GOP candidate poses with rifle, says she’s targeting ‘socialist’ congresswomen

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nepperhan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You’re in favor of taking up arms against fellow citizens because you don’t agree with their beliefs. Hmm…
 
meltzerboy2 said:
Seems to me it is Trump who is mainly Anti-American, especially with regard to the military, if his recent statements are accurate. But this is not at all surprising to those of us who have followed his New York City career for a long time, as well as his presidency.
Click to expand...
There have been many people, most who were with the President at that time, who have denounced the claims in the article. Even John Boltan, who has no love for the President, states it is not true. I know none of that is going to be shown on MSM but it is fact.
 
FrankFletcher said:
Saying she’s fighting for this country with a firearm is definitely something different.
Click to expand...
FrankFletcher said:
With guns?? Against fellow citizens?? Against elected officials?? 😳
Click to expand...
These are assumptions you are making, that the left is making. One of the bigger threats we face from the left is the attempt to remove our 2A rights. This could be her way of saying “come and take my guns”. You are way over reacting.
 
FrankFletcher said:
You’re in favor of taking up arms against fellow citizens because you don’t agree with their beliefs. Hmm…
Click to expand...
Have you seen what is going on in some of our major cities in this country over the last few months?
 
It should be shown on MSM so that the people can decide. It is interesting that FOX news has NOT denounced the claim of the reporter but supported it. It also fits with what Trump has previously stated regarding the service of McCain and Bush, Sr. Still, all information on this issue should be reported and evaluated (in an ideal world).
 
Last edited:
You are comparing social unrest and violence in three or four cities to the Red Army?

And what about the White Nationalist (Supremacist) terrorists? Do you have as much antipathy toward them as you do the leftist terrorists? I despise both. What about you?

Do you think that violence on both sides will resolve the conflict? I do not.
 
Correct me if I’m wrong, but this lady isn’t elected yet, right?

The House has “censure” mechanisms, but they’re for members. If she’s not elected, she’s not a member.

What exactly are you looking for someone (who?) to do with this woman?

If she has committed a crime then she should be reported to law enforcement.
 
Last edited:
NO ONE should be allowed to burn cities, loot stores, or commit violence. Anyone who does so is a criminal, and must be stopped, but by law enforcement, not vigilantes, who will only inflame and perpetuate the violence. Violence begets more violence.
 
Fair point but is crossing state lines to do this not a crime?
 
Would your dad have exposed your life for property?
I know mine wouldn’t have.
Over and over we repeat to our teens: nothing is worth your life. Hand in everything . Don t resist . Then we’ll go denounce.
Two worlds it seems…
 
Last edited:
Yes, out of love , even unthinkingly for a dad or mom or a loved one,that I can understand.
But we are supposed to be the adults…
 
Last edited:
I saw Fox News denounce just this evening. I agree, ALL information on this issue should be reported and evaluated. Too bad we haven’t had that luxury in the last four years.
 
meltzerboy2 said:
So you support vigilanteism?
Click to expand...
As much as the left supports violent mobs taking over cities and burning them, looting stores as “reparations”, beating people, attacking people, killing children in the crossfire and not caring because those particular black lives don’t matter at all. I support as much as Kamala Harris said in June, it’s not going to stop until they get what they want and she was proud of that, she was proud of them.
meltzerboy2 said:
You are comparing social unrest and violence in three or four cities to the Red Army?

And what about the White Nationalist (Supremacist) terrorists? Do you have as much antipathy toward them as you do the leftist terrorists? I despise both. What about you?
Click to expand...
Antifa and BLM has terrorized parts of this country since the end of May.
It’s easy to call everyone on the right White Nationalists (Supremacist), I guess to you their all the same. But folks on the right consider them as bad as the BLM folks and the antifa folks. They say they support Trump, but Trump doesn’t really have control over who supports him.

I really don’t like that you label all Trump supporters at white supremacists.
ProVobis said:
Did he really say this? Hard to prove a negative, you know.
Click to expand...
thefederalist.com

Trump-Hater John Bolton Debunks Anonymous Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump's Veterans Record

Fired former National Security Advisor John Bolton debunked The Atlantic's Trump hit-piece Friday and in his White House memoir.
thefederalist.com thefederalist.com
 
FrankFletcher said:
So much irony here.
Click to expand...
Edited to add quotes
Harris supports gun confiscation by way of “mandatory buybacks,” a distinction without a difference. She insists, “We’re going to have to have smart public policy that’s about taking those off the streets.”
Click to expand...
Last week, President Trump the election will determine the future of private gun ownership in the United States. On Saturday, the NRA tweeted out that a Biden win will destroy the second amendment.

They are right. If Democrats gain control, Joe Biden and Senate Democrats promise a radical change in the Senate by eliminating the filibuster, which will allow them to pass any legislation that they want with a simple majority vote.

This year, the Democrat’s platform is focused on a radical gun control agenda. It advocates licensing for gun owners, allowing gun makers to be held liable whenever someone uses a gun to commit a crime or cause an accident, and banning some types of semi-automatic guns based on appearance rather than on function.

But the Senate won’t just determine what gun control legislation gets passed — it will also determine what judges get confirmed. And there are few issues that divide Democrat and Republican-appointed judges more consistently and completely than gun control.

President Trump’s 53 federal circuit court confirmations have only just brought the courts into balance, with Democrat-appointees still controlling circuit courts for 24 states plus DC. The DC circuit court is considered the second most important court after the Supreme Court.

The states Democrats control judicially are ones that they also tend to control legislatively. These circuit courts approve any and all of the gun control regulations that get passed, no matter how flagrantly they infringe on the right to keep and bear arms.

The Supreme Court isn’t restraining these courts. All four Democrat appointees claim that people don’t have a right to self-defense. Indeed, they have already noted they will vote to overturn the court’s 2008 Heller and 2010 McDonald decisions, and one more Democratic appointment would give them the chance to do so. Those rulings merely ensured the government could not completely ban guns.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
I watched the video yesterday and found it singularly unconvincing. The “violence” from the left consisted mostly of political retribution (at the ballot box). There were threats of “harassment” which was little more than exercising 1sr amendment rights. There was some talk of fisticuffs. The only thing that comes close to going on offense with a gun was the Republican who talked about exploding something, and she made it clear she was talking about a response to personal insults. And of course it ended with the shooting in Portland, with none of the context in which that happened.

Have you also compiled a rebuttal film of the hatred of Republicans for Democrats? You seem comfortable with calling out Democrats for “ the radical left and their Pro abortion, baby murdering, Anti-American, and most importantly Anti-God hate speech.“ With your experience you could probably find lots of footage of that kind of hate speech pretty easily.
 
Dovekin said:
And of course it ended with the shooting in Portland, with none of the context in which that happened.
Click to expand...
Here is the context of what happened in Portland. Looks like the shooter isn’t so much of a martyr now.

www.foxnews.com

Portland's Antifa-supporting gunman appeared to target victim, police say

The avowed Antifa supporter who was a suspect in the killing of a Patriot Prayer member during a clash of opposing groups in Portland, Ore., last Saturday appeared to be targeting the victim prior to the shooting, according to court documents unsealed Friday.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top