Global Climate Change and our Catholic Response

  • Thread starter Thread starter 4elise
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
4

4elise

Guest
Rather than provide a link - this is the content of the PDF from the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops web site titled:** Global Climate Change and our Catholic Response ** - in additional posts I will list additional content - without links - to information that I have found on this site and the site of the Catholic Coalition on Climate Changesites.

I believe as Catholics we are called to care deeply about this issue and do what we can to make lasting changes for the good.

**What is the Issue? **
Climate change is at the center of the environmental challenges facing our nation and the world. Some of the impacts of climate change include increased temperatures, rising sea levels, and changes in rainfall that contribute to more frequent and severe floods and droughts. People living in poverty—both at home and abroad—contribute least to climate change but they are likely to suffer its worst consequences with
few resources to adapt and respond. The effects of climate change—increasingly limited access to water, reduced crop yields, more widespread disease, increased frequency and intensity of natural disasters, and conflict over declining resources—are making the lives of the world’s poorest people even more precarious.

**Why Should People of Faith Care? **
The Catholic Church brings a distinct perspective to the debate about climate change
by lifting up the moral dimensions of this issue and the needs of the most vulnerable among us. As Catholics our faith calls us to care for all of God’s creation, especially the ‘least of these’ (Mt 25:40). Of particular concern to the Church is how climate change and the response to it will affect poor and vulnerable people here at home and around the world.

In 2001, the United States bishops adopted a statement on climate change, Global Climate Change: A Plea for Dialogue, Prudence and the Common Good, and declared that, “At its core, global climate change is not about economic theory or political platforms, nor about partisan advantage or interest group pressures. It is about the future of God’s creation and the one human family. It is about protecting both the ‘human environment’ and the natural environment.”

Protecting God’s Creation and “the least of these” requires urgent, wise and bold action.
Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI have continually emphasized the moral dimensions of climate change and our responsibility to care for creation. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), through its Environmental Justice Program, has been inviting and assisting Catholics to take this challenge to heart. The EJP program was Global Climate Change and our Catholic Response created in 1993 to motivate Catholics to a deeper reverence and respect for God’s creation, and to
encourage Catholics to address environmental problems, particularly as they affect poor and vulnerable people.

Through its international humanitarian relief and development programs, Catholic Relief Services (CRS) is helping to strengthen the ability of the most vulnerable communities in the developing world to respond to and prepare for the effects of climate change. CRS provides education and training to poor communities that reduce their vulnerability to climate impacts, such as floods, droughts and storms.

The Catholic Coalition on Climate Change (CCCC), a partnership of national Catholic organizations formed in 2006 that includes the USCCB and CRS, encourages a more thoughtful dialogue about ways the Catholic community can respond to climate change. CCCC invites Catholics to participate in a new initiative offering a distinctively Catholic perspective on global climate change. This initiative offers Catholics the opportunity to stand with people living in poverty, in our nation and around the world, who
are facing the worst impacts of climate change.

What Response is Needed?
A central moral measure of our response to climate change is how it touches poor and vulnerable people. Poor people cannot bear an undue burden of the global adjustments needed to address climate change.

As the U.S. Congress considers climate legislation, Catholics Confront Global Poverty invites Catholics to advocate for policies that reduce the impact of climate change on people living in poverty. Well-designed climate change policies can help both reduce the severity of climate change and protect the most vulnerable by:

• Creating new and necessary resources to assist poor and adversely affected communities in adapting to and easing the effects of global climate change in the U.S. and in the most vulnerable developing countries;
• Ensuring that the most useful technology is promptly made available to people in
the most vulnerable developing countries to help them adapt to the effects of climate change (adaptation) and reduce their own greenhouse gas emissions
(mitigation); and
• Promoting the participation of local communities in programs for adapting to climate
change and easing its effects.

**How Does Climate Change Affect Real People? **

Teshome, a farmer in Bedossa Betella, Ethiopia, grows carrots to support his family. Drought, one effect of climate change, has affected Teshome’s family and countless others.

