GOD does not have moral free will like human beings

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChainBreaker
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

ChainBreaker

Guest
  1. God is pure actuality.
  2. Love is identical to Gods nature, which is his existence, which is his intellect, which is his will, which is his law.
  3. It is metaphysically impossible for God to do that which is not identical to his nature as that would contradict the fact that he is pure actuality and therefore would imply potency in his nature.
Conclusion: God has no choice but to be Love for it is his nature to be so and it is his existence.
 
  1. God is pure actuality.
  2. Love is identical to Gods nature, which is his existence, which is his intellect, which is his will, which is his law.
  3. It is metaphysically impossible for God to do that which is not identical to his nature as that would contradict the fact that he is pure actuality and therefore would imply potency in his nature.
Conclusion: God has no choice but to be Love for it is his nature to be so and it is his existence.
The idea of creation was inside his mind, hence he couldn’t have free will for his only act!
 
  1. God is pure actuality.
  2. Love is identical to Gods nature, which is his existence, which is his intellect, which is his will, which is his law.
  3. It is metaphysically impossible for God to do that which is not identical to his nature as that would contradict the fact that he is pure actuality and therefore would imply potency in his nature.
Conclusion: God has no choice but to be Love for it is his nature to be so and it is his existence.
This is exactly the problem I have with the idea of God having free will. It is defended by saying that God cannot choose evil, but can choose from a number of possible worlds to create, or to not create at all.

Of course, I think that for God to not create would be evil, since evil is an absence, and good is a presence. Therefore choosing to not create the world seems like an impossibility according to the nature of God.

And then there is the trouble of infinite and perfect good creating an imperfectly good world.
 
This is exactly the problem I have with the idea of God having free will. It is defended by saying that God cannot choose evil, but can choose from a number of possible worlds to create, or to not create at all.

Of course, I think that for God to not create would be evil, since evil is an absence, and good is a presence. Therefore choosing to not create the world seems like an impossibility according to the nature of God.

And then there is the trouble of infinite and perfect good creating an imperfectly good world.
Love is necessarily creative. I see no other way of looking at it since all that which is analogous to the good are potencies waiting to be actualized and it would not be identical to the nature of love to not at least allow the possibility of their actualization. Perhaps we are seeing this played out in quantum events.

It really depends on context. In one context God does not have to create the universe in the sense that universe does not necessarily exist and therefore cannot cause God to create. In another context, at least in the context of God being love, it is God’s nature to share existence for that is what love does and cannot be conceived as a choice in the human sense of the word.

As far as your last sentence is concerned, I find it hard to conceive of God creating a world that does not “evolve-naturally” (which will probably result in the manifestation of imperfections as we see it) since no part of the universe including humanity has a particular right to exist over other potential things precisely because everything that is not God is contingent upon God to exist, and love favors no one. Love is not prejudiced. I don’t think there is a hierarchy of rights to exists; thus even the most imperfect thing like a virus has a potential to be real. The only rights we have over the virus is our capacity to have a relationship with God.

Our potency is to be shepherds over creation, but we don’t have a natural right to exist over the existence of other forms of creation. This is to say that our existence doesn’t mean that other forms of existence dangerous or otherwise are not allowed to become actual. However perhaps the potency of the universe is as such that somethings are likely to become actual more than others. This is to say that physical law keeps a balance in terms of what is possible and acts as a kind of safe guard over total chaos.
 
That is your God, whether you like it or not!

And, yes, he could only have one act otherwise he is not perfect and he has to do it otherwise he is not love.
I am not arguing against that. Go to spec-savers.
 
The idea of creation was inside his mind, hence he couldn’t have free will for his only act!
He could have not created the universe if he didn’t want to. Nothing obligated him to create anything
 
This is a false dilemma. Perfect love is necessarily perfectly free. Anything less than perfect love is by nature less than perfectly free.

I suggest reading Jim Blackburn’s article The Truth Will Make You Free.

-Greg
 
This is a false dilemma. Perfect love is necessarily perfectly free. Anything less than perfect love is by nature less than perfectly free.

I suggest reading Jim Blackburn’s article The Truth Will Make You Free.

-Greg
It’s not a false dilemma. You are correct that God is perfectly free. But he does not have moral free will like human beings. Please read the title of the thread.

But thanks for the link.
 
Are there any scholars in the last few thousand years that have had similar ideas or is this concept original with you?

I just don’t see how Thomas Aquinas, Augustine of Hippo and a thousand other Christian theologians missed this valuable line of reasoning for hundreds upon hundreds of years… :hmmm:
 
I think God DOES have moral free will: He could choose to do evil, but He doesn’t choose to do it. He is not bound by our opinions on the matter. He cannot be forced or coerced into anything, so I’m thinking He has complete free will.

Conversely, satan is PURE EVIL, right? Do you think he has free will, in light of the fact that he can do NO GOOD?
 
I think God DOES have moral free will: He could choose to do evil, but He doesn’t choose to do it. He is not bound by our opinions on the matter. He cannot be forced or coerced into anything, so I’m thinking He has complete free will.

Conversely, satan is PURE EVIL, right? Do you think he has free will, in light of the fact that he can do NO GOOD?
He could have chosen to be good and now he is choosing to be bad for all eternity
 
Are there any scholars in the last few thousand years that have had similar ideas or is this concept original with you?

I just don’t see how Thomas Aquinas, Augustine of Hippo and a thousand other Christian theologians missed this valuable line of reasoning for hundreds upon hundreds of years… :hmmm:
HAS it been determined by the Church or by any of the thinkers you mention?
 
I think God DOES have moral free will: He could choose to do evil, but He doesn’t choose to do it. He is not bound by our opinions on the matter. He cannot be forced or coerced into anything, so I’m thinking He has complete free will.

Conversely, satan is PURE EVIL, right? Do you think he has free will, in light of the fact that he can do NO GOOD?
Metaphysical fact states otherwise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top