Global Warming: Speech by Al Gore filled with vulgarity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monte_RCMS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
That’s what I think all this climate change and global warming talk is about. It’s all just paranoia. People are freaking out, and they really don’t know what they are talking about. The sky is not falling this time buddies. Just relax. Move on with your lives. Stop buying organic shortbread to save the whales.
 
kimmielittle said:
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: Attack my science…

Once again you are proving personal attacks are your favorite modus operandi - Somehow.that just doesn’t fit with an agnostic / scientific type logic . to me.

BUT have a go…it doesn’t diminish the facts.

YOU diminish you IMO 😃
Click to expand...
As far I as know, kimmielitte’s science is not published. I have not seen any science here to attack.
 
joshrp said:
That’s what I think all this climate change and global warming talk is about. It’s all just paranoia. People are freaking out, and they really don’t know what they are talking about. The sky is not falling this time buddies. Just relax. Move on with your lives. Stop buying organic shortbread to save the whales.
Click to expand...
Why can’t you with your college education answer a simple science question?

What is the distinction between global warming and climate change?

Or, is a question like that a thing that begs the question?
 
StrawberryJam said:
Why can’t you with your college education answer a simple science question?

What is the distinction between global warming and climate change?

Or, is a question like that a thing that begs the question?
Click to expand...
Why can’t you tell me the distinction between global warming and climate change? Are you asking me because you don’t know or because you want to test me?
 
joshrp said:
Why can’t you tell me the distinction between global warming and climate change? Are you asking me because you don’t know or because you want to test me?
Click to expand...
When you made the postive claim that it is all garbage, and I asked you to define the difference between the two things and you flatly refused on multilple if not a dozen or more posts to explain your positive claim, I am asking because I am scared that people like you are poisoning the well.
 
I’m waiting. Are you still there? I really have to go to bed, but I would like to get an answer out of you.
 
joshrp said:
Do you actually know what it is? Yes or no.
Click to expand...
You made a claim here, and you refuse to back it up. Your fake concern over my understanding of the matter is irrelevant to your steeping to the plate to stand behind your claims. Which, for some reason you refuse to do.

Advice. Don’t go spouting your mouth off without being able to substantiate what you spout out. You may get someone to challenge your gospel according to you. Catholics do not have to heed your views of personal opinion.
 
StrawberryJam said:
When you made the postive claim that it is all garbage, and I asked you to define the difference between the two things and you flatly refused on multilple if not a dozen or more posts to explain your positive claim, I am asking because I am scared that people like you are poisoning the well.
Click to expand...
It’s like the difference between duck poop and cow poop.
 
Your personal opinion is not backed by Science or the Catholic Church. Goodbye college wanna be Science guy.
 
StrawberryJam said:
I doubt that claim since you are unable for some unkown reason to answer a simple question.
Can you make a distinction between global warming and climate change?
Click to expand...
Your fallacies in logic are showing " Circular Reasoning" is a logic fallacy.

All of Nature changes.

Now can you attribute with observational evidence that a warming temperature is not Nature driven.

AGW lives in models.

Here is Natural Climates observational evidence

To the consternation of global warming proponents,] the Late Ordovician Period was also an Ice Age while at the same time CO2 concentrations then were nearly 12 times higher than today 4400 ppm.

According to greenhouse theory, Earth should have been exceedingly hot. Instead, global temperatures were no warmer than today. Clearly, other factors besides atmospheric carbon influence earth temperatures and global warming.

Or For example, during the Jurassic Period 200 mya ], average CO2 concentrations were about 1800 ppm or about 4.7 times higher than today. The highest concentrations of CO2 during all of the Paleozoic Era occurred during the Cambrian Period, nearly 7000 ppm – about 18 times higher than today.

IN fact:The Carboniferous Period and the Ordovician Period were the only geological periods during the Paleozoic Era when global temperatures were as low as they are today.
 
StrawberryJam said:
Your personal opinion is not backed by Science or the Catholic Church. Goodbye college wanna be Science guy.
Click to expand...
Global warming is when the globe warms up, and climate change is when the climate changes. Pretty simple isn’t it?
 
StrawberryJam said:
You made a claim here, and you refuse to back it up. Your fake concern over my understanding of the matter is irrelevant to your steeping to the plate to stand behind your claims. Which, for some reason you refuse to do.

Advice. Don’t go spouting your mouth off without being able to substantiate what you spout out. You may get someone to challenge your gospel according to you. Catholics do not have to heed your views of personal opinion.
Click to expand...
I can tell you what causes global warming but you are not going to like the answer. It’s called the Sun. Ever heard of it?
 
joshrp said:
I can tell you what causes global warming but you are not going to like the answer. It’s called the Sun. Ever heard of it?
Click to expand...
This is the real basics. I think I learned about this when I was 2.
 
joshrp said:
Why can’t you tell me the distinction between global warming and climate change? Are you asking me because you don’t know or because you want to test me?
Click to expand...
Do not worry about answering the question…it is circular reasoning AND a Question StrawberryJam can not answer.

It is idiotic because it has no value. It provides Nothing because of the fallacy.

Circular reasoning IMO is used by those that don’t have a grasp of logic.

StrawberryJam, by insisting on a answer., shows they don’t understand the question.

Let them answer it.

They need the answer in support of AGW…If they can’t answer it themselves, it undermines the unproven hypothesis of AGW - BUT they don’t understand this fact.

Good Night. 🙂
 
kimmielittle said:
Do not worry about answering the question…it is circular reasoning AND a Question StrawberryJam can not answer.

It is idiotic because it has no value. It provides Nothing because of the fallacy.

Circular reasoning IMO is used by those that don’t have a grasp of logic.

StrawberryJam, by insisting on a answer., shows they don’t understand the question.

Let them answer it.

They need the answer in support of AGW…If they can’t answer it themselves, it undermines the unproven hypothesis of AGW - BUT they don’t understand this fact.

Good Night. 🙂
Click to expand...
Global warming is caused by the Sun, not by man. Sunspot activity has more influence on the weather on this planet more than anything human beings will ever do anytime in the near future.
 
I can tell him exactly what causes global warming, but would Strawberry listen to me?
 
I just want you to make a breakthrough Strawberry. You don’t have to believe a word I say. I just want you to discover a new idea, and not just look at a bunch of words on a screen that don’t mean anything to you.
 
Look up “sunspots and global warming” That should give you something productive to do.
 
Are you going to say goodbye or something, or do I just have to leave without saying farewell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top