Global Warming: Speech by Al Gore filled with vulgarity

[kimmielittle]

Kimmie, I’m curious … do your friends in school REALLY believe that Al Gore invented the internet? Just curious.

No…

But they DID believe much of Mr Gores Inconvenient Truth We were required to buy it - or parents were ] and a teachers claims.

I did a paper on His claims and got a fail grade…But I politely challenged the teacher to investigate my references… My grade was finalized as an A

 

[kimmielittle]

More on CERNS CLOUD

Retracing those 14 years, what if physics had functioned as it is supposed to do? What if CLOUD, quickly approved and funded, had verified the Svensmark effect with all the authority of CERN, in the early 2000s. What if the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had done a responsible job, acknowledging the role of the Sun and curtailing the prophecies of catastrophic warming?

For a start there would have no surprise about the “travesty” that global warming has stopped since the mid-1990s, with the Sun becoming sulky. Vast sums might have been saved on misdirected research and technology, and on climate change fests and wheezes of every kind. The world’s poor and their fragile living environment could have had far more useful help than precautions against warming.

And there would have been less time for so many eminent folk from science, politics, industry, finance, the media and the arts to be taken in by man-made climate catastrophe. (In London, for example, from the Royal Society to the National Theatre.) Sadly for them, in the past ten years they’ve crowded with their warmist badges into a Hall of Shame, like bankers before the crash.
Calder’s Updates, 24 August 2011

wattsupwiththat.com/2011/08/24/breaking-news-cern-experiment-confirms-cosmic-rays-influence-climate-change/

 

[Monte_RCMS]

Hiyas Monte… I Love you, too…and continued prayers ]

Well, let’s see da sea

surf-forecast.com/breaks/Black-Sands-Beach/webcams/latest

Thank you, Kimmie … greatly appreciated. [kinda scarey … we will know more when all the tests are completed.]

 

[Ned_Netterville]

Whether AGW is real or not, the problem is that most of the folks who argue that it is real and presents real dangers to the environment and to earth’s people are folks who want governments–state, national and international–to address the problem through such governmental means as taxation and regulation. But the problem with using government to address AGW or any other matter is that government only operates by force, and therefore always inhibits the freedom of those it taxes and regulates. Consequently, whatever government does only makes matters worse because the freedom lost more than negates anything positive that might come from governmental action.

Some folks who are into AGW, like Gore, are in it for its promise of generating huge amounts of OPM (sounds like opium, is equally addicting, stands for other people’s money), which they plan to mine for their own enrichment or enhancement of power. Others who are sincerely concerned for potential damage to people and places from AGW can demonstrate their sincerity by working outside government channels to relieve the problem. The moment that such sincere folks look to government to expedite a solution to the problem, they become the problem making AGW worse not better. It’s kinda like this: Congress cannot even manage the affairs it is already charged with managing without even balancing the national budget, and you’re asking it to manage the climate??? Get real!

Those who believe that the State can have any positive impact on AGW practice a religion that an eminent economist labeled Statolatry. It seems to me that belief in God and belief in the almighty State are mutually exclusive.

 

[davidmlamb]

I have mentioned at least twice to you….I’m a kid.???

I’m not a Democrat - Republican - Libertarian.

I get an allowance for chores I do.

Asking you again, What motive do you think I have?

GET OUT OF HERE!!! Kimmie if you are a kid YOU BETTER be applying for college at MIT!!! I had thought you might be an experienced chemical or patrolium engineer. Its hard to believe a kid can be talking inelligently about quantum mechanical concepts such as transport proterties Okay Kimmie, please send me a private message and tell me more. By the way I made it to Missouri safely. I have not seen my wife and children in 4 months so I took a week of leave. When I told you I was a junior scientist that meant I was very green. I went back t college whenn In was 42 and received my Bachelors degree in Engineering Physics when I was 46. I then took a year off and worked as an electronic engineer for Life Fitness testing and developing cardio equipment. After a yeasr I applied to graduate school at age 47 and received my Master’sdegree at age 49. Thge In was unemployed for 2 years after interningn with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Rockville, MD. I finally accepted a position with the department of the Navy as a General Engineer and I am currently the Project Engineer for the USS Gunston Hall LSD-44 out of Little Creek Amphibious Base in Virginia, Beach, Va. My wife works in Springfiled, Missouri, she is a Nurse and will not join me for at least a year until I am settled.

