Give Father Jenkins an ultimatum!

  • Thread starter Thread starter toughcritic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

toughcritic

Guest
I keep reading about the thousands around the country and around the world protesting Father Jenkins and the Notre Dame faculty honoring Obama. I read in THE WANDERER that more and more bishops are joining the protest against Obama’s presence at Notre Dame. Is not Father Jenkins subject to the authority of his dicocesan archbishop? Did he not take a vow of obedience? It seems the pressure should be put on the archbishop of South Bend to put it straight to Jenkins: RESCIND THE INVITATION TO OBAMA OR LOSE YOUR JOB AND THE CATHOLIC DESIGNATION OF YOUR UNIVERSITY WITH ALL THAT IMPLYS! What is the problem? The bulk of Catholics and the alumni already feel that way. Surely this is not the insurmountable problem that it appears to be. THE ARCHBISHOP SHOULD EITHER USE HIS RIGHTFUL AUTHORITY OR LOSE IT!
 
I keep reading about the thousands around the country and around the world protesting Father Jenkins and the Notre Dame faculty honoring Obama. I read in THE WANDERER that more and more bishops are joining the protest against Obama’s presence at Notre Dame. Is not Father Jenkins subject to the authority of his dicocesan archbishop? Did he not take a vow of obedience? It seems the pressure should be put on the archbishop of South Bend to put it straight to Jenkins: RESCIND THE INVITATION TO OBAMA OR LOSE YOUR JOB AND THE CATHOLIC DESIGNATION OF YOUR UNIVERSITY WITH ALL THAT IMPLYS! What is the problem? The bulk of Catholics and the alumni already feel that way. Surely this is not the insurmountable problem that it appears to be. THE ARCHBISHOP SHOULD EITHER USE HIS RIGHTFUL AUTHORITY OR LOSE IT!
Several clarifications:
  1. Bishops have no authority over religious. Religious make a vow of obedience to their founder, their superior and their confreres, not to the bishop.
  2. Bishops have no authority over institutions run by the laity or by religious orders. These institutions are chartered by the universal Church’s Congregation for Education and by the State.
  3. The president of a university is employed by the Board of Trustees, not by the bishop. The religious community has a contract with the Board. In this case, the Congregation of the Holy Cross has a contract with the Board of Trustees to allow Fr. Jenkins to serve as the president of the university. The Congregation can get sued if they remove Fr. Jenkins and they will lose the case in court, because the reasons for the suit are not supported by state or federal law.
  4. Currently, Notre Dame is run by a lay group of trustees, not by the Holy Cross Brothers. They call the shots at the university.
  5. The Conference of Bishops can ask the Church to rescind the university’s Catholic status, but that has to go through an ecclesial tribunal. It is easier said than done.
Hope this helps.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
Several clarifications:
  1. Bishops have no authority over religious. Religious make a vow of obedience to their founder, their superior and their confreres, not to the bishop.
Is Fr Jenkins a priest or a religious? Don’t priests take vows of obedience to the Bishop?
 
Is Fr Jenkins a priest or a religious? Don’t priests take vows of obedience to the Bishop?
Fr. Jenkins is an ordained religious Brother of the Holy Cross. Only secular priests make a PROMISE of obedience to the bishop of the diocese. Religious do not.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
  1. The president of a university is employed by the Board of Trustees, not by the bishop. The religious community has a contract with the Board. In this case, the Congregation of the Holy Cross has a contract with the Board of Trustees to allow Fr. Jenkins to serve as the president of the university. The Congregation can get sued if they remove Fr. Jenkins and they will lose the case in court, because the reasons for the suit are not supported by state or federal law.
Emphasis mine.

I have NEVER heard of this before and wonder how can the Board of Trustees meddle in the internal affairs of the Congregation.
 
I would like to address this from a previous responder

“The president of a university is employed by the Board of Trustees, not by the bishop. The religious community has a contract with the Board. In this case, the Congregation of the Holy Cross has a contract with the Board of Trustees to allow Fr. Jenkins to serve as the president of the university.”

It is my understanding that the Board of trustees is made up of 50% Congregation of the Holy Cross Fathers and % 50 secular/laity/whomever. Why don’t the Congregation of the Holy Cross Fathers on the Board do something?

May God bless you
 
Notre Dame is also home to such famous dissidents as Fr. Richard McBrien, so-called ‘Professor of Theology’ who is under the bishop.

… Nothing happened to 'm yet.
 
This is a test for the Holy Cross Brothers!

**It looks like they flunked out of the University of Jesus Christ!!!
**
i don’t want that FFFFFFFFFFF on my transcript!!!

Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, Ora Pro Nobis Peccatoribus!

mark
 
Emphasis mine.

