God passing over people

  • Thread starter Thread starter thinkandmull
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The quoted portion is in contradiction to the Christian God being in a timeless state. To do the thing listed that God Must interact with time on a continual basis. This is evident by the simple fact that humanity has existed in time since their beginning. Therefore. to sustain existence, etc, That God must be in constant interaction.
To me, that is simple logic, and the eternal now teaching is…illogical.

John
It is not a contradiction. The logic is that time and eternity are different. Aquinas wrote (S.T. Q10):

… time always goes on, yet it is possible to note in time both the beginning and the end, by considering its parts: thus we speak of the beginning and the end of a day or of a year; which cannot be applied to eternity. Still these differences follow upon the essential and primary differences, that eternity is simultaneously whole, but that time is not so.
 
It is not a contradiction. The logic is that time and eternity are different. Aquinas wrote (S.T. Q10):

… time always goes on, yet it is possible to note in time both the beginning and the end, by considering its parts: thus we speak of the beginning and the end of a day or of a year; which cannot be applied to eternity. Still these differences follow upon the essential and primary differences, that eternity is simultaneously whole, but that time is not so.
Aquinas, as in many things of the scientific nature, was incorrect. It is not possible to be outside of time, yet constantly interact with the same. Even deities cannot defy logical consistency.

John
 
Aquinas, as in many things of the scientific nature, was incorrect. It is not possible to be outside of time, yet constantly interact with the same. Even deities cannot defy logical consistency.

John
God does not have real relations with the World (God is simple and lacks all accidents), per Aquinas. The relation of God to creatures are merely conceptual. (S.T. Q13, 7: “I answer that, The names which import relation to creatures are applied to God temporally, and not from eternity.”)

All genuine relationships do not involve mutual dependence. To say it is so, is anthropomorphism. There is a real relationship between creatures and the Creator, as shown by Aquinas.
 
God only sustains good things in existence. It is contrary to His goodness to sustain the body of the rapist and its victim together during the evil act. The only conclusion is that the Devil has the power to sustain matter when sins are being committed.
 
God does not have real relations with the World (God is simple and lacks all accidents), per Aquinas. The relation of God to creatures are merely conceptual. (S.T. Q13, 7: “I answer that, The names which import relation to creatures are applied to God temporally, and not from eternity.”)

All genuine relationships do not involve mutual dependence. To say it is so, is anthropomorphism. There is a real relationship between creatures and the Creator, as shown by Aquinas.
I’ll simply refer you back to your own quotes:
God upholds and sustains creation.
301 With creation, God does not abandon his creatures to themselves. He not only gives them being and existence, but also, and at every moment, upholds and sustains them in being, enables them to act and brings them to their final end. Recognizing this utter dependence with respect to the Creator is a source of wisdom and freedom, of joy and confidence:
For you love all things that exist, and detest none of the things that you have made; for you would not have made anything if you had hated it. How would anything have endured, if you had not willed it? Or how would anything not called forth by you have been preserved? You spare all things, for they are yours, O Lord, you who love the living.160160 Wis 11:24-26.
By the way, temporarily and moment are both descriptions of time.

John
 
I’ll simply refer you back to your own quotes:

By the way, temporarily and moment are both descriptions of time.

John
Because God is one with His attributes, deciding to send His Son, deciding to create, and responses to good or evil on earth (“He rejoices in good”) are, in using our way of thinking, nothing to His necessary existence.
 
God only sustains good things in existence. It is contrary to His goodness to sustain the body of the rapist and its victim together during the evil act. The only conclusion is that the Devil has the power to sustain matter when sins are being committed.
Or perhaps, neither sustains anything. Just maybe we are on our own in this world. That’s my belief…naturally, take it for what it’s worth.

John
 
Because God is one with His attributes, deciding to send His Son, deciding to create, and responses to good or evil on earth (“He rejoices in good”) are, in using our way of thinking, nothing to His necessary existence.
I agree that we contribute nothing to the attributes or existence of God. However, if a deity intervenes in any way in this earthly existence, that deity is crossing the plane between eternity and time.

John
 
I’ll simply refer you back to your own quotes:

By the way, temporarily and moment are both descriptions of time.

John
God is eternal which is not temporal. He has no real relation (does not sustain any real relation) with the world (rather there is a relation of reason – God is of a different order), however mankind is related to God as His effects. God is unchanged by His acting upon the world.

Read Brian Shanley (Thomist, 59):

Aquinas clearly thinks that God is “related” to the world in the sense that he creates, loves, knows, wills, governs, and redeems the world. The denial that God is “really related” to the world does not undermine any of those claims. It simply denies that God’s causal activity, and any relational terms thereby ascribed to him, implies any alteration in his being. When God acts so as to bring creatures into relationship with him, all of the “happening” is located in creation rather than in God.
 
. . . Brian Shanley (Thomist, 59):

. . . When God acts so as to bring creatures into relationship with him, all of the “happening” is located in creation rather than in God.
Makes sense. Thanks.
 
