Gnostics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Palatine
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Palatine

Guest
I’ve been in long discussions with a cradle-Catholic gone Gnostic for about a year (Sad too, since I basicly saw her getting farther and farther away from the Church as it happened…)

We’ve had a lot of interesting conversations about various theological things. Eventually our emails got so long and packed with theology I nicknamed them “Epistles to the Pilgrim.” But, point remaing is she seems to get farther and farther away every time we talk.

So, I was wondering if we have any Gnostic converts (not to be confused with agnostic) or anything with a deeper understanding of gnostic belief so I could get a better understanding of what she believes (she herself is pretty bad at explaining or defending what she believes, but rejects any point I make that she can’t refute. "Basicly a “I hear ya, but no thanks.” response)

Gnostics confuse the heck out of me… :banghead:
 
The Nag Hammadi writings contain some of the most complete collection of Gnostic writing

Nag Hammadi

nag-hammadi.com/

Gnostic is a term that covers a wide range of beliefs

IIRC the basic tenant that they have in common is that the world is basically evil but that there are a few people with the “divine spark” who are trapped here. Jesus was sent to save them.
It generally appeals to those who think that they are misunderstood or different than those around them…teenagers basically

The problem with all of this is that those without the spark aren’t savable…they aren’t even fully human. Scary doctrine

I’ve heard two Gnostic creation myths. IIRC The more elaborate goes something like this: There is one perfect transcendent God who created lesser gods
One of these Sophia created yet another god… Yahweh. (the same Yahweh as in the OT) And Yahweh created the earth and humans. Since Yahweh was a step removed from the pure, perfect god he was flawed that explains the evil in the world and all that smiting in the OT. Jesus was sent by the perfect pure God to save Humans from Yahweh’s flawed creation.

wickapedia is your friend
 
40.png
Palatine:
I’ve been in long discussions with a cradle-Catholic gone Gnostic for about a year (Sad too, since I basicly saw her getting farther and farther away from the Church as it happened…)

We’ve had a lot of interesting conversations about various theological things. Eventually our emails got so long and packed with theology I nicknamed them “Epistles to the Pilgrim.” But, point remaing is she seems to get farther and farther away every time we talk.

So, I was wondering if we have any Gnostic converts (not to be confused with agnostic) or anything with a deeper understanding of gnostic belief so I could get a better understanding of what she believes (she herself is pretty bad at explaining or defending what she believes, but rejects any point I make that she can’t refute. "Basicly a “I hear ya, but no thanks.” response)

Gnostics confuse the heck out of me… :banghead:
She sounds like pinning her beliefs down is like nailing Jello to a wall. A study of gnosticism will probably not shed much light on this. Pray for her and be the most holy Catholic you can be.

Scott
 
Steve Andersen:
IIRC the basic tenant that they have in common is that the world is basically evil but that there are a few people with the “divine spark” who are trapped here. Jesus was sent to save them.
It generally appeals to those who think that they are misunderstood or different than those around them…teenagers basically

The problem with all of this is that those without the spark aren’t savable…they aren’t even fully human. Scary doctrine

I’ve heard two Gnostic creation myths. IIRC The more elaborate goes something like this: There is one perfect transcendent God who created lesser gods
One of these Sophia created yet another god… Yahweh. (the same Yahweh as in the OT) And Yahweh created the earth and humans. Since Yahweh was a step removed from the pure, perfect god he was flawed that explains the evil in the world and all that smiting in the OT. Jesus was sent by the perfect pure God to save Humans from Yahweh’s flawed creation.
What you are describing sounds like Manicheeism. I’m not sure it qualifies as a form of Gnosticism. Insofar as I can tell, the only common thread to gnosticism is the claim to a special secret knowledge (“gnosis”) handed down by the Apostles to a select few. It could be argued that LDS are modern Gnostics, though it would be dangerous to push such analogies too far.