I have NEVER heard of this before and wonder how can the Board of Trustees meddle in the internal affairs of the Congregation.
The Board cannot meddle in the internal affairs of the congregation. However, there is a legal contract between the Board and the congregation.

The Holy Cross Brothers make up half of the Board of Trustees, but there are no Holy Cross Brothers ont the Board of Directors. This is the group that works directly with the president of the university.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
I would like to address this from a previous responder

“The president of a university is employed by the Board of Trustees, not by the bishop. The religious community has a contract with the Board. In this case, the Congregation of the Holy Cross has a contract with the Board of Trustees to allow Fr. Jenkins to serve as the president of the university.”

It is my understanding that the Board of trustees is made up of 50% Congregation of the Holy Cross Fathers and % 50 secular/laity/whomever. Why don’t the Congregation of the Holy Cross Fathers on the Board do something?

May God bless you
They don’t have total control. They don’t have enough votes on the Board of Trustees. Even if they did, the Board of Directors runs the day to day operations of the university, not the Trustees. The Trustees would have to go over the heads of the Directors. That creates an internal mess. Presently, no Holy Cross Brothers were elected to the Board of Directors of ND. Everyone on that board is lay.

It often happens that when you have lay boards such as these, they start off well, but as they grow in power, they begin to exert it over the religious and there is not much that the religious can do.

Unfortunately, the reason why so many religious have had to surrender control of their colleges and universities to lay Boards and non-profits is because the Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Department of Education could not give tax money to religioius institutions unless they rendered a service to the state. In other words, unless they were subcontractors for the state.

Many students depend on federal money to attend college. They get federal grants to pay tuition and the schools also get federal grants to make up the operating budget. Should the schools lose those grants, they would have to pass the cost on to the students.

The federal loans and grants that the students get is not enough to pay for oeprating larger universities. The Catholic community is stuck. We surrender control of our colleges and universities to non-profits and lay boards or we reduce our colleges and universities to teach only those who can pay $200,000.00 for a four year degree. Even with federal aid to students and schools, the average tuition for a private university in the USA is average at $80K. That does not include housing and meals.

My son lives at home and attends a private secular unviersity. His four-year degree will cost $110,000.00. Most os us cannot afford that. We count on federal aid to the kids and the schools.

This whole thing had to be though out better by the university’s administration. That’s the problem. Fr. Jenkins is not the only guilty one here. He has become the whipping boy and so has his congregation. In the meantime, the other administrators and trustees are living in anonymity, while there is a problem that they helped to create. But their argument is going to be that the president of the university gets paid to deal with the public and the Church. The truth is that what they pay the congregation for his services is only half of what they would pay a lay president.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
If Notre Dame is to call itself Catholic, should it not be abiding by Ex Corde Ecclesiae?
 
Several clarifications:
  1. Bishops have no authority over religious. Religious make a vow of obedience to their founder, their superior and their confreres, not to the bishop.
  2. Bishops have no authority over institutions run by the laity or by religious orders. These institutions are chartered by the universal Church’s Congregation for Education and by the State.
  3. The president of a university is employed by the Board of Trustees, not by the bishop. The religious community has a contract with the Board. In this case, the Congregation of the Holy Cross has a contract with the Board of Trustees to allow Fr. Jenkins to serve as the president of the university. The Congregation can get sued if they remove Fr. Jenkins and they will lose the case in court, because the reasons for the suit are not supported by state or federal law.
  4. Currently, Notre Dame is run by a lay group of trustees, not by the Holy Cross Brothers. They call the shots at the university.
  5. The Conference of Bishops can ask the Church to rescind the university’s Catholic status, but that has to go through an ecclesial tribunal. It is easier said than done.
Hope this helps.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
The Pope can laicized him and give a warning to Holy Cross. The Pope is the head of the Catholic Church. This will give a final warning to those who do not uphold Catholic teachings. The board and trustees may hold power over the school. But, they do not hold power over a Priest and his functions as a Priest. Hear Confessions, say Mass, Confirm, etc…
 
The Pope can laicized him and give a warning to Holy Cross. The Pope is the head of the Catholic Church. This will give a final warning to those who do not uphold Catholic teachings. The board and trustees may hold power over the school. But, they do not hold power over a Priest and his functions as a Priest. Hear Confessions, say Mass, Confirm, etc…
Popes do not get involved with individual religious. They abide by the principal of subsidiarity. They allow the superiors general to take care of their own. But superiors general cannot dispense anyone. The only way that the Church will strip a priest of his clerical state is in cases of heresy or schism. In the case of a religious the superior general must present the case before the Sacred Congregation for the Clergy. They have to justify it. It is not an easy thing to do.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top