GotQuestions says Catholicism is a false religion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyril_Of_Canada
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
"Catholicism is a false religion. If a person believes what the Catholic Church officially teaches, he/she will not be saved…

…The Roman Catholic Church teaches many doctrines that are in disagreement with what the Bible declares. These include apostolic succession, worship of saints or Mary, prayer to saints or Mary, the pope / papacy, infant baptism, transubstantiation, plenary indulgences, the sacramental system, and purgatory…

…the Catholic Church also leads many people away from a genuine faith relationship with Christ…

… The Roman Catholic Church is not the church that Jesus Christ established…"

gotquestions.org/catholicism.html
Thoughts about all this? As a potential convert to Roman Catholicism, It would ease my conscious a bit if these accusations could be addressed. Because I’ll probably face these accusations from protestants I know who wish to keep me from converting.GQ is junk and anti-Catholic propaganda. Witness the fact that they assert that we are not Christians and are not saved, while leading people away from true faith. Complete bunk.

None of their doctrines are found anywhere farther back than a mere 500 years ago and the Catholic Church is the original, New Testament, “full Gospel” Christian church founded by Jesus Christ Himself over 2,000 years ago.

To me, one of the worst problems with GQ is that they are Bible only and that Sola Scriptura false doctrine is nowhere found in the Word of God. Nowhere, I repeat, nowhere does the Bible lay claim to being the final and ultimate authority for all that Christians believe and practice and the adherence to that belief has done nothing but divide Christianity into numerous sects, all of which assert that they are guided by the Holy Spirit and yet cannot agree with each other on their doctrines. How can that disorder be the work of the Holy Spirit? It cannot and so then that leaves only one other source for it…

Take a look at these 3 threads in which I sought to get Biblical support for Sola Scriptura from n-Cs right here on CAF and they could not provide it. You too are welcome to try again, but why reinvent the wheel?

If, SS is not found in the Bible then it violates its own premise and therefore even by it’s own false standards, cannot be a correct Christian doctrine.
 
Got Questions has been around for quite a while. Nothing new.

It is run by S. Michael Houdmann, President of Got Questions Ministries out of Colorado Springs, CO. He graduated Calvary Bible College and Theological Seminary in Kansas City, MO., which describes itself as “Independent nondenominational.” That Mr. Houdmann doesn’t agree with Catholicism is no big surprise.

Lots of Evangelicals take issue with Mr. Houdmann’s doctrines. evangelicaloutreach.org/got-questions.htm

While they all flail around in the ocean, my family and I will stay firmly seated in the Barque of Peter.

-Tim-
 
The Roman Catholic Church teaches many doctrines that are in disagreement with what the Bible declares.
In their errant and badly misinformed opinion…
These include apostolic succession,
Why would that need Biblical support it’s a simple matter of 2,000 years of documented history, but if you insist, look at the election of Matthias in Acts. It’s clear that the succession began with the apostles themselves.
worship of saints or Mary,
As John Martignoni often says, I don’t mind if you disagree with the Catholic Church but please make sure that what you disagree with is something the church actually teaches. See the following.
prayer to saints or Mary,
Again, you need better sources…
The Intercession of the Saints
Is Mary’s and the saints’ intercession unbiblical?
What is the biblical reason Catholics pray to saints for intercession?
the pope / papacy,
:rolleyes: See Pope Fiction
infant baptism,
I’ll take this one from my own blog article. See
The Case For Infant Baptism
transubstantiation,
Again, I can take this one from my own blog article. The Eucharist IS Scriptural
plenary indulgences,
Man you have got a ton of reading and study to do. Better ask the Holy Spirit to help you with this.
Primer on Indulgences
Myths about Indulgences
Defending the Catholic Doctrine of Indulgences Video
the sacramental system,
Here again I’ll take this on my blog article.
“I Find No Sacraments In the Bible” he said.
and purgatory…
And this too…
Biblical and Jewish Traditional Beliefs About Purgatory

Let me know by PM if you have any more questions you want real answers to, but don’t trust anti-Catholics to tell you about our most holy faith. That’s like asking a garbage truck driver to do brain surgery or rocket science.
 