God is eternal which is not temporal. He has no real relation (does not sustain any real relation) with the world (rather there is a relation of reason – God is of a different order), however mankind is related to God as His effects. God is unchanged by His acting upon the world.

Read Brian Shanley (Thomist, 59):

Aquinas clearly thinks that God is “related” to the world in the sense that he creates, loves, knows, wills, governs, and redeems the world. The denial that God is “really related” to the world does not undermine any of those claims. It simply denies that God’s causal activity, and any relational terms thereby ascribed to him, implies any alteration in his being. When God acts so as to bring creatures into relationship with him, all of the “happening” is located in creation rather than in God.
However, it needs to be said that we are speaking of God’s very decision to become Incarnate; that the idea of His choice in this matter did not put a new idea in the mind of God, because that would alter His nature which is one with its mind. Contingent vs necessary is the same as nothing to something, to our way of thinking
 
However, it needs to be said that we are speaking of God’s very decision to become Incarnate; that the idea of His choice in this matter did not put a new idea in the mind of God, because that would alter His nature which is one with its mind. Contingent vs necessary is the same as nothing to something, to our way of thinking
The person of the Son is eternal and changeless so incarnation is eternally predestined.
 
God is eternal which is not temporal. He has no real relation (does not sustain any real relation) with the world (rather there is a relation of reason – God is of a different order), however mankind is related to God as His effects. God is unchanged by His acting upon the world.

Read Brian Shanley (Thomist, 59):

Aquinas clearly thinks that God is “related” to the world in the sense that he creates, loves, knows, wills, governs, and redeems the world. The denial that God is “really related” to the world does not undermine any of those claims. It simply denies that God’s causal activity, and any relational terms thereby ascribed to him, implies any alteration in his being. When God acts so as to bring creatures into relationship with him, all of the “happening” is located in creation rather than in God.
Truly think about the bolded, and what Aquinas had to say. Is it even remotely logical? If a simple human like myself can see the holes in the concept…welll…you know where I am heading.

John
 
Truly think about the bolded, and what Aquinas had to say. Is it even remotely logical? If a simple human like myself can see the holes in the concept…welll…you know where I am heading.

John
Yes, what St. Thomas has presented is logical. Some may think that St. Thomas Aquinas would not apply the B-Theory (tenseless) of time or similar, but this does not form a proof. The Classic Theology is the God is eternal not in time.
 
The person of the Son is eternal and changeless so incarnation is eternally predestined.
You are still not getting what I am saying. God’s decision to become incarnate and also to create are not necessary or part of His nature. But His decision creates a new idea in His mind, the contingent Idea that He had decided to create and also die on the Cross. If God’s intellect is His Himself, then His nature would change from contingent new knowledge of His decisions about us. If you don’t understand this point I am making, you won’t understand my explanation of its difficultty given earlier
 
You are still not getting what I am saying. God’s decision to become incarnate and also to create are not necessary or part of His nature. But His decision creates a new idea in His mind, the contingent Idea that He had decided to create and also die on the Cross. If God’s intellect is His Himself, then His nature would change from contingent new knowledge of His decisions about us. If you don’t understand this point I am making, you won’t understand my explanation of its difficultty given earlier
It is not a matter of not understanding it, but one of agreement. God predestined the work of Incarnation to be the remedy of human sin. There is no real decision to incarnate made in time because God is simple and eternal such that relation and essence are not different.
 
Its still a contingent decision resulting in contingent knowledge in God’s mind from eternity. If God and His mind and His ideas are one, than God’s nature changed because of contingent things. My way of avoiding it is to say contingent is related to necessary as nothing to something. You are side-stepping my point
 
Yes, what St. Thomas has presented is logical. Some may think that St. Thomas Aquinas would not apply the B-Theory (tenseless) of time or similar, but this does not form a proof. The Classic Theology is the God is eternal not in time.
Yet the teachings clearly indicate a belief that God interacts with time. If that is not the case, then the whole script was pre-written and we are merely actors on a stage…“full of sound and fury…signifying nothing.” No need for prayer, no need for hope…God is in his eternal now and nothing can change his creation.

John
 
Yet the teachings clearly indicate a belief that God interacts with time. If that is not the case, then the whole script was pre-written and we are merely actors on a stage…“full of sound and fury…signifying nothing.” No need for prayer, no need for hope…God is in his eternal now and nothing can change his creation.

John
God acts within creation, but remains perfect, simple, eternal.
We are actors on a stage, constructed by God, who has also chosen the happy ending.
As actors, we create our own personal script albeit that the role we play is determined.
The significance lies in the power, the love and the glory that is God’s.
Hope and prayer connects us with transcendent reality.
All this is God’s will, and it is ultimately all good.
 
Yet the teachings clearly indicate a belief that God interacts with time. If that is not the case, then the whole script was pre-written and we are merely actors on a stage…“full of sound and fury…signifying nothing.” No need for prayer, no need for hope…God is in his eternal now and nothing can change his creation.

John
We are not merely actors" the dogma merely is that God have given man free will although predestined.

Although God is of another eternal order, mankind does have a relationship with God. Man being creatures in time do not comprehend the eternal predestination.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top