My Goddaughter this year will ask me to buy her Girl Scout cookies. Have the bishops responded to their inquiry?
I’d like to know that too. But I almost feel bad posting in that this awful headline shows up again.
On post #20 and #23 of this thread (not knowing the rules then) I was asking CAF to consider changing this (rather misleading and suspicious sounding) headline to something that referenced its the GSAs grown up leadership and aspects that contradict Catholic teaching (sometimes on parish grounds or with Catholic troops) that is under scrutiny.
*Regarding how important headlines are in perception - and how misleading they can be (like this one) - I repasted this initial article (the one in post one no longer works) below. Note how different the story is from the headline.
*
Here is a pretty fairly written and interesting article with a horribly misleading headline IMO - still being discussed on this site.
news.yahoo.com/girl-scouts-under-scrutiny-catholic-bishops-181843252.html
If one reads JUST the headline (and some will) … there’s almost less clarity about what is going on than not knowing anything. Similar to my observations per the Dublin March … here are some of possible launch points a reader might proceed from the Girl Scout/Bishops headline:
– “Why are the Bishops scrutinizing Girl Scouts of all people?”

Here is where the half-truth headline would have been better clarified with, say:
Bishops Scrutinize Girl Scout Leadership
ties to Abortion Clinics, Radical Groups – closer to the truth yet but an aspect of the story.
Leadership would be grown ups. Dubious ties (that contradict church teaching) is what is really being scrutinized.
Or is that “too far the other way”? In that the scrutiny is not a conclusion yet … and a headline making such possible links public works to the end that some will pull their
kids out of the group while the issue is in doubt.
Bishops To Meet With Girl Scout Leaders,
Discuss Sex Ed. materals on Parish Grounds
This one would be
so neutral as to play it as not a controversy, but a common plan!
Writing headlines is not easy. It is important. It can be misleading. Deliberately so or accidentally. And it’s something that, as a journalist, I notice and want to call people’s attention to.
As this threads’ headline lent itself perfectly to a radical recasting of the whole event with just a little change … I didn’t think pondering the headline was off-topic, but very germane.
Meanwhile, like Toward Truth here, I’ll be on the lookout for what has been done on this since June.
This isn’t “new” technically but was “new” to me and on topic (from the National Catholic Register) – with a “neutral” … because it’s a question … yet direction-giving headline (because of what the “question” asks). In the SUBHEADLINE … boys as girls?!

ncregister.com/daily-news/is-the-girl-scouts-safe-for-catholic-girls-part-2
Some complaints about the Girl Scouts from ex-member girl and her mom on YouTube
that speak to why the “scrutiny” might be happening per the Church and its affiliation with the group.
youtube.com/watch?v=qqxLIcmmTZQ&feature=player_embedded#t=510s (there are three parts, this is part 1)
And a news story on that series (for background).
theblaze.com/stories/2012/07/13/shocking-anti-girl-scouts-video-series-exposes-alleged-ties-to-leftist-groups/