One of the effects of global climate change affecting many countries has been severe
weather, including both flooding and drought. In Ethiopia, the past several decades have seen repeated droughts, which have often led to famine due to farmers’ inability to grow food during droughts. In some parts of Ethiopia, CRS has been able to help small farmers such as Teshome Bekele, pictured above, adapt to the effects of climate change. CRS’s project helps farmers diversify their incomes, introducing fruit, vegetables, spices and fodder to add to the crops they have grown for decades. With drought becoming more frequent due to climate change, CRS hopes that growing a variety of crops less dependent on water will allow the farmers to continue to support themselves and their families.

But in most other parts of the country and world, farmers haven’t been so lucky. Experts agree that poor people are likely to be the worst hit by the impacts of climate change.
The United Nations reports that by 2020, 75 million to 250 million people in Africa will be exposed to increased water stress due to climate change.

United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
3211 4th St., NE, Washington, DC 20017

Catholic Relief Services
228 W. Lexington St., Baltimore, MD 21201
 
Im a degreed meteorologist and I can tell you there is no global warming and even if there is . It is not man made and mankind can’t do a thing about it. It’s just a scam to make the USA a 3rd world socialist nation and nothing more.
 
From Letter from National Conferences of Catholic Bishops
to the Leaders of the G8 Nations / June 17, 2008


Once again the agenda of your Summit includes global climate change, an issue of particular concern to people of faith based on our commitment to protect God’s creation. As Catholic bishops, we have a special concern for the impact of climate change on the poor. The poor, who have contributed least to the human activities that aggravate global climate change, are likely to experience a disproportionate share of its harmful effects, including potential conflicts, escalating energy costs, and health problems. This is true in our own countries as well as in Africa and elsewhere in the developing world. The costs of initiatives to prevent and adapt to the harmful consequences of climate change should be borne more by richer persons and nations who have benefited most from the emissions that have fueled development and should not unduly burden the poor. Specific mechanisms should be created to help poor persons and nations adapt to the effects of global climate change and adopt appropriate technologies that will enhance their development in ways that do not contribute to global climate change.

The G8 Summit will explore many issues of critical importance to human life and dignity. We pray that your meeting will be blessed by a spirit of collaboration that enables you to advance the global common good by taking concrete measures to reduce poverty and address climate change.

Sincerely yours,

Most Rev. Vernon James Weisgerber
Archbishop of Winnipeg
President, Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops

His Eminence André Vingt-Trois
Archbishop of Paris
President of the Bishops’ Conference of France (Conférence des évêques de France)

Most Rev. Robert Zollitsch
Archbishop of Freiburg
President of the German Bishops’ Conference (Deutsche Bischofskonferenz)

His Eminence Angelo Cardinal Bagnasco
Archbishop of Genoa
President, Bishops’ Conference of Italy

Most Rev. Peter Takeo Okada
Archbishop of Tÿkyÿ
President, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Japan

Most Rev. Joseph Werth
Bishop of the Diocese of the Transfiguration of the Lord in Novosibirsk
President, Conference of Catholic Bishops of the Russian Federation

His Eminence Keith Patrick Cardinal O’Brien
Archbishop of Edinburgh and St Andrews
President, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Scotland

His Eminence Cormac Cardinal Murphy-O’Connor
Archbishop of Westminster
President, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales

His Eminence Francis Cardinal George
Archbishop of Chicago
President, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

Our Catholic Bishops called the leaders of the world to reflect on this - we too must consider how our actions may contribute - what can we do as individuals?
 
Church Teaching Resources from: The Catholic Coalition on Climate Change which is a partnership of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the National Religious Partnership for the Environment

Catholic teaching on climate change embraces the principles of prudence, poverty and the common good. These three principles form the foundation of our work.

1. Prudence

“Prudence is intelligence applied to our actions … a thoughtful, deliberate, and reasoned basis for taking or avoiding action to achieve a moral good.” —U.S. Bishops

The Coalition accepts overwhelming scientific consensus about climate change. There is nearly unanimous agreement that human actions are creating a warming planet. As stewards of all creation, we must identify wise, careful actions that will reverse this climate change and avoid its potentially dangerous impact on all life—especially human life.