Peace,
David

 

[LegoGE1947]

Still can not make a distinction with your backround that should impress us in science?

Can you make the distinction or not? Where do you get your education from?

Who cares if you can not even answer a question.

I always thought it rains and pours when you open a can of Morton Salt!

 

[kimmielittle]

I had thought you might be an experienced chemical or patrolium engineer. Well there is a cute boy who works at a gas station. I don’t really know him… BUT he is the only one I know of in Petroleum.

Its hard to believe a kid can be talking inelligently about quantum mechanical concepts such as transport proterties

 

[kimmielittle]

Continued

Also keep in mind that just because there is no El Nino or La Nina, there is still heating or cooling. ENSO positive that does not get to the level of El Nino will still warm the climate, just a lot less. Same with ENSO negative that does not make the level of La Nina.

Kirsten had a webpage called “Ponder the Maunder” home.earthlink.net/~ponderthemaunder/index.html

She is one of my Role Models

A story about this is here newsbusters.org/node/12968

After all, if a long-range forecast issued April 7 ends up being wrong five weeks later, why on earth would we trust these folks from the U.N. to be able to accurately predict what’s going to happen next year, or fifty to a hundred years from now?

Maybe more important, should we actually enact policy changes that could negatively impact the economy on the recommendations of a group that can’t accurately predict events beyond just a month and a half?

Of course, the other likely more pivotal side of this revelation is whether the scientists involved are just incompetent, or willfully malfeasant. As Kristen wrote in her e-mail message to me, “They were probably trying to scare the people of Australia into signing Kyoto.”

Well, if this is the case, then aren’t all involved participating in a shameful scam?

Think about it. If this is indeed about getting developed nations to agree to the Kyoto Protocol, isn’t the U.N. best served by predicting calamitous climate events regardless of their merit in order to scare the public into complacent support?

Kids have been ripping Mr Gore and UN IPCC claims. Here is just one.

It is note worthy that she doesn’t want to be a Physicist - Meteorologist - Climatologist…She want’s to be an Architect.

I want to be the best Barrel Racer AND maybe a Veterinarian

I have won a couple of scholarships but I doubt attending MIT - Collage is A FACT of my future…BUt I don’t know what I want to be yet.

I’m happy you are safe

 

[kimmielittle]

Kirsten is a good example of the fallacy of such claims as " let me see your scientific credibility" OR " these aren’t climatologists" .

You don’t have to be INTO Science to understand the laws of Science OR what’s missing in a claim.

Teach kids the LAWS of Science… and their applications.

Teach kids to critically read what is claimed…what is missing from those claims…why a claimer may be making such a claim.

Don’t teach kids WHAT to think - Teach them HOW to think.

The LAWS of Science work as well for 12 year olds as it does for 90 year olds.

 

[LegoGE1947]

This tirade of yours IMO is unjustified, uncharitable, uncalled for. IMO

What you OR I do…Does not give us holier than thou rights. You my friend, do not know who or what is devil driven.

You have a belief in AGW…a hypothesis that has the very premise that denies That God’s Nature Controls Climate. A hypothesis started by those and reaffirmed by those who deny this. So Just WHO is diminishing God and His Nature?

I believe in God’s Natural Climate Change. Which has been with us since the dawn.

If people can not understand Good Stewardship is independent of the hypothesis of AGW - That Climate itself will change cooler OR warmer ] weather you believe in AGW or not.