Some forms of Gnosticism were very strongly influenced by Platonism and Eastern Mysticism, and showed some similarities to early Buddhism.

Irenicist
 
40.png
Irenicist:
What you are describing sounds like Manicheeism. I’m not sure it qualifies as a form of Gnosticism. …
IIRC it is the Persian veriety of Gnosticism
but I’ve been worng before

but you’re right the term covers a wide range of theologies

PS I meant Yaldabaoth not Yahweh…sorry :o
 
Thanks for the info everyone, but I made a flaw in not distinguishing my friend’s version of gnosticism. As opposed to being the Christian heresy of the 2nd century…my friend follows a more…“universalist” kind. Eastern Spirituality is obviously imbued in it. To her (and to her gnostic friend who is seemingly teaching her most of this) Jesus was just one other Christ in a big line who try and teach people how to live. They seem to draw a lot on the teachings of Samael Aur Woer, if the name rings any bells. They also believe is some really funky “become chaste by having intercourse” system called the Arcanum AZF. The one thing they do have in common with the 2nd century gnostics is that they have no problem drawing interpretations from the Bible that are absolutely rediculous–such as support for the Arcanum thing mentioned above. G’uh…

Sorry for the misunderstanding
 
personally I blame “The Matrix”

all that “the world is not real” & “only a select few know the truth” stuff
pure Gnostic
 
I’d recommend thse two articles. They are from a non-Catholic source and I don’t recommend everything on their site, but these are the best I’ve seen on the topic.

Gnosticism and the Gnostic Jesus
iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0040a.html

The Gnostic Gospels: Part Two
iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0088a.html

Also, I’d recommend reading the apologetics articles available on the “The Da Vinci Code”, a book that is heavily gnostic in it’s influence. Here’s a link to a website by Carl Olsen, who has also written the best book on this subject, “The Da Vinci Hoax.” This book has lengthy chapters on Gnostic history and thought:

carl-olson.com/abouttdvc.html
 
Steve Andersen:
personally I blame “The Matrix”

all that “the world is not real” & “only a select few know the truth” stuff
pure Gnostic
Thank you,
I agree that was one of the worst movies of all time.
 
Catholic Dude:
Thank you,
I agree that was one of the worst movies of all time.
To get off topic, a teacher told me, basically, read Plato’s The Cave Analogy. It’s the same thing. AND, since I already did that, WHOO-HOO!!! No work for adstrinity!! 😃
 
Also, I’d recommend reading the apologetics articles available on the “The Da Vinci Code”, a book that is heavily gnostic in it’s influence. Here’s a link to a website by Carl Olsen, who has also written the best book on this subject, “The Da Vinci Hoax.” This book has lengthy chapters on Gnostic history and thought:

I’m not sure why everyone is all over The Da Vinci Code, especially since its fiction. I would think people would complain more about “Holy Blood, Holy Grail”. This book at least claims some scholarship (whether you believe it or not), and is the research Da Vinci is based on. I guess people are hammering Da Vinci because its a best seller, and the other is not.

The only thing I know about gnostics is 1) they believe in a resurrection, but during life. They don’t know what happens after you die, and 2) they like to go inward to find God, an idea I hear Catholics aren’t too fond of.

Oh, yeah. As to what you’re friend is into: I don’t know what that is.
 
40.png
AdsoOfFunkstown:
I’m not sure why everyone is all over The Da Vinci Code, especially since its fiction. I would think people would complain more about “Holy Blood, Holy Grail”. This book at least claims some scholarship (whether you believe it or not), and is the research Da Vinci is based on. I guess people are hammering Da Vinci because its a best seller, and the other is not.

.
The reason many are all over DVC is because the book’s fans are playing three-card monte with the truth. That is, they will recommend or give the book to people who are not very knowledgeable on the subject and either say or imply that it is true. When someone with knowledge calls them on it, they dive down their convenient escape hatch: “It’s just fiction! Don’t be so uptight!”