State and local Catholic leaders can play a central role in bringing together scientists, theologians, business and labor leaders, government officials, human service providers and other stakeholders to shape a wise and careful approach consistent with our principles. With such leadership, the Catholic community will answer God’s call to be faithful stewards.

2. Poverty

“… any successful strategy must also reflect the genuine participation and concerns of those most affected and least able to bear the burdens … [this] is a moral and political necessity …” —U.S. Bishops

Natural disasters take the greatest toll on poor people. Inadequate transportation, lack of insurance, poor housing and little if any cash reserves put them on the edge of the precipice. To survive severe storms, prolonged droughts, extended heat waves and other climate-related events, these vulnerable sisters and brothers must receive assistance—both public and private.

The Coalition seeks to find constructive ways to approach climate change from the bottom up. We strive to bring the voice of the poor to the public debate about climate change and ensure that resources are available to the most vulnerable.

3. The Common Good

“Responses to global climate change should reflect our interdependence and common responsibility for the future of our planet. Individual nations must measure their own self-interest against the greater common good and contribute equitably to global solutions.” —U.S. Bishops

Climate change provides an opportunity to act with courage and creativity as individuals, as people of faith, as a nation. As a wealthy nation and as the top contributor to greenhouse gases, we in the United States must help to shape responses that serve not only our own interests but those the of the entire human family. The Coalition assists the Catholic community in linking personal stewardship and care for creation with our moral responsibilities to practice solidarity.
 
Church Teaching Resources from: The Catholic Coalition on Climate Change which is a partnership of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the National Religious Partnership for the Environment

Vatican Messages

Holy Father’s Easter Message Highlights Climate Change. Our beloved Pope links the threat of climate change with so many other threats to life and dignity in his annual Easter message:

At a time of world food shortage, of financial turmoil, of old and new forms of poverty, of disturbing climate change, of violence and deprivation which force many to leave their homelands in search of a less precarious form of existence, of the ever-present threat of terrorism, of growing fears over the future, it is urgent to rediscover grounds for hope. Let no one draw back from this peaceful battle that has been launched by Christ’s Resurrection. For as I said earlier, Christ is looking for men and women who will help him to affirm his victory using his own weapons: the weapons of justice and truth, mercy, forgiveness and love.
—Pope Benedict XVI, Urbi et Orbi, Easter 2009

“The brutal consumption of creation begins where God is not, where matter is henceforth only material for us, where we ourselves are the ultimate demand, where the whole is merely our property and we consume it for ourselves alone … I think, therefore, that true and effective initiatives to prevent the waste and destruction of creation can be implemented and developed, understood and lived, only where creation is considered as beginning with God.”
—Pope Benedict XVI, August 2008

“… make the responsibilities visible so that we may respond to this great challenge: to rediscover the Face of the Creatora in Creation, to rediscover in the Creator’s presence our responsibilities for his Creation, which he has entrusted to us, to form the ethical capacity for a lifestyle that we must adopt if we wish to tackle the problems of this situation [of climate change] and if we really want to reach positive solutions.

“Do not be fooled by those who see you as just another consumer in a market of undifferentiated possibilities, where choice itself becomes the good, novelty usurps beauty, and subjective experience displaces truth…

“My dear friends, God’s creation is one and it is good. The concerns for non-violence, sustainable development, justice and peace, and care for our environment are of vital importance for humanity.”
—Pope Benedict XVI at World Youth Day, June 2008

“Prudence does not mean failing to accept responsibilities and postponing decisions; it means being committed to making joint decisions after pondering responsibly the road to be taken, decisions aimed at strengthening that covenant between human beings and the environment, which should mirror the creative love of God, from whom we come and towards whom we are journeying.