Environmentalism / conservationist issues are not addressed in the hypothesis of AGW - NOR it’s offered solutions. Nothing offered, can "mitigate’ 1C of temperature RISE or FALL.

Science has an important role to play in understanding environmental issues and addressing those issues… IT HAS NO PLACE in POLITICIZED SCIENCE or PROMOTING SCHEMES of diverting economies INTO the Pockets of the RICH. IMO you can not get any closer to unchristian Ideals than this.

We were called to Good Stewardship way before the Church of AGW or the Church of IPCC…AND The Church of Bankers IMF]. Yes, they are Churches of religious beliefs…You with this post has proven that. You have to believe in what they are selling.

It is ironic to me that Catholics ask for Infallibility from Our Holy Fathers - Yet, don’t demand it from these above Churches…Yet…People will preach AGW - IPCC - IMF as if they be…Gospel.

If our Catholic / Christian Churches had so many imperfections as the Hypothesis of AGW’ers / IPCC CLAIMS… would we ignore them???

You have been asked for evidence of claims made…BOTH by you and AGW’ers and IPCC…When presented these questions that go contrary to the direct claims made by them…THEY GET IGNORED…who is the “denier”???

Can they even tell you an optimum temperature for the earth? Is it 0.5 C - 1.5 C degree HIGHER or LOWER than todays temperature??? If you AND THEM can not answer this one simple question…how do you define if UNNATURAL… Warming or Cooling is actually taking place?

Please don’t call people a “denier” until …The log from your own eye is removed.

I’m a Climate Realist…I recognize Climate for what it is…EVER CHANGING.

I understand that Good Stewardship is Independent of these AGW - IPCC Claims.

AND I DO MY BEST…I’m not holier or unholier than you.

Before we Preach…maybe, we should know what can not be done but has been sold by those Churches???

QUESTION: Do you ever let your Carmelite Superior read your posts?

Contrary to what seems to be popular opinion God’s last name is not “Dammit”!

 

[Monte_RCMS]

It doesn’t help Mr. Al Gore’s presentation and argumentation, when we find out that he outright lied about the Polar Bears in order to gain sympathy with little kids.

Little kids can photoshop a picture of a Polar Bear as easily as anyone.

And when Mr. Gore uses a photoshopped picture of a Polar Bear to scare little kids into believing what he is saying, then he should be severely punished.

Ten years at a recycling center doing community service sorting cans and bottles. And no time off … like he got with tour in Vietnam.

 

[Monte_RCMS]

OK … HERE’S THE LATEST FROM AL GORE!

Listen up!

“If you don’t believe his polar bear stories, then YOU’RE a racist”.

No joke:

dailycaller.com/2011/08/28/gore-global-warming-skeptics-are-this-generations-racists/

 

[kimmielittle]

OK … HERE’S THE LATEST FROM AL GORE!

Listen up!

“If you don’t believe his polar bear stories, then YOU’RE a racist”.

No joke:

dailycaller.com/2011/08/28/gore-global-warming-skeptics-are-this-generations-racists/

Dear Mr Gore.

I know you think you are now a Californian, where family histories fade into…

But Sir, you forget where you come from. In the South, family histories are repeated on the front porch after the days chores.

Mr Gore, does this name ring a bell? Morris Haddox in 1974 Nashville.
Isn’t that how you got famous?

“The purpose of this policy was the routine investigation without probable cause of prominent elected and appointed black officials in major metropolitan areas throughout the United States. I learned from my conversations with special agents of the FBI that the basis for this policy was the assumption by the FBI that black officials were intellectually and socially incapable of governing major governmental organizations and institutions.”

larouchepub.com/other/2007/3414racist_gore.html

What about the Civil Rights Act?
Plus the Al Gore Sr attempted Amendment to it?

nationalcenter.org/P21NVDavisGore599.html

This claim IMO is as intelligently thought out as your Tobacco claim or when you said “Al Gore claimed on Friday that scientists involved in advancing the theory of global warming wouldn’t do it just for the money”.