Also, imagine someone writing a work of fiction which included the idea that the Holocaust was a hoax. We would hear howls of protests and justifiably so.

Scott
 
Scott Waddell:
Also, imagine someone writing a work of fiction which included the idea that the Holocaust was a hoax. We would hear howls of protests and justifiably so.
Perhaps. But I would have no problem with Holocaust-denial even in a book that claimed to be fact, as long as it had some research to back it up. I think people should be able to write what they want and let it find its own level in the market of ideas. I guess that’s why I have no problem with Da Vinci.

I really didn’t find Da Vinci to be a very interesting book, actually. I thought Holy Blood was much more interesting, I guess because it claims to be true. I wonder what the RCC thinks of that book?
 
Why am I not surprised that your gnostic friend is female? I think Elaine Pagels has promoted some theory that gnosticism is the friend of the female and if they embrace this theory they will have all the power and glory for themselves.

Lisa N
 
As the “Gnostic friend” of Palatine herself, I figured I’d step in for a moment or two, and address something: in a following post, I’ll talk more about my “beliefs,” if you’re curious.
Code:
 But firstly, I'd like to thank you those who have prayed or are praying for me.  It’s kind of you.
About “The Matrix,” The Da Vinci Code, movies, books…

I’m learning how many terrible things, untruths, and images movies and books contain. I’ve seen “The Matrix,” and its sequels, and they contain** tons** of awful things: violence, explicit and lustful sex, a great deal of egotism and arrogance, images that steal our attention away from God.
Code:
 And while I have not read The Da Vinci Code, (and perhaps this gives me no right to say what I'm about to say) I'm almost positive that if it contains any semblance of truths, they are amidst many lies, many distortions.
Thats all, really, about that. 🙂
 
The problem with “pinning my beliefs down” is that, truthfully, I know that, ultimately, I don’t know anything for sure. And I don’t ever want to pretend to myself that I do. For a long time I had troubles with this. I don’t want to assert that “I believe this! Firmly! Without question!” As a friend once told another friend, I would much rather walk a path, than sit down and claim to know it to its end.
Code:
  Much like many of you, I suppose, I believe believing alone will not do anything good.

  But also, I'm realizing that I simply must believe in something, follow *something*. Even if my view is cloudy, even if I can be wrong, or that I could follow a doctrine and do practices that are entirely a worthless waste of my time... it is best to try, rather than to float through life with a few flimsy ideas about God or existence or purpose. Which is what I forsee myself doing, and have done many times, in my daily life, even after beginning to adopt Gnostic practices. Following the desire, the whim of the moment, rather than keeping God above of all things, work or leasure. And my concept of God may not match actuality—and how could it, inside such a flawed, narrow-minded person?
And so, I feel that Samael Aun Weor’s teachings, speak to me. Perhaps I’ll never be rid of my egos, perhaps I’m going straight to Hell, but, surely, I want to try to be pure, to be chaste, to be compassionate, to be humble.

Just as you might be, I am imperfect, selfish, and unworthy of any Graces… but I want to do the will of God, just the same, and I feel that this religion… in its extremity, and its difficulty in some aspects, might practically allow me to do so.

Catholicism contains many wonderful aspects, teachings, rituals, but, finding it better to come to a temporary and perhaps fallible conclusion than no conclusion, I believe it does not contain the entirety of Truth. Perhaps I misunderstand Catholicism.

And, whatever “I” really am, I am truly nothing. That to think myself anything, capable of anything without God, that’d be foolish. We are all mere marionettes, and our single power is to choose who holds our strings, from moment to moment, from day to day, who is in control of our actions, our thoughts, our feelings.

