Gnostic Elements in Early Catholicism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel_Keeran
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Catholics believe that scripture is only ONE LEG of Catholic dogmas and belief. The other leg is sacred tradition, passed on from Christ himself to the apostles and then on to all the Catholics who have lived.

Actually, about purgatory, I don’t even see how you can claim that it came from Plato–and never mind about the Gnostics, who came later. Read the arguments of the early church fathers. Did even one of them bring up Plato’s lake of purification? All the arguments were centered on “Abraham’s bosom”. And also, there is no belief that every person has to go to purgatory.

I am puzzled by your response.

May God grant you a million miracles, Annem
Lazarus went to Abraham’s bosom but there is no mention of purification needed there. And there is no idea in the New Testament of purgatory or a place after death where one goes to be purified, as one finds in Plato and in Catholic purgatory, and in gnostic rivers of fire before being judged as purified by the Virgin of Light.
 
The verse referring to being perfect is about loving one’s enemies, not about the notion catholic of achieving perfection by purification through suffering.
Why do you think Christ only meant it about loving your enemies?

Paul said, “let us go on to perfection.”

Jesus made all the Old Testament laws much, much harder, since we now had the graces given by the sacraments and by the church. The Old Testament said to commit adultery was wrong. Christ said, “whoever looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery in his heart”.

May God grant you a million miracles, Annem
 
  1. One does not find the idea of higher levels of holiness as in a special class of perfected ones, gnostic pneumatics, Greek philosophers, and catholic saints. One does not find ascetic contemplative practice as the way to achieve the perfected state, as in the way to achieve gnosis, contemplation in Pythagoras/Socrates/Plato, and monastic religious orders in catholicism.
Gnostics didn’t arrive until a hundred years after Christianity.

Second temple Jews were strict monotheists and never borrowed from Hellenistic cults.

But as far as higher levels of holiness, what about first, Christ? He was celibate and called everyone to take up your cross and follow him.

Next, within 20 years, we have Paul. “A eunuch for Christ” who experiences visions of the seventh heaven and may even have had the stigmata. And God knows he suffered. He was always being scourged, nearly died from it, lived in prison for a time–indeed, he is the perfect portrait of a Catholic saint. So how can you say Catholics didn’t have the idea of true holiness by 20 years after Christ? Clearly, they had. And some were living witnesses to it.

May God grant you a million miracles, Annem ,
 
. One does not find the idea that deceased perfected ones ascend directly to heaven while deceased imperfect ones go through a period of purification in the gnostic rivers of fire, Plato’s lake of purification, or catholic purgatory as described by some ECF’s.
Daniel, why don’t you believe me about the Gnostics? Really, all you have to do is get Petrement’s “A Separate God” which everyone considers the most important book on the Gnostics.

Look, I double dog dare you to find a Gnostic before a hundred years after Christ. Let me cut to the chase: you can’t. There aren’t any,. None. Zero.

Yes, there were a lot of scholars arguing that there were Gnostics at the time of Paul (the 1 Cor quote). Alas for their arguments, all the searching they did found…nothing. And then came Petrement’s book and they were all blown out of the water.

Do you know anything of the history of how some scholars thought the GNostics were around earlier came about? It all centered on the Gospel of Thomas. Which was fine until lots of scholars–Nicholas Perrin for one–proved that Thomas was derived from the Diatessaron. Bye bye pet theory of Crossan.

Please research it yourself. It’s easy enough to prove.

May God grant you a million miracles, Annem
 
  1. One does not find the idea that the celibate state is more holy than the married state, as one finds in gnosticism, Plato, and catholicism necessitating the perpetual virginity of Mary.
Then why did Jesus say: “There are eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He who is able to accept it, let him accept it” Matt 19

And by the way, Christ was celibate. And he is clearly here asking those who can accept it to be eunuchs for the sake of the church.

Then came Paul, who was celibate and said “Then I say to the unmarried and to the widows: It is good for them if they remain even as I am; but if they cannot exercise self control, let them marry” 1 Cor.

And then there is Rev 14 “behold, a Lamb…and with him one hundred and forty four thousand having his Father’s name written on their foreheads…These are the ones who are not defiled with women, for they are virgins”.

Pretty clear line of celibates and celebration of giving up your life for Christ. And not a Gnostic among them.

May God grant you a million miracles.

