E
EasterJoy
Guest
You are mistaken that the Church does not allow separation with the bond remaining or that civil divorce cannot be tolerated when justice requires it–such as when it is the only way to protect one spouse from the irresponsibility of the other.How can you say I am not aware of how damaging alcohol can be? What I was saying was if someone else chooses to damage themselves with alcohol their is not a lot I can do about it. It only becomes an issue is their alcohol abuse affects my well being or my children’s well being. If it does not affect that, what more am I supposed to do if someone who is an adult and well aware of how what they are doing affects them still chooses to do it? Being spouse does not mean being a keeper.
That said, I would like to retract what I said. I have been fooled, duped and l now think posters were right. I should divorce. I should end it forever and no going back. It’s over. I cannot leave the family home, but I don’t have to be married in it and let’s face it. What is the difference? Why can a couple not be divorced and live under the same roof for practical reasons? That is what my lawyer advised. It is possible to separate and live under the same roof and the reasons for doing so are practical and legal. Yes, I could move to another home but the only the frame changes not the picture. My husband would still have rights to see the children, I would be chasing him for maintenance, he could still make my life and the kids lives a misery, and he would get the family home while I paid extortionate rent earning half what he does.
All things considered, it is best to divorce yet live under the same roof. I have given up on a relationship. It is not going to happen and the Church does not allow it. So why not live in the same house yet be divorced? If I lived somewhere else my husband could still make my life a misery, and as he would have access to the kids he could still hurt them. I have moved out of our bedroom tonight and I will not be returning. The marriage is over but we must live in the same house. I will never know love, but perhaps the price of being loved is too high a price to pay.
…
*Can. 1151 Spouses have the duty and right to preserve conjugal living unless a legitimate cause excuses them.
Can. 1153 §1. If either of the spouses causes grave mental or physical danger to the other spouse or to the offspring or otherwise renders common life too difficult, that spouse gives the other a legitimate cause for leaving, either by decree of the local ordinary or even on his or her own authority if there is danger in delay.*
**Catechecism of the Catholic Church:*****2383 **The separation of spouses while maintaining the marriage bond can be legitimate in certain cases provided for by canon law.(Cf. CIC, cann. 1151-1155)
If civil divorce remains the only possible way of ensuring certain legal rights, the care of the children, or the protection of inheritance, it can be tolerated and does not constitute a moral offense*
It is vastly unlikely, almost to the point if impossibility, that you and your children are not harmed (and most probably profoundly harmed) by staying under the same roof with a regular alcohol abuser for a long period of time. A child is harmed by being around an adult, especially a parent, who is unreliable, unpredictable, and self-absorbed. That is what we are when we are drunk. We can’t help it. As you know too well, poor thing, that intoxicant-fueled unreliability, unpredictability, and self-absorption doesn’t do anything good for spouses who were promised the goods of marriage and who have done their best to provide that for their un-reciprocating husbands and wives, either.
Your children can also be harmed by your failure to remove them from a situation that is damaging to them. If your husband is acting in ways that are harmful to them, you have a duty to get them into a living situation without him, if that is a realistic possibility. Yes: What you failed to do to protect them can harm them, too.
All this is something that is discerned on a case-by-case basis, however. We can tell you that it is very likely that you will be doing the right thing by getting yourself and your children out of a home shared with an alcoholic who will not accept the harm done by his drinking nor take any steps to stop it. The research says that serious harm is typically suffered throughout adulthood by children who grow up with an alcoholic in their home. You were right in the first place, however, by saying that people on the outside do not have the information, authority, or right to make this judgment for someone else. Sometimes families stay together in these situations, and it turns out to have been the right thing. It does happen. It is unfortunate, but the burden of deciding what to do falls on the sober parent, the one who does not have the enslavement of alcohol preventing her from doing what has to be done.
God be with you. I do not envy your position. It is not fair, it is not easy, and it is not what you deserve after having been faithful to your marriage. I hope you will be able to find a St. Veronica and a Simon of Cyrene to help you through this.
By the way, I know of a book by a woman who was both alcoholic herself and a co-dependent for someone else who abused alcohol. I found it has a lot of good advice for anyone needing guidance on how to draw boundaries and communicate in healthy ways, whether or not addiction is involved. It is called, “Co-Dependent No More,” by Melody Beattie. I think she has a new edition out, too. I’d encourage you to read it; I think it might help you. She is a big believe in Alcoholics Anonymous and Al-Anon, but it has other helpful concepts in it, too.