I also know that I have many, many faults within me: parts that are Lustful, Lazy, Gluttonous, Envious… Self-observation, realizing that those terrible "I"s, selfish monsters who desire, desire, are somehow separate from whatever “I” actually am as best I can from “moment to moment”: and by not identifying with them (as one Audiolecture I enjoy stated, “instead of saying ‘I am ANGRY!’ realizing at a moment of anger 'an “I” is angry.”) I’m better able to handle that anger, and deal with a situation with maybe a little more compassion, than if I were dominated by a whimsy, selfish feeling. But, it’s not easy to go against desires.
Code:
  If any of you are curious in any form about Gnosticism, try visiting [www.gnosis-usa.com](http://www.gnosis-usa.com/) -- they have many interesting articles, and forums as well, if you want to ask more knowledgeable persons about Gnosticism.
And Gnosticism (not to be confused with Christian Gnosticism) is not composed of a bunch of egotists seeking power or praise, fame or glory, any more than Catholicism is. As you all know giving oneself the title “Catholic” or “Gnostic” or “Buddhist” or any affiliation doesn’t mean you represent the* teachings* of that religion.

I’d prefer not to call myself a “Gnostic”—lest I think I do Gnostic practices to perfection, or understand Gnostic teachings fully. And even in labeling myself without a label, that too, is Prideful: to be “different,” “special,” “unique.” So, perhaps, in either case, it’d be best to not worry unless the issue came up: that I am a person, unsure of herself in many ways, but believing the Gnostic teachings of Samael Aun Weor have merit, believing the practices he teaches are worthwhile, and perhaps contain truth; my intuition has lead me here, and only Grace can bring me where I ultimately belong.

As I realize, just like a huge part of me, each of you might be believe yourselves to be right and I very wrong. Maybe thats true. But, if you’ll take my pompous preaching once more, don’t forget that important passage (at least for me, I could always use a daily reminder) from the Christian Gospels: to remove the beam out of your own eye, to see the splinter in your friend’s more clearly (paraphrased). Criticize the beliefs or actions of others, if is appears beneficial. Just the same, work on yourselves.

Thank you for your time.
 
👋

Well Hi there, I wasn’t expecting this! I respond not so much to challenge what you’ve said, but to bump up the thread in hopes other people will see and add their own thoughts, but it just wouldn’t be me if I didn’t say something
The problem with “pinning my beliefs down” is that, truthfully, I know that, ultimately, I don’t know anything for sure.
Really? Do you know that for sure? 😉

I think you belittle yourself. I just came from a Theology of the Body conference this weekend, and even I’m beginning to see problems with the extreme penitential and humbling spirituality I’ve been taking up.

Indeed, we are nothing compared to God. But we **are **something in the sight of God. The reason He died for us is because He loves us, we’re not as insignificant as we make ourselves out to be. Perhaps this is a question that you’ve posed to yourself: “How do we judge our own worth?” One possible answer one might put forth is “How much we are loved.” Using this logic, how much are we worth? We’re **worth God’s own life. **How can we possibly demean our own human worth armed with this kind of knowledge?
And so, I feel that Samael Aun Weor’s teachings, speak to me. Perhaps I’ll never be rid of my egos, perhaps I’m going straight to Hell, but, surely, I want to try to be pure, to be chaste, to be compassionate, to be humble.
No one will ever rid themselves of their “egos” (You may not have, but I use the term in the sense of our own individuality, the part of us that basicly makes us human). Not Jesus, not Buddha, not me, not you. To think the only way to get to Heaven is by doing so is not only (you guessed it) a heresy (aka salvation by works) but also an impossible bar to jump. Jesus said “you will be judged by the measure you measure out.” Usually we take this in the negative context, but it may also indicate a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you think the only way to go Heavenward is to conquer yourself, then you’ll be in for nothing but dissipointments.

