God Believes In Term Limits

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve40
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Steve40

Guest
I don’t want to dance on someone’s grave before they are dead, but in this case I have no sadness in God’s original sin judgment upon an individual who has a legacy of supporting the butchery of millions of children. May God have mercy upon his soul.
 
I don’t want to dance on someone’s grave before they are dead, but in this case I have no sadness in God’s original sin judgment upon an individual who has a legacy of supporting the butchery of millions of children. May God have mercy upon his soul.
Better yet… may that “individual” realize his error and beg forgiveness from God before the end comes. :crossrc:
 
Im guessing you are talking about an… :irish3: I agree that he not the best, and is in the running for first place in worse and should not be considered for sainthood, regardless of what a certian state thinks, but I would never wish or rejoice that fate on anyone, no matter how bad they are, I think if you do you are a worse than him, because he might not even recognize that they are a live, while you who know and respect the sacredness of life and yet you still will a painful death.
 
Better yet… may that “individual” realize his error and beg forgiveness from God before the end comes. :crossrc:
I agree. From my view in this People’s Republic, I have never agreed with or personally liked :irish3: , but agree that he needs our prayers for his conversion and for the comfort of his family.
 
I don’t want to dance on someone’s grave before they are dead, but in this case I have no sadness in God’s original sin judgment upon an individual who has a legacy of supporting the butchery of millions of children. May God have mercy upon his soul.
May God have mercy upon all of our souls.

By the way, what judgment is God rendering on this person? Or this one? Or this one?

Is that really how you think God works?
 
Let us ask Saint Joseph to send Senator Kennedy a merciful death, and also pray for the repose of his soul.
 
It’s funny how what God believes coincides with the interests of the person who makes that claim.
 
Kennedy was yet another Christian politician who switched from pro-life to pro-abortion because he thought it would help his presidential aspirations.
 
May God have mercy upon all of our souls.

By the way, what judgment is God rendering on this person? Or this one? Or this one?

Is that really how you think God works?
Original sin gave us all the death penalty. Who am I to question God’s decision on that. The wages of sin is death and we all deserve it. In fact I would say we all deserve Hell too but God Is Merciful. I truly hope that even our leaders who agree with killing kids will cry out to Him for mercy. Death is nothing compared to eternity in Hell.
 
It’s funny how what God believes coincides with the interests of the person who makes that claim.
God’s term limits do not discriminate between the righteous and the unrighteous. My dad died at the age of 38 when I was 5 years old and from what I hear he was a righteous man. I barely knew him, but today I know why he died.
 
I don’t want to dance on someone’s grave before they are dead,
Yes, you do. Or you wouldn’t have posted this.
…but in this case I have no sadness in God’s original sin judgment upon an individual who has a legacy of supporting the butchery of millions of children.
That’s funny… I certainly don’t ever remember the good senator advocating the butchery of children. He supported the abortion on foetuses, if that’s what you were trying to say.
May God have mercy upon his soul.
And on yours and mine as well.
 
What would be great is to publicly renounce his part in this and repent. What a legacy that would be.
 
That’s funny… I certainly don’t ever remember the good senator advocating the butchery of children. He supported the abortion on foetuses, if that’s what you were trying to say.
Abortion in any form is the butery of children.
 
Abortion in any form is the butery of children.
No, it isn’t. Abortion is the deliberate termination of a pregnancy. Calling it things like the “butchery of children” and the “slaughter of babies” is just a poor tactic used by the pro-life crowd to try and play to people’s strong emotions. It is an inferior way to argue a claim and weakens the argument before any relevant points are made. But we are getting away from the topic at hand.
 
Yes, you do. Or you wouldn’t have posted this…
I think you are right and it is a lack of character on my part. That however does not take away from value in speaking the truth about a legacy of child killing endorsement.
That’s funny… I certainly don’t ever remember the good senator advocating the butchery of children. He supported the abortion on foetuses, if that’s what you were trying to say.
.
Then you are blind as a bat, but you made it out of the womb what do you care if 40 million others don’t? Do you think God cares less for children in the womb than those of us who made it out?
And on yours and mine as well.
Amen, for all I know I may be more culpable for my sins of thought word, deed and omission than the baby butcher supporter.
 
No, it isn’t. Abortion is the deliberate termination of a pregnancy. Calling it things like the “butchery of children” and the “slaughter of babies” is just a poor tactic used by the pro-life crowd to try and play to people’s strong emotions. It is an inferior way to argue a claim and weakens the argument before any relevant points are made. But we are getting away from the topic at hand.
If a mother drowns her child in the bathtub, it is called butchery. Why should it be any different for a baby in the womb? Why is the child in the womb any different?
 
No, it isn’t. Abortion is the deliberate termination of a pregnancy. Calling it things like the “butchery of children” and the “slaughter of babies” is just a poor tactic used by the pro-life crowd to try and play to people’s strong emotions. It is an inferior way to argue a claim and weakens the argument before any relevant points are made. But we are getting away from the topic at hand.
How would you like it if someone deliberately terminated your intake of air? It wouldn’t be killing you, it would just be terminating your air supply.

To hell with tacktics and trying to reach preople like you who have their head so far up their rear end that they don’t even know where they came from.
 
If a mother drowns her child in the bathtub, it is called butchery. Why should it be any different for a baby in the womb? Why is the child in the womb any different?
Actually, if the mother drowns her child in the bathtub, it’s called drowning.
How would you like it if someone deliberately terminated your intake of air? It wouldn’t be killing you, it would just be terminating your air supply.
Killing by termination of air supply, suffocation, whatever you want to call it. Except butchery. That, it isn’t.
To hell with tacktics and trying to reach preople like you who have their head so far up their rear end that they don’t even know where they came from.
Okay, so you’re the one who cannot see the problem with using inaccurate terminology and I’m the one with my head up my arse?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top