You must have read the CERN CLOUD results

 

[davidmlamb]

The Lord has declared me the bearer of truth and the winnern ofb this debate. I want to thank all my supporters out there and my opponasnts I wish better luck next time:thumbsup:

Peace,

The Super Saved One

 

[kimmielittle]

The Lord has declared me the bearer of truth and the winnern ofb this debate. I want to thank all my supporters out there and my opponasnts I wish better luck next time:
Peace,

The Super Saved One

 

[kimmielittle]

A number of years ago - I provided information on REALCLIMATE.ORG

Here is a must read if you use them as reference.

populartechnology.net/2009/07/truth-about-realclimateorg.html

I also took on Wikipedia and Mr Connelly as a reference.

populartechnology.net/2008/11/anti-wikipedia-resource.html

 

[lynnvinc]

Who is culpable for Al Gore’s profanity?

It occurred to me the other day when I did something that ticked off my husband and he cursed under his breath (sometimes he even shouts his curses)…that I was partly to blame for that.

Same way those who insisted on refusing to mitigate anthropogenic climate change, no matter how dangerous the scientists and environmentalists like Gore tell us it is, and no matter how many times the popes and bishops tell us we have a moral responsibility to mitigate it…they are at least in part responsible for people who sincerely believe failing to mitigate will cause great harm and death (whether you all believe it or not) getting upset and cursing.

It’s always a good habit for us to look at our own sins, and not so much at the sins of others. It’s, of course, nice that we want them to go to heaven and we don’t give at #$#*# about ourselves going to h__l (oops, excuse my french), but it is really important for us to take care of our own souls. Sort of like when they tell you in the airplane to put the oxygen mask on yourself first before attending to others.

That’s why I would suggest it might be good (from your view) to humor those “warmers” by agreeing to do all you can to mitigate AGW, at least those things that will make you healthier, wealthier, and freer – which should get a person down to cutting their GHGs by 25 to 50%, perhaps more.

We need to work on overcoming the great polarization & concomitant demonization that has occurred. It’s not healthy for anyone.

 

[kimmielittle]

Who is culpable for Al Gore’s profanity?

Mr Gore Is

It occurred to me the other day when I did something that ticked off my husband and he cursed under his breath (sometimes he even shouts his curses)…that I was partly to blame for that.

Nonsense…That is not Catholic teaching. We are responsible for our sins once reaching the age or reason.

“Sally made me do it” Just never went over real well with ANY of my Priests - Guardians - Teachers …

Same way those who insisted on refusing to mitigate anthropogenic climate change,

You can’t “mitigate” what isn’t a problem.

Mr Gore is not an environmentalist.

He’s a “capitalist” profiteer.

A social concerns leader wouldn’t have ONE house…that uses more energy than I do in 40 plus years.

:It says the figures show the Gore residence uses an average of 17,768 kWh per month –1,638 kWh more energy per month than before the renovations.

By comparison, the average American household consumes 11,040 kWh in an entire year, according to the Energy Information Administration.

telegraph.co.uk/news/worl…ated-roof.html

A social concerns leader wouldn’t be involved with one of the greatest economic scams known… the carbon trading industry.

:While Mr. Gore is raising concerns and creating a market for “green” technologies, Silver Spring Networks is matching these concerns with a steady stream of profitable products, thanks to government subsidies.** There is no greater form of rent-seeking than creating a market and obtaining government funding to maintain market share. **And it appears that this is precisely what Mr. Gore is doing when he declares our imminent doom in the face of supposed catastrophic climate change.

cfact.org/a/1601/Do-Al-Go…l-warming-myth

A social concerns leader wouldn’t charge $100,000 to present his “Science”
The Five page contract here thesmokinggun.com/file/al…000-man?page=1

Yet, Not debate the flaws within his presentation.