Annem
 
Then why did Jesus say: “There are eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He who is able to accept it, let him accept it” Matt 19

And by the way, Christ was celibate. And he is clearly here asking those who can accept it to be eunuchs for the sake of the church.

Then came Paul, who was celibate and said “Then I say to the unmarried and to the widows: It is good for them if they remain even as I am; but if they cannot exercise self control, let them marry” 1 Cor.

And then there is Rev 14 “behold, a Lamb…and with him one hundred and forty four thousand having his Father’s name written on their foreheads…These are the ones who are not defiled with women, for they are virgins”.

Pretty clear line of celibates and celebration of giving up your life for Christ. And not a Gnostic among them.

May God grant you a million miracles.

Annem
Celibacy seems off the topic of this Thread, but since you brought it up, there’s really no basis to assume Paul was a life-long celibate. When he wrote 1 Cor he was celibate, but we have no idea if that was because he was never married, or a widower, or divorced.

And this ONE statement in ONE letter is absolutely no basis to assume (as many did, long after Paul) that St. Paul was holding the celibate life as holier than married life.
 
The verse referring to being perfect is about loving one’s enemies, not about the notion catholic of achieving perfection by purification through suffering.
It’s occurred to me that you have never read the letter of Ignatius. Dated to about 110. Or 1 Clement, dated to about 95 AD. They both show quite clearly a functioning, organized church, and yes, there certainly is a Catholic sense of suffering, not to mention a bishop in Rome with authority.

here is a quote from one of Ignatius’ letters. He has been condemned for his Christianity to be eaten by beasts in Rome. See if this doesn’t sound exactly like a Catholic saint, and all before a single Gnostic arrived:

Here is Ignatius:“I am writing to all the Chruches to tell them all that I die willingly for God, as long as you do not hinder me. I beseech you not to show me unreasonable kindness. Allow me to become the food of the wild beasts, for through them I will reach God. I am God’s wheat; let me be ground by the teeth of the wild beasts, that I may be found Christ’s pure bread. Better still, entice the wild beasts to become my tomb and to leave no part of my body behind. Then, when I am dead, I will no longer be a burden to anyone. Only then shall I truly be a disciple of Jesus Christ, when the world will not see so much as my body. Entreat Christ on my behalf that, through these instruments, I may become God’s sacrifice”.

you can google the letter of Ignatius and 1 Clement and read them right now. I’ll bet they’ll clear up a lot of doubts. 😉

May God grant you a million miracles, Annem
 
  1. One does not find the notion that everyone is corrupted by the fact they are born into evil flesh, as one finds in the gnostic idea of the evil material world and the catholic idea of inherited sin at conception thus necessitating the immaculate conception of Mary…
Early quotes:

Paul: Through one man (Adam) sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned Rom 5

Paul again: As in Adan all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. 1 Cor 15:33

Paul again: I know that in me (that is, my flesh) nothing good lives Rom 7

The human race…from Adam had fallen under the power of death and the guile of the serpent. Justin Martyr 160–1:243

May God grant you a million miracles, Annem 🙂
 
Why do you think Christ only meant it about loving your enemies?

Paul said, “let us go on to perfection.”

Jesus made all the Old Testament laws much, much harder, since we now had the graces given by the sacraments and by the church. The Old Testament said to commit adultery was wrong. Christ said, “whoever looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery in his heart”.

May God grant you a million miracles, Annem
Read the context of “be perfect as your Father is perfect” and you will see it about love for enemies. Paul’s reference to perfection is about unity not the catholic/Greek/gnostic idea of perfection/purification through contemplation/asceticism/penance/suffering/purgatory.

2 Corinthians 13:11
Finally, brothers, good-by. Aim for perfection, listen to my appeal, be of one mind, live in peace. And the God of love and peace will be with you.
 
here is that verese again-

“For behold I was conceived in iniquities; and in sins did my mother conceive me” (Paslms 50:7)

newadvent.org/bible/psa050.htm

original sin? I believe so.
Not at all. David like Job, was speaking of his own personal sin and remorse over his sins of adultery/murder. He was not stating a theology of inherited sin. If so Ezekiel did not agree.

Ezekiel 18:20
“The person who sins will die The son will not bear the punishment for the father’s iniquity, nor will the father bear the punishment for the son’s iniquity; the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself.”
 