The thing to realize is that we can’t maintain humility, chastity, and the other virtues only out of fear of Hell. Eventually, you get sick of trying to subdue all your natural “urges” and lower the bar. No, this will not do. There is a twofold way to obtain control over the more base our of instincts. 1)Submit them to God. This is the one that is easy to guess. The only that says “Hey, we can’t do it ourselves!” The one to which you answered. But the second is the one that I weep when I realize you don’t understand: 2) Submit them to God because He loves you, and you love Him. Catholic moral teaching is more than just “rules that tell us what we can’t do.” It gives us the steps to living and loving as God loves. HE LOVES US. I will keep praying for you that the Holy Spirit will truly dawn this fact in you. We “follow the rules” because we love God, “because of Thy just punishments, but most of all because they offend Thee, my God, whom I should love above all things.” Love of God, and His love for us…that is what makes up Catholicism.
Catholicism contains many wonderful aspects, teachings, rituals, but, finding it better to come to a temporary and perhaps fallible conclusion than no conclusion, I believe it does not contain the entirety of Truth. Perhaps I misunderstand Catholicism.
So, I guess, you are right. You don’t yet understand Catholicsm. But I know you will if you just open your soul to God, I trust Him to take care of you.
I’d prefer not to call myself a “Gnostic”—lest I think I do Gnostic practices to perfection, or understand Gnostic teachings fully. And even in labeling myself without a label, that too, is Prideful: to be “different,” “special,” “unique.” So, perhaps, in either case, it’d be best to not worry unless the issue came up: that I am a person, unsure of herself in many ways, but believing the Gnostic teachings of Samael Aun Weor have merit, believing the practices he teaches are worthwhile, and perhaps contain truth; my intuition has lead me here, and only Grace can bring me where I ultimately belong.
One last thing though. Meditate on this, you are most Gnostic than you give yourself credit for with the simple theology: “Spirit good, body bad.”

The rest I leave up to you, God, and the other members of this wonderful fourm community.

Again, God bless.
 
Palatine, you assume too much from my words-- though I can’t blame you too much for it, as I don’t clarify too often. 🙂 Maybe this can help.

But it is true, that I ultimately know I don’t know. And if it seems I belittled myself too much, I didn’t mean to imply God doesn’t want only the best for me, love me. Though, that is something I often forget to keep in mind. Thank you for the reminder. 🙂
If you think the only way to go Heavenward is to conquer yourself, then you’ll be in for nothing but dissipointments.
If my “selves” are ever conquered, it won’t be my doing: it will be God’s.
The thing to realize is that we can’t maintain humility, chastity, and the other virtues only out of fear of Hell.
I agree. But I also believe the parts of me that wants to be saved for “my” own sake, that selfishly wants to stay alive, to stay away from pain, someday, will either be in Hell, or be dust. Only that which truly is of God, loves, has real compassion, truly deserves Heaven. We have many "I"s within us, which control us day by day. I say this out of experiencing the contractions, internal conversations, conflicting desires, one minute loving something the next minute hating them, and see the truth of that: that so much that “I” thought I was, was not one mind, but many minds. (But again, perhaps I’m wrong, but, I stand by it, nevertheless, it is what I have experienced.)
Eventually, you get sick of trying to subdue all your natural “urges” and lower the bar.
And that is the fate of many, of most, myself too maybe. The goal is not to subdue the urges, but to understand them, and thus act Consciously and not mechanically (not that I’m there, by any means-- perhaps it is utterly impossible, but… I believe… perhaps it isn’t), without letting those things control our every move. Watching yourself… theres much more to this all, but I am only a beginner, and learning more about my desires, my egos, and how they function in my emotions, in my mind, in my instincts and actions is where I am.

I never said I believed the body to be “bad,” that Christian Gnostic stereotype. Those stereotypes, that Gnosticism thinks the “body bad, the spirit good” are just as applicable as thinking that Catholics are polytheists, via the Saints or even the Trinity. Its taking one aspect or heresey out of the context of the whole… as I’m sure you’ve suffered many times by you’ve argued with (myself included ;D). You and I both need to fully appreciate each others position-- I’m sure I don’t understand Catholecism as best I can, and I’m also sure you don’t understand my “beliefs” or “Gnosticism.”