Mr Gore is a political activist , a “capitalist” investment player. Nothing more.

IMO He’s a angry little person who sees his business ventures in real danger and he can’t garner more subsidies. from the government - Because His Claims don’t match observational evidence. I think most of the Public agrees with my Opinion of Mr Gore.

 

[Monte_RCMS]

Mr Gore Is

Nonsense…That is not Catholic teaching. We are responsible for our sins once reaching the age or reason.

“Sally made me do it” Just never went over real well with ANY of my Priests - Guardians - Teachers …

You can’t “mitigate” what isn’t a problem.

Mr Gore is not an environmentalist.

He’s a “capitalist” profiteer.

A social concerns leader wouldn’t have ONE house…that uses more energy than I do in 40 plus years.

telegraph.co.uk/news/worl…ated-roof.html

A social concerns leader wouldn’t be involved with one of the greatest economic scams known… the carbon trading industry.

cfact.org/a/1601/Do-Al-Go…l-warming-myth

A social concerns leader wouldn’t charge $100,000 to present his “Science”
The Five page contract here thesmokinggun.com/file/al…000-man?page=1

Yet, Not debate the flaws within his presentation.

Mr Gore is a political activist , a “capitalist” investment player. Nothing more.

IMO He’s a angry little person who sees his business ventures in real danger and he can’t garner more subsidies. from the government - Because His Claims don’t match observational evidence. I think most of the Public agrees with my Opinion of Mr Gore.

IMHO, Mr. Gore is angry because he believes he SHOULD have been president of the United States. He came very close and, for him and for all true-believer liberals, very close is good enough.

He believed all the good stuff told to him by the likes of Albert A. Gore, Sr. and by Armand Hammer.

In any very close contest, the liberals believe they should prevail.

And … stunningly … a lot of people really believe that. Which is why they demanded that the Republican Congress a few years ago should have “shared power” … and the Republicans, ever eager to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory … acceded to their request.

What a bunch!!

Where do we find people like this!!

Inspiring, not!!

Seriously: govexec.com/dailyfed/0101/010801cd.htm

old.nationalreview.com/york/york110502.asp

And more recently:

redstate.com/brian_d/2010/12/23/senate-democrats-poised-for-power-grab/

 

[lynnvinc]

IMHO, Mr. Gore is angry because he believes he SHOULD have been president of the United States.

I think the reason he went on the road to promote climate change awareness is because he felt guilty for not bringing it up as an issue during the election…which could have made lots of people aware. McCain was not ashamed or afraid to bring it up, even though it probably cost him the primary.

I’m fairly certain Gore genuinely and firmly believes GW is a real problem…he listens to the many many scientists who say so. His anger comes from frustration at the obstinance of the skeptics and denialists, and I can understand that.

I know I’ve been attacked so much by denialists I nearly decided 3 years ago just to keep quiet about GW (tho I weep inside for those who are dying and will be dying from it) – I figured I’d just continue doing what I could to mitigate in my personal life, and the sin would be on those who refuse to do so, and that was very sad, but I’d been totally ineffective in trying to tell them – then a day later at Mass those readings we had today came up, and I knew I had to keep speaking out, no matter how much I’m attacked:

"If I say to someone wicked, ‘Evil- doer, you are to die,’ and you do not speak to warn the wicked person to renounce such ways, the wicked person will die for this guilt, but I shall hold you responsible for the death.

If, however, you do warn someone wicked to renounce such ways and repent, and that person does not repent, then the culprit will die for this guilt, but you yourself will have saved your life." Ez 33:7-9.
and

"If your brother does something wrong, go and have it out with him alone, between your two selves. If he listens to you, you have won back your brother.

If he does not listen, take one or two others along with you: whatever the misdemeanour, the evidence of two or three witnesses is required to sustain the charge.

But if he refuses to listen to these, report it to the community; and if he refuses to listen to the community, treat him like a gentile or a tax collector." Matt 18:15-20.