"If the protection of the environment involves costs, they should be justly distributed, taking due account of the different levels of development of various countries and the need for solidarity with future generations.”
—Pope Benedict XVI, World Day of Peace Message, December 2007
 
From the Catholic Coalition on Climate Change which is a partnership of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the National Religious Partnership for the Environment

“It is our corporate misfortune to be sharing a dying world while holding the cure in our hands.” - Brian McCaffery, Deacon and Biologist

From a Deacon and Biologist Brian McCaffery of the Diocese of Fairbanks offers a profound reflection on faith and climate change in his high school alumni magazine. Read the article - I would invite anyone interested in this topic to Google this article - very moving.
 
From: The Catholic Coalition on Climate Change which is a partnership of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the National Religious Partnership for the Environment

From a Diocesan Social Ministry Leader Norbertine Brother, Steve Herro of the Diocese of Green Bay writes about climate change, public policy and our obligation to the poor for the diocesan newspaper The Compass - Official Newspaper of the Catholic Diocese of Green Bay, Wisconsin -July 4, 2008 Issue - you can ‘Google’ the article: The battle for climate change control continues
 
This Catholic believes that ‘climate change’ is junk science, designed to spread hysteria and socialist power plays.

Watch the climate-worshipers justify abortion for a ‘dying’ world. There is nothing Catholic in that.
 
Im a degreed meteorologist and I can tell you there is no global warming and even if there is . It is not man made and mankind can’t do a thing about it. It’s just a scam to make the USA a 3rd world socialist nation and nothing more.
Aren’t there other “degreed” meteorologists who disagree with you opinion that there is no global warming? Aren’t there other “degreed” meteorologists who disagree with your opinion that global warming is not man made? If there is a moral componant to the question of global warming and how it affects the most vulnerable among us (the poor, those who live on islands or near coastlines that may be swamped by the sea, those who make their living from the sea and whose livelihood may be threatened), it seems to me there is something we can do about it, even if it is only to reflect on how our own lifestyle may cause or alleviate such suffering. Also, I am very interested in your documentation concerning your belief that the subject of global warming is merely “a scam designed to make the U.S.A. a 3rd world socialist nation and nothing more.” Your opinion, without documentation of course, sounds like blind paranoia to me.
 
One Scientist listed on the Catholic Coalition on Climate Change is Dr. Glenn Juday, Professor of Forest Ecology and Director of the Tree-Ring Laboratory in the School of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, presented the science of climate change to Alaska’s four Catholic bishops and other leaders at a hearing in Anchorage on June 2, 2007.

I Googled his name and found a great PowerPoint -
 
Aren’t there other “degreed” meteorologists who disagree with you opinion that there is no global warming? Aren’t there other “degreed” meteorologists who disagree with your opinion that global warming is not man made? If there is a moral componant to the question of global warming and how it affects the most vulnerable among us (the poor, those who live on islands or near coastlines that may be swamped by the sea, those who make their living from the sea and whose livelihood may be threatened), it seems to me there is something we can do about it, even if it is only to reflect on how our own lifestyle may cause or alleviate such suffering. Also, I am very interested in your documentation concerning your belief that the subject of global warming is merely “a scam designed to make the U.S.A. a 3rd world socialist nation and nothing more.” Your opinion, without documentation of course, sounds like blind paranoia to me.
Yes there are those who disagree, but believe it or not they are in the minority. I’d have to dig up documentation that predates the internet. As far as 3rd world socialist nation. Lets look at what would be done to stop this socalled global warming. More regulation on automobiles and businesses. Which will price the oporation of an automobile out of most people thus another freedom gone.Going to work is one thing, but my spouse has doctors who are very neccesary specialists for her many disabilities and ailments far from our home and not on a public transportation route. Her health is tons more important to me than anything having to do with our climate quite frankly. If you want some documentation read Trashing the Planet, by Dixie Lee Ray. And don’t waste your time with reading anything by Al Gore.🤷
 
This Catholic believes that ‘climate change’ is junk science, designed to spread hysteria and socialist power plays.