What I find curious about these attacks from “Bible-Christians”* against the Catholic Church is that 95% of the accusations can also be targeted against the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox communion of churches, the Assyrian and Ancient Churches of the East, …

All of these churches have valid apostolic succession (something they attacked), they ask saints and the Virgin Mary to intercede on our behalf (something else they target), most of these churches baptize infants (this too), they have valid sacraments (this as well), they have the Real Presence at Mass or Divine Liturgy (these ancient churches may not have a doctrine of Transubstantiation per se, but the change does happen for them as well), …

  • Not a reference to anyone on CAF, but rather, the author of that GQ article.
 
…the Catholic Church also leads many people away from a genuine faith relationship with Christ…
Since many others have answered all the other issues you brought up, I’d like to focus on this one. Within the Catholic Church, you will find people who have a most intimate relationship with Christ, more so than any evangelical Christian denomination around.

Every day, Catholics around the world take part in the holy sacrifice of the mass. Here they consume our Lord, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity in the Holy Eucharist. How much more intimate can you get?

Every day, Catholics around the world have the opportunity to go to a priest, who sits In Persona Christi (in the person of Christ) to offer forgiveness for their sins.

Everyday, Catholics around the world have the opportunity to sit with the Blessed Sacrament in adoration and prayer. Think about that, you get to sit and hang out with our Lord.

Non-Catholics will point to the rosary and say “You’re praying to Mary” but the rosary, in fact, it a meditation on the Life of Christ. Think about that. Even though you’re asking our Holy Mother for her intercession, you’re meditating on her Son. Everything, every prayer, every mass, every day points directly to Jesus Christ.

To me, the Catholic Church, and all it has to offer, is the absolute best way to have an “intimate faith relationship” with Jesus Christ.
 
Since many others have answered all the other issues you brought up, I’d like to focus on this one. Within the Catholic Church, you will find people who have a most intimate relationship with Christ, more so than any evangelical Christian denomination around.

Every day, Catholics around the world take part in the holy sacrifice of the mass. Here they consume our Lord, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity in the Holy Eucharist. How much more intimate can you get?

Every day, Catholics around the world have the opportunity to go to a priest, who sits In Persona Christi (in the person of Christ) to offer forgiveness for their sins.

Everyday, Catholics around the world have the opportunity to sit with the Blessed Sacrament in adoration and prayer. Think about that, you get to sit and hang out with our Lord.

Non-Catholics will point to the rosary and say “You’re praying to Mary” but the rosary, in fact, it a meditation on the Life of Christ. Think about that. Even though you’re asking our Holy Mother for her intercession, you’re meditating on her Son. Everything, every prayer, every mass, every day points directly to Jesus Christ.

To me, the Catholic Church, and all it has to offer, is the absolute best way to have an “intimate faith relationship” with Jesus Christ.
While I do certainly agree that it is the Catholic Church that Christ founded (Matthew 16:18), do remember that other churches do also celebrate valid sacraments – they also truly consume our Lord, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity in the Eucharist; their priests can also validly forgive sins through the sacrament of Penance.

I’m not sure how Eucharistic Adoration is viewed in the churches of our Eastern brethren, so I won’t comment.

So if the sacramental argument is one wants to make (consumption of our Lord, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, forgiveness of sins via confession, etc.), other churches can legitimately point at themselves and say, “Aha! Wait a minute, we also have that!”
 
While I do certainly agree that it is the Catholic Church that Christ founded (Matthew 16:18), do remember that other churches do also celebrate valid sacraments – they also truly consume our Lord, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity in the Eucharist; their priests can also validly forgive sins through the sacrament of Penance.

I’m not sure how Eucharistic Adoration is viewed in the churches of our Eastern brethren, so I won’t comment.

So if the sacramental argument is one wants to make (consumption of our Lord, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, forgiveness of sins via confession, etc.), other churches can legitimately point at themselves and say, “Aha! Wait a minute, we also have that!”
Notice I said Catholic Church and not Roman Catholic Church. I suppose upon reading the assumption could be that I’m specifically talking about the Western Rite (or “Roman Catholic”) because that’s what most here are a part of, but I was talking about the whole Catholic Church and every rite therein.