Early quotes:

Paul: Through one man (Adam) sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned Rom 5

Paul again: As in Adan all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. 1 Cor 15:33

Paul again: I know that in me (that is, my flesh) nothing good lives Rom 7

The human race…from Adam had fallen under the power of death and the guile of the serpent. Justin Martyr 160–1:243

May God grant you a million miracles, Annem 🙂
“death spread to all men, because ALL SINNED” Rom 5

Paul did not intend to teach a doctrine of inherited sin but rather a doctrine that Christ is saviour to both Jew and Gentile. Otherwise, he would be saying all are separated from God from the moment of conception and because of their inherent evil, are doomed to eternal separation from God if they die as aborted infants without baptism.
 
It’s occurred to me that you have never read the letter of Ignatius. Dated to about 110. Or 1 Clement, dated to about 95 AD. They both show quite clearly a functioning, organized church, and yes, there certainly is a Catholic sense of suffering, not to mention a bishop in Rome with authority.

here is a quote from one of Ignatius’ letters. He has been condemned for his Christianity to be eaten by beasts in Rome. See if this doesn’t sound exactly like a Catholic saint, and all before a single Gnostic arrived:

Here is Ignatius:“I am writing to all the Chruches to tell them all that I die willingly for God, as long as you do not hinder me. I beseech you not to show me unreasonable kindness. Allow me to become the food of the wild beasts, for through them I will reach God. I am God’s wheat; let me be ground by the teeth of the wild beasts, that I may be found Christ’s pure bread. Better still, entice the wild beasts to become my tomb and to leave no part of my body behind. Then, when I am dead, I will no longer be a burden to anyone. Only then shall I truly be a disciple of Jesus Christ, when the world will not see so much as my body. Entreat Christ on my behalf that, through these instruments, I may become God’s sacrifice”.

you can google the letter of Ignatius and 1 Clement and read them right now. I’ll bet they’ll clear up a lot of doubts. 😉

May God grant you a million miracles, Annem
I have read these letters. If Ignatius went to be martyred willingly and had a faithful choice to avoid it, he was indeed misguided. He should have been hindered by the church if possible and without denial of Christ.
 
Then why did Jesus say: “There are eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He who is able to accept it, let him accept it” Matt 19

And by the way, Christ was celibate. And he is clearly here asking those who can accept it to be eunuchs for the sake of the church.

Then came Paul, who was celibate and said “Then I say to the unmarried and to the widows: It is good for them if they remain even as I am; but if they cannot exercise self control, let them marry” 1 Cor.

And then there is Rev 14 “behold, a Lamb…and with him one hundred and forty four thousand having his Father’s name written on their foreheads…These are the ones who are not defiled with women, for they are virgins”.

Pretty clear line of celibates and celebration of giving up your life for Christ. And not a Gnostic among them.

May God grant you a million miracles.

Annem
Yours is a catholic/gnostic reading into scripture. No where does Jesus or Paul say celibates are more holy than married having an active sex life. Celibacy is a gift and not superior to married Christians. Paul makes clear no gift is superior to others.
 
Daniel, why don’t you believe me about the Gnostics? Really, all you have to do is get Petrement’s “A Separate God” which everyone considers the most important book on the Gnostics.

Look, I double dog dare you to find a Gnostic before a hundred years after Christ. Let me cut to the chase: you can’t. There aren’t any,. None. Zero.

Yes, there were a lot of scholars arguing that there were Gnostics at the time of Paul (the 1 Cor quote). Alas for their arguments, all the searching they did found…nothing. And then came Petrement’s book and they were all blown out of the water.

Do you know anything of the history of how some scholars thought the GNostics were around earlier came about? It all centered on the Gospel of Thomas. Which was fine until lots of scholars–Nicholas Perrin for one–proved that Thomas was derived from the Diatessaron. Bye bye pet theory of Crossan.

Please research it yourself. It’s easy enough to prove.

May God grant you a million miracles, Annem
There were most certainly docetic/gnostic “Christians” during the writing of the New Testament. They were the ones who believed Christ did not come in the flesh.

1 John 4:2
By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God;
2 John 1:7
For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh This is the deceiver and the antichrist.

Paul also refers to those who practice harsh treatment of the body and forbid marriage. Thes are due to docetic tendencies already popular in Roman society because of Greek influence.
 
