GOD does not have moral free will like human beings

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChainBreaker
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Could you list those facts for those of us not as smart as you are?:o
  1. God is pure actuality.
  2. Love is identical to Gods nature, which is his existence, which is his intellect, which is his will, which is his law.
  3. It is metaphysically impossible for God to do that which is not identical to his nature as that would contradict the fact that he is pure actuality and therefore would imply that there is potency in his act.
Conclusion: God has no choice but to be Love for it is his nature to be so and it is his existence… God does not choose to love. Love is what God is essentially.
 
Please show me how you, as an assumed free person, can create something out of nothing.
Never said creation from nothing was required.

However, freely choosing to create a variety of goods from materials and talents provided by God is quite in line with what it means to have free will on a human level. We can create novel “form” from the materials and potential which exist around us using our internal capacities that can be developed by practice, training and learning.
 
The capacity to choose evil does not ADD anything to God’s power, ergo it cannot be a positive quality to choose evil.

You seemed to imply that the lacking the capacity to choose evil would be a limiter on God’s free will. I am saying it would not be because choosing evil would be a negative attribution and take away or lessen God’s power because evil is always a privation or deprivation of some positive capacity or other. That is simply what evil is.

Choosing evil always detracts or takes away from being, so in the case of God, choosing evil would necessarily make God less than omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent.

Even in human beings, free will is the capacity to choose from an array of goods provided they are all licit goods. By choosing evil, the capacity to choose is marshalled against itself to undermine the very capacity to choose itself – that is what evil is and why it is harmful. It blinds and disables the virtues or powers of the soul.

Why would God choose to act against the power of his own will - again what evil is?
When i speak of moral freewill, i am talking about our ability to choose between good and evil. I am saying that God does not have moral freewill.
 
I never argued that it did add anything to God’s power.:confused:
Good, then we are probably not disagreeing on a whole lot.

I just think it is confusing to claim God doesn’t or cannot “choose” to love, though it does make sense to say his “choosing” is not the same kind of choosing (following deliberation) that might characterize our choosing.
 
Good, then we are probably not disagreeing on a whole lot.

I just think it is confusing to claim God doesn’t or cannot “choose” to love, though it does make sense to say his “choosing” is not the same kind of choosing (following deliberation) that might characterize our choosing.
Thats why in the title of the thread it says GOD does not have moral free will like human beings

God is love. Therefore it makes no sense to speak of God as choosing between good and evil.
 
When i speak of moral freewill, i am talking about our ability to choose between good and evil. I am saying that God does not have moral freewill.
Choosing between good and evil is not an “ability,” more like a dysfunction. We have a capacity to choose freely. The fact that we can short circuit that ability and lessen it by doing evil is not what makes free will moral. It is what makes our wills immoral when we do so.
 
Choosing between good and evil is not an “ability,” more like a dysfunction. We have a capacity to choose freely. The fact that we can short circuit that ability and lessen it by doing evil is not what makes free will moral. It is what makes our wills immoral when we do so.
I never said that our capacity to choose evil is moral. We are able to choose between good and evil. What does it mean to short circuit? We either have the capacity to choose between good and evil, or we do not.
 
If God’s nature is love then he is only act! Are you guys sure what you are talking about? :bounce:
 
I never said that our capacity to choose evil is moral. We are able to choose between good and evil. What does it mean to short circuit? We either have the capacity to choose between good and evil, or we do not.
We have the capacity but USING IT necessarily erodes, removes or destroys the capacity itself.

I have a hand. Having the hand affords me the potential to do many things. I have the capacity with my other hand to cut my hand off, but doing so reduces my overall capacity, it does not improve it.

The “capacity” to do evil is NOT a capacity, strictly speaking, it creates incapacity.
 
We have the capacity but USING IT necessarily erodes, removes or destroys the capacity itself.

I have a hand. Having the hand affords me the potential to do many things. I have the capacity with my other hand to cut my hand off, but doing so reduces my overall capacity, it does not improve it.

The “capacity” to do evil is NOT a capacity, strictly speaking, it creates incapacity.
I think its clear what i am talking about. I am not going to argue of usage of words.
 
Define freedom.
God’s freedom lies in his will to do all that is good. He is not compelled to do that good, he does it freely. He is not like man who mulls over a choice to do evil or good. But even in man freedom is primarily in his will to do good.

Linus2nd
 
God’s freedom lies in his will to do all that is good. He is not compelled to do that good, he does it freely. He is not like man who mulls over a choice to do evil or good. But even in man freedom is primarily in his will to do good.
Linus2nd
Is there any tension between God’s love and freedom? If so he is not perfect!
 
God’s freedom lies in his will to do all that is good. He is not compelled to do that good, he does it freely. He is not like man who mulls over a choice to do evil or good. But even in man freedom is primarily in his will to do good.

Linus2nd
If you can only will one thing due to your nature, you have to will it. There is no choice. Saying that it is “free” because it is ordered towards the good means nothing then.

I don’t know if I will ever get what you mean by “freedom”.
 
I think its clear what i am talking about. I am not going to argue of usage of words.
It may be clear to you what you are talking about, but unless the “usage of words” is in common there will be a failure to achieve clarity among all.
 
Is there any tension between God’s love and freedom? If so he is not perfect!
There is no tension or confusion in God. And God’s love and freedom are characteristics of his very Essence, which is Pure Act of Existence. And Pure Existence is the summation of all that Is and all that is possible - with nothing left over. And since evil is the absence of what should be, evil does not exist in God. And since there is no evil in God, he is perfectly free to do what is good out of love for himself, to show his glory, his magnificence, his perfection.

Linus2nd.
 
There is no tension or confusion in God. And God’s love and freedom are characteristics of his very Essence, which is Pure Act of Existence. And Pure Existence is the summation of all that Is and all that is possible - with nothing left over. And since evil is the absence of what should be, evil does not exist in God. And since there is no evil in God, he is perfectly free to do what is good out of love for himself, to show his glory, his magnificence, his perfection.

Linus2nd.
You mean that God only loves himself but creation. How there could be no tension in God if he loves creation but he doesn’t create because he is free?
 
There is no tension or confusion in God. And God’s love and freedom are characteristics of his very Essence, which is Pure Act of Existence. And Pure Existence is the summation of all that Is and all that is possible - with nothing left over. And since evil is the absence of what should be, evil does not exist in God. And since there is no evil in God, he is perfectly free to do what is good out of love for himself, to show his glory, his magnificence, his perfection.

Linus2nd.
Freedom cannot exist without the capability of acting otherwise. Even if God can choose from different ways of creating, he is not free to act otherwise.

If there is no possibility to act otherwise, then the act is necessary. It may be free in the sense of ordered towards the good, but it is not autonomous.
 
If you can only will one thing due to your nature, you have to will it. There is no choice. Saying that it is “free” because it is ordered towards the good means nothing then.

I don’t know if I will ever get what you mean by “freedom”.
Look at it this way, evil is the absence of something good ( Thomas Aquinas and the Catholic Church ). Men constantly struggle because of concupiscence to do the good that they should do. The evil that they so often do, is a distortion of the good or even a complete destruction of it. It is the absence of what should be done, of what should be there. And the more men do this, the more enslaved they become and the less free they are to do the good that they should do. The Saints are the most free men among us, because they have trained themselves to do the good.

But only God is absolutely free to do good, because in him there is no evil. And part ( if we may speak so as an analogy ) of his goodness is the freedom of will he exercises by creating what is good. He is not compelled to do it, he freely does it. ( again this is the teaching of Thomas Aquinas and the Church also).

Linus2nd
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top