Watch the climate-worshipers justify abortion for a ‘dying’ world. There is nothing Catholic in that.
You’re certainly entitled to your opinion, but I’m interested in knowing why you think climate change is “junk science.” As for thinking that the notion of climate change is “designed to spread hysteria and socialist power plays,” well, as I mentioned in an earlier post, without proper documentation it just sounds like paranoia. I’m more interested in informed opinion.
 
Yes there are those who disagree, but believe it or not they are in the minority. I’d have to dig up documentation that predates the internet. As far as 3rd world socialist nation. Lets look at what would be done to stop this socalled global warming. More regulation on automobiles and businesses. Which will price the oporation of an automobile out of most people thus another freedom gone.Going to work is one thing, but my spouse has doctors who are very neccesary specialists for her many disabilities and ailments far from our home and not on a public transportation route. Her health is tons more important to me than anything having to do with our climate quite frankly. If you want some documentation read Trashing the Planet, by Dixie Lee Ray. And don’t waste your time with reading anything by Al Gore.🤷
Yes, I believe I have read that the number of scientists who believe global warming is a growing danger is less than the number of those who think otherwise. Of course, that doesn’t mean that minority of scientists is wrong. It could mean they are ahead of the curve. Secondly, I would think (though I don’t know for sure) that documentation on global warming that predates the internet is already outdated and would not really be useful in understanding whether global warming is a fact or a myth. Have you read anything on the subject more recent? Your idea that regulations on automobiles and businesses, that the danger of global warming may require, are a harbinger of socialist government and the loss of freedom is somewhat exagerrated, I think. After all, automobiles and businesses are regulated to some extent now and I don’t see a significant loss of freedom in society. Indeed, I would think that some of those regulations allow greater freedom for all businesses, especially small businesses, to operate in society and certain regulations regarding automobiles make them safer and easier for all to use. Is it a socialist notion to require seatbelts? I don’t think so. In addition, if global warming was recognized as a danger in need of attention, I think there would be various ideas put forward that would not necessarily demand regulations at all. Naturally, debate would be necessary, but I think you are jumping the gun when you forsee a vast new set of laws forbidding citizens from enjoying their rights as granted in the Constitution. I feel for you and your wife and agree that your wife’s health should be of primary importance to you. I’m not sure caring about global warming somehow detracts from the care you should show for your wife. I do thank you for the reading recommendation you offered. I will try to read Ms. Ray’s book, but I think I’ll also read whatever Mr. Gore has written. It’s not really a waste of time to read both sides of an argument, especially one that has so much potential for planetary disaster if ignored.
 
Yes, I believe I have read that the number of scientists who believe global warming is a growing danger is less than the number of those who think otherwise. Of course, that doesn’t mean that minority of scientists is wrong. It could mean they are ahead of the curve. Secondly, I would think (though I don’t know for sure) that documentation on global warming that predates the internet is already outdated and would not really be useful in understanding whether global warming is a fact or a myth. Have you read anything on the subject more recent? Your idea that regulations on automobiles and businesses, that the danger of global warming may require, are a harbinger of socialist government and the loss of freedom is somewhat exagerrated, I think. After all, automobiles and businesses are regulated to some extent now and I don’t see a significant loss of freedom in society. Indeed, I would think that some of those regulations allow greater freedom for all businesses, especially small businesses, to operate in society and certain regulations regarding automobiles make them safer and easier for all to use. Is it a socialist notion to require seatbelts? I don’t think so. In addition, if global warming was recognized as a danger in need of attention, I think there would be various ideas put forward that would not necessarily demand regulations at all. Naturally, debate would be necessary, but I think you are jumping the gun when you forsee a vast new set of laws forbidding citizens from enjoying their rights as granted in the Constitution. I feel for you and your wife and agree that your wife’s health should be of primary importance to you. I’m not sure caring about global warming somehow detracts from the care you should show for your wife. I do thank you for the reading recommendation you offered. I will try to read Ms. Ray’s book, but I think I’ll also read whatever Mr. Gore has written. It’s not really a waste of time to read both sides of an argument, especially one that has so much potential for planetary disaster if ignored.
Yep and you know I would like to see this evidence that the it;s the minority of scientists that believe global warming is a growing problem. Cause from what I have read the majority believe it’;s something we need to do something about. And that those who think it;s either not happening or isn;t a problem are the ones actually in the minority. But yeah more recent info is probably best. Heck while far from useless…even the IPCC report of 2007 is a little out of date even now!

