Just in case curiosity gets the better of you here’s a link
thunderbolts.info/home.htm
As for metaphysics do you concentrate on cosmology or on ontology … or both ? It would be interesting to read some of your findings
I read that site and looked up a little more to see how far they seem to be getting with their efforts.
In my writings (a slowly forming book), I emphasis very precise logic and the very deep "why"s for just about everything in physics and a lot of the mind and society. I begin, much as in Genesis, with the concept of absolute nothingness and concentrate on why it is that anything exists at all, the make of the universe and even God (that one will break your brain if anything will). I try to make no presumptions without later proving that the presumption was a necessary rational assumption, although leave nothing unquestioned and thus remove the age-old concern of having to have axioms. I even get into why logic is logic, “metalogic”. I deal with concerns well above the Abramic religions. Thomas Aquinas meant well, but was a novice.
The biggest issue is merely language. To discuss such extreme depths of reality, one must be very careful to define the precise intention of the words being used and their concepts. But in doing so, discussing anything with a common crowd becomes nearly impossible as most words carry skewed, distorted, diverse, and connotative misunderstandings.
I get into what the universe is actually made of, why it is a continuum without discontinuity, why we have 3 spacial dimensions (and cannot have a fourth), why there is positive and negative, what causes distance and size, why motion exists, why quantization occurs, why photons and particles behave the way they do, and of what they are made, what magnetism actually is, what causes mass attraction, and so on.
Then I step into the mind, of what it is made and how it works (what intelligence actually is made of), and why (I’m big on the "why"s
). Then into what and why life is, what a soul and spirit is, social interaction, organizations, social organisms, strategies of harmony, destruction, and reconstruction, and basically why humans and animals do all they do.
Then I touch on government methods and types, the "why"s and predictable results of each general type and finally, by logical necessity, exactly what type of governance must and WILL govern life as it cannot be avoided regardless of what else is going on or being attempted.
I’m considering a little on the whole “salvation” concern, what it means, how it works, the "why"s, but that might be redundant.
So if you are planning on reading it, I hope you are young enough to still be around when it is in readable form (I very seriously need a talented tech writer…sigh).