But as far as higher levels of holiness, what about first, Christ? He was celibate and called everyone to take up your cross and follow him.
Now annem, are saying Christ calls everyone to celibacy? This is very gnostic, even more than any Catholic I have heard from. There were some gnostics who taught no one could enter heaven unless they were celibate. Encratites of Syria were very extreme on this point, and this was a center of monastic development along wiht Egypt where gnosticism thrived.
 
Read the context of “be perfect as your Father is perfect” and you will see it about love for enemies.
Sorry, but I think you need to consider the entire context. Jesus gives the beatitudes, which are the things God promises to those who want to be Christians. Then he gives injunctions of what we must do if we want to live as Christians. At the very end, in a summation of all that he wants from us, he says: 'Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly father is perfect." Here is Matthew 5, which I have hacked to pieces for the sake of brevity:.

14"You are the light of the world…let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven…Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.

"You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not murder,[a] and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.’ 22But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brotherwill be subject to judgment. …
23"Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to your brother; then come and offer your gift.
… 27"You have heard that it was said, ‘Do not commit adultery.’[e] 28But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. 30And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.
Divorce
31"It has been said, ‘Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.’[f] 32But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery.
Oaths
33"Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not break your oath, but keep the oaths you have made to the Lord.’ 34But I tell you, Do not swear at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne; 35or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. 36And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. 37Simply let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.
An Eye for an Eye
38"You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[g] 39But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. 40And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. 41If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. 42Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.
Love for Enemies
43"You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[h] and hate your enemy.’ 44But I tell you: Love your enemies* and pray for those who persecute you, 45that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48
Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.***

This is exactly like the long passage from Moses, where Moses goes on for pages and pages about what the Jews must do to live as God wants. Then, in the end, he sums it up with: ( Deuteronomy 30) “I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life”

It is set up so exactly like the passages in Deut. that I can’t see how you can’t call “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect” as the summation of all that we are to do.

Comments? May God grant you a million miracles, Annem**
 
Paul did not intend to teach a doctrine of inherited sin but rather a doctrine that Christ is saviour to both Jew and Gentile. Otherwise, he would be saying all are separated from God from the moment of conception and because of their inherent evil, are doomed to eternal separation from God if they die as aborted infants without baptism.
omans 5:12 Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned–
Code:
13 To be sure, sin was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not charged against anyone's account where there is no law. 14 Nevertheless, death reigned from the time of Adam to the time of Moses, even over those who did not sin by breaking a command, as did Adam, who is a pattern of the one to come.

15 But the gift is not like the trespass. For if the many died by the trespass of the one man, how much more did God's grace and the gift that came by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, overflow to the many! 16 Nor can the gift of God be compared with the result of one man's sin: The judgment followed one sin and brought condemnation, but the gift followed many trespasses and brought justification. 17 For if, by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man, how much more will those who receive God's abundant provision of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man, Jesus Christ!

18 C***onsequently, just as one trespass resulted in condemnation for all people, so also one righteous act resulted in justification and life for all. 19 For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous.***

20 The law was brought in so that the trespass might increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more, 21 so that, just as sin reigned in death, so also grace might reign through righteousness to bring eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
How do you explain “for just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners” except as original sin? it was how all the early church father translated it. It was how Augustine translated it. It was how Calvin translated it.

May God grant you a million miracles, Annem
 
I have read these letters. If Ignatius went to be martyred willingly and had a faithful choice to avoid it, he was indeed misguided. He should have been hindered by the church if possible and without denial of Christ.
I don’t think the saints who went to their death because of the Romans were misguided, but then I am a Catholic. And the martyrs continue. Just the last century, there were more Catholics martyred for their faith than at any time in history, 40 million according to one book.

At any rate, it clearly shows that the doctrine of trying to be perfect as Christ was perfect, and the willingness to suffer for Christ was always present.

May God grant you a million miracles, ANnem
 
Yours is a catholic/gnostic reading into scripture. No where does Jesus or Paul say celibates are more holy than married having an active sex life. Celibacy is a gift and not superior to married Christians. Paul makes clear no gift is superior to others.
Well, it’s certainly not Gnostic because there weren’t any Gnostics around at the time.

However, yes, Jesus does say those who can be eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom should be. Aren’t you parsing things a little too closely here? There is the clear passage from Christ himself, and the minor one from Paul indicating that celibacy was good. It is therefore rock solid that celibacy for the sake of the kingdom was encouraged from the time of Christ. What more do you need for proof that it was therefore present in the church from the start? 🤷

Puzzled, but May God grant you a million miracles, Annem
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top