To be honest though I donlt read anything Gore has to say purposely for the most part and I haven;t seen his video. Personally I kinda wish he had never gotten involved in the debate because I think he is a big part of why people are so suspicious and unwilling to listen to what the scientists have to say. Personally I think the best thing to do is read what the actual scientists have to say.

And yeah the idea that all our freedoms will be taken away and we will become a socialist nation seems rather silly to me too. And you know it;s claims like that and ones like it;s all a scam or the scientists are all in it for money that for me personally make it very hard to take the other side seriously. Especially since 99% of these claims are backed by little to no evidence.
 
Global-mean monthly, annual and seasonal land-ocean temperature index, 1880-present, updated through most recent month:
data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt
GISS Surface temperature analysis:
data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/

According to the data given, there appears to be a trend in the global mean temperature which is indicated to have risen since 1880. I suggest the possibility that we assume, as far fetched as it is, that perhaps we can give consideration to the accuracy of global temperature measurement from 1880 through 1950 as compared against 1951 through 2008 data. For the sake of argument lets assume it is accurate.
The data linked above from GISS could be looked at in various ways. Since they use a base period from 1951 to 1980 to derive their mean, one could expect the population of above and below variations of the mean line to be roughly equal. Since their trend line shows an increasing temperature up to the mean from 1880 through 1950, that (as silly as it is to make a black/white comparison using pre 50’s data against post 50’s data) would indicate a rise from the lower limit of the population. From 1980 through present would indicate a rise from the mean toward the higher limit in the cycle after which point the high limit is reach, there should be a downward trend observed. Of course we couldn’t know with such a short time frame what that high limit is.
Further the base period would appear to have been arbitrarily set and credence given to this base period being called ‘normal’ should be done with caution. Since we can already observe a marked downward trend in the yearly mean, it would possibly make more sense if the base period was moved to an earlier period in the historical data, since the current base may be well offset from the mean midpoint of the climate cycle.
It would therefore be premature to hypothesize that the temperature will continue to rise throughout the next 130 years?
What else that is missing is the study indicating that this warming trend is man’s doing, not an effect of natural cause.
 
And yeah the idea that all our freedoms will be taken away and we will become a socialist nation seems rather silly to me too. And you know it;s claims like that and ones like it;s all a scam or the scientists are all in it for money that for me personally make it very hard to take the other side seriously.
Actually global warming is driven more by the agenda for population control.
 
I wonder if anyone is interested in discussing the original post from the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops?
 
You’re certainly entitled to your opinion, but I’m interested in knowing why you think climate change is “junk science.” As for thinking that the notion of climate change is “designed to spread hysteria and socialist power plays,” well, as I mentioned in an earlier post, without proper documentation it just sounds like paranoia. I’m more interested in informed opinion.
I think your side of the issue is the one that needs propper documentation.
 
I think we as Catholics can respond to any and all human need regardless of whether or not it’s caused by “Global warming” and regardless of the cause of such “Global warming”.

Whether or not one buys into the man-made aspect of increasing global climate temperature is irrelevant to how we can help our fellow man…except if one then buys the arguments about how we can and should change our lifestyle to decrease carbon emissions, use only a single square of toilet paper,etc. etc.
 
I think we as Catholics can respond to any and all human need regardless of whether or not it’s caused by “Global warming” and regardless of the cause of such “Global warming”.

Whether or not one buys into the man-made aspect of increasing global climate temperature is irrelevant to how we can help our fellow man…except if one then buys the arguments about how we can and should change our lifestyle to decrease carbon emissions, use only a single square of toilet paper,etc. etc.
Help my fellow human, definitely yes! Change my lifestyle , I’d rather die.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top