Sure,** maybe its not true**, maybe its wrong, wrong, wrong… but is it wrong wrong wrong for the reasons you assume? I understand we’re all limited, we’re not perfect, we’re mortal and flawed-- but… please give others a chance before assuming their wrong for reasons they don’t even hold true in the first place.

I imagine red flags might be going up in your brain upon hearing the words “pranayama,” “transmutation,” “meditation,” “chakra,” or “astral projection.” Is that because of a thorough or decent understanding of these things, or mere heresey, memories of these things being dubbed “Satanic” by someone else? (And I don’t deny, they could be. And I don’t say that out of my cautionary “doubt”-- I believe many, if not most, people who use occult termenology, or do occult practices, aren’t doing so properly, positively, are only doing so to strenthen “themselves” their desires, their “inner demons.”)

Egos aren’t what make us human, from my understanding. They’re what make us UN-human, evil and terrible. One “I” wants to be a good person to get praise, another “I” believes that they are a good person and need no verification… if you’d like to, try watching your own thoughts throughout the day, especially interacting with people-- just see what comes up. Maybe you’ll notice these “little demons” who say “sleep all morning!” “yell at mom!” “post a reply to defend myself and make myself appear smart and great!” And we are not those "I"s, those desires, those egos which we so often identify ourselves with. We are potential souls, (like “buddhatas,” or “potential buddhas”) and have a Father who love us always, and a Mother, too, who want only the best for us (whether that be suffering to make us grow, or a delight to appreciate). Much like God the Father, and Mary, in Catholicism. I’d say, that is exactly true, the same, even if our words aren’ t identical, I imagine the Truth is (and no, I haven’t experienced this for myself entirely, without a doubt in mind, but only have my faith.) and that is where these similarities come from between so many religions: a similar, singular Truth. This is what I “believe,” and I know it needs further explanation and clarification, which I’m willing to elaborate on.

Thanks for your time and your prayers, Palatine. 🙂
 
WheatBean, it is good to see that you are willing to dialogue about your beliefs, and believe me when I say that I understand your quest for self-understanding. My own journey of spirituality began as a cradle-Catholic, and then I was influenced (of my own choosing) by Christian Gnostic mysticism. From there, I left the Church, and proceeded to search out the “Greater Truth” on my own. Eventually, my search for this elusive “Greater Truth” lead me right back to where I started: the Universal Church.

You’ve put forth some interesting statements, and in a few following posts, I would like to share some comments on those statements, in the hope that they will provide you with some food for thought.

As a final note, I know that none of us here on this forum, or anywhere else for that matter, can change you. Only you can choose how and when you change. All we can do is provide what we help and insight we think we have in helping with those choices.

God Bless,
Ford
 
40.png
WheatBean:
But also, I’m realizing that I simply must believe in something, follow something. Even if my view is cloudy, even if I can be wrong, or that I could follow a doctrine and do practices that are entirely a worthless waste of my time… it is best to try, rather than to float through life with a few flimsy ideas about God or existence or purpose.
If you are searching for something to believe in, anything, then why did you choose your current belief system? I do not say this in ridicule or judgement, simply out of curiosity. If anything will do, why not Catholicism?

In fact, I believe it is precisely what you’re looking for. You say that you cannot know the truth (or at least, that is heavily what you imply). But if God Himself has revealed the truth, I’m fairly (actually completely) sure we can take him at his word. After all, He’s the Almighty. Whatever he says is the truth, by the simple fact of his Omnipotence.

If you’re looking for something to believe in, that something ultimately should be Jesus. He alone has made promises no other religious figure could make. And He’s made good on those promises. If you’re going to believe in something, why go about with hazy ideas. Why not say (and I mean it, try saying this out load): “Jesus Christ is the Way, the Truth, and the Life.” He loves you. Even now, as you read this. He loves you, precisely as you are. And the only thing He asks, is that you love Him back. And that is easier than you might think.

More to come 😉

God Bless,
Ford
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top