt man;” I think you can take credit for that all by yourself.
Statement #1: Actually, I know a lot of priests that have never dated and made great marriage counselors and “toss out an inordinate amount of advice on the subject” as well. Never having “dated” does not make you “unversed” in dating. How else can a teacher who has never been to Europe teach British history? You have to be careful that you do not make a statement just to diss me that will also end up dissing good priests when you sweep with your broad brush.

Statement #2: Actually, it is called the “Choleric Temerament”. Did you know that all of us are born with one of four God-given temperaments? Read up on that - there’s a good article on Wikipedia about it, and another online source with a teacher’s notes who teaches, if I remember correctly, at the Catholic Angelicum (in Rome).
 
Her opinions on things are right on the money (I believe).
Some of them, yes. Is she Catholic, by the way?
Her way of saying things, on the other hand - I suppose she could be a bit less abrasive.
You think?
And I think the reason so many are offended by her is not because of how she says things, but because she has opinions on relationships and family life that do not correspond to many people’s practices, and they resent it. She disapproves of day cares, so people who put their kids there hate her. She thinks men who can’t stand up to their mothers make bad husbands, so women who have married such men think she is a witch with a capital B.
I think it’s a combination of both. I tend to agree with her principles, but I think she turns far more people off of the truth with her demeanor than those that she reaches, therefore cancelling herself out, so to speak.
Perhaps I could learn to say things in a nicer way as well. I am not sure.
That’s up to you.
One more thing - if you put me in a “time out” with your 1-year old, wouldn’t it no longer be a timeout at that point?
Not for him. YOU would get pretty sick of saying “ball” and “hi” ten thousand times though.
 
WOW! This was a really impressive post by you! I agree with it all, actually.
  1. Yes, I should use the term “some” rather than the term “most” much more often.
  2. Pointing out my own failures and keeping in mind my own sinfulness and imperfections is I think a good idea, keeps one’s pride in check, and puts a lot of things in perspective.
  3. I am a big believer in balancing criticism with praise. Yes, you are correct on this point.
  4. “Condescending” and “Patronizing” - I would be a hypocrite if I accused you of this.😉
Isn’t there a saying along the lines of “we find most fault in the people that display our own shortcomings” or something?

Thanks, by the way. 🙂
 
Isn’t there a saying along the lines of “we find most fault in the people that display our own shortcomings” or something?
May I ask - how do you think this applies to me? It is not a rhetorical question, I am actually curious.
 
Some of them, yes. Is she Catholic, by the way?
No, but she thinks like one, and she’s pretty hard on Catholics who call in saying they don’t accept the Church’s teachings on ABC and thus refuse to live by it.
 
Statement #1: Actually, I know a lot of priests that have never dated and made great marriage counselors and “toss out an inordinate amount of advice on the subject” as well. Never having “dated” does not make you “unversed” in dating. How else can a teacher who has never been to Europe teach British history? You have to be careful that you do not make a statement just to diss me that will also end up dissing good priests when you sweep with your broad brush.
When you’re a priest or a marriage counselor I will take your pronouncements more seriously, perhaps.

Seems you’ve been pretty efficient with a “broad brush”, if I recall.
Statement #2: Actually, it is called the “Choleric Temerament”. Did you know that all of us are born with one of four God-given temperaments? Read up on that - there’s a good article on Wikipedia about it, and another online source with a teacher’s notes who teaches, if I remember correctly, at the Catholic Angelicum (in Rome).
I am well aware of the “Four Temperaments”, though I don’t regard Wikipedia as a reliable source for anything; I learned about them in psychology classes at my Jesuit university.

I was being sarcastic, Michael.
 
Code:
Quote:
 	 		 			 				 					Originally Posted by **dixieagle** 					[forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif](http://forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=3588826#post3588826) 				
			*The reasons we "only had two children" are none of your business.*
I’ll take that as a tacit admission.
Michael - a tacit admission to what? Secondary infertility, the use of NFP for good reasons? What? I only have two living children - you know sometimes it is too painful for us moms especially to mention those we lost or the reasons we use NFP to avoid and quite frankly unless you are in one of those situations and need guidance specifically for that there is absolutely, positively no reason you need to know!

Sorry for hijacking the thread on marrying young - to get back on topic, I married young (was 20, he was 23) and am approaching our 30th wedding anniversary.

Brenda V.
 
But do most of them consider single life something undesirable to them, and a state they would not want to spend much time in because they think it is a life of loneliness and sorrow?
I have not heard nor seen that sentiment expressed among my friends who are soon marrying. I just haven’t. If you want to go and say that they probably feel that way and I just don’t know it, then I guess that’s your way of winning the argument. 🤷
Maybe so, maybe not. But the fact is, ALL CATHOLICS must see the BEAUTY in all vocations and be TOTALLY OPEN and RESIGNED to the idea that if God called them to ANY THREE of those vocations (single, married, consecrated celibate), they would embrace it with joy. The Catholic singer Janelle makes a good point that before she was truly ready for marriage, she had to get to a point where she was totally open and willing to follow any three of those vocations.
Of course! A good Catholic young man or woman won’t leap into marriage before seriously considering the ‘alternatives’. Two of my friends were each dead set on entering the priesthood and the religious life…until they met one another and prayerfully discerned their vocation to marriage. They did so under the spiritual direction of holy priests and after much discernment. It’s just where their path has taken them, and it’s not at all your place to judge their discernment process.

I do not understand why you feel the need to assume the worst of people. The worst of parents, who couldn’t ever wish to provide for their children’s benefit but must just be ‘spoiling’ them by paying their tuition. The worst of young people who feel called to marriage, who must just be leaping into their vocation out of desperation and a need to ‘escape’ the single life which they feel is a burden. The worst of married couples with children who “didn’t have enough” in your book, and therefore must have used ABC. I’m sorry–but who do you think you are?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top