Sorry for the confusion.

And I was also using the Sacraments as a way to show that Catholics could potentially have a more intimate relationship with Christ than non-Catholics, because of how close one really gets to Jesus by partaking.
 
Notice I said Catholic Church and not Roman Catholic Church. I suppose upon reading the assumption could be that I’m specifically talking about the Western Rite (or “Roman Catholic”) because that’s what most here are a part of, but I was talking about the whole Catholic Church and every rite therein.

Sorry for the confusion.

And I was also using the Sacraments as a way to show that Catholics could potentially have a more intimate relationship with Christ than non-Catholics, because of how close one really gets to Jesus by partaking.
I don’t think you understood me. I’m talking about other non-Catholic churches here, churches not in communion with the bishop of Rome, Latin or Eastern churches.

The Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox communion of churches, the Assyrian and Ancient Churches of the East; all of these celebrate valid sacraments and their bishops can legitimately trace themselves back to one of Christ’s Apostles. And none of them are in communion with the Catholic Church.
 
“Catholicism is a false religion.”

It’s funny how they declare Catholicism to be a false religion, then they turn around and make a true religion from the holy book of that false religion!

Does doing that make any sense to you?
😃

Nicely executed, sir. 👍
 
"Catholicism is a false religion. If a person believes what the Catholic Church officially teaches, he/she will not be saved…

…The Roman Catholic Church teaches many doctrines that are in disagreement with what the Bible declares. These include apostolic succession, worship of saints or Mary, prayer to saints or Mary, the pope / papacy, infant baptism, transubstantiation, plenary indulgences, the sacramental system, and purgatory…
First of all, I would ask: What makes Catholicism a false religion? What distinctive belief? Is it all of those combined? Is there a certain demarcation? What is that line to be drawn? For nearly all historic Christian denominations (including Protestantism) adheres to some number of items on that list.

Apostolic Succesion? Catholics… but also Eastern Orthodox, Coptic Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox (These four traditions happen to be the OLDEST, most ANCIENT forms of Christianity. Proximity to the time of the Apostles does not guarantee truth, but it’s a pretty darn good sign, don’t ya think?) Apostolic Succession definitely has biblical roots. Many others will address that for you. Go ahead and search Catholic Answers. But remember that the Bible was not completely compiled in the first century. But do you know what was? THE CONCEPT OF APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION. Ignatius of Antioch, who was a bishop in succession to Peter at the church of Antioch, wrote letters on his way to be martyred. In them, he says that bishops settled EVERYWHERE – all parts of the Christian world. These are single, leading bishops of individual churches. These were already established by the AD 100s, when Ignatius was writing.

Apostolic Succession guaranteed the truth to a Christian audience who had to know what the authentic Christian message was. The Bible was not compiled. Even if it was, not everyone could own a Bible before the printing press! It seems odd that God would have the Scriptures as the sole source of Christian information – if for over a thousand the average (and most) Christians were not able to have a Bible.

Prayer to the Saints? First off, Catholics do not worship Mary and the saints. We are smart enough to know who is God and who is human. But we do follow their example, for saints are those who have lived holy lives. Again, the communion of saints is not Catholic-only belief. Many Christians recite the Apostles Creed, which mentions the communion of saints. The eastern Christians venerate Mary and the saints and pray to them. Once again, the oldest Christian traditions continue the practice that has been there from the beginning. When early Christians were martyred, their remains would be collected and the martyrs would be remembered. Their prayers would be asked for in liturgy.

Transubstantiation? That is the Catholic way of explaining how Christ is present in the bread and wine in the Eucharist. But the Real Presence of Christ is as old as Christianity itself. Paul says that the Eucharist is participation in the body and blood of Christ. Jesus tells us that his flesh is real food (John 6), and if he was speaking metaphorically, he would have clarified this to those who walked away from him. Ignatius of Antioch, already mentioned, says that the HERETICS are those who do not profess that the Eucharist is actually Christ’s body and blood.

Can you guess who else holds this view of the Real Presence? Yep, the Orthodox Christians. Again, the oldest Christian traditions… Do you see a pattern? The people at Got Questions do not represent Christianity for the first 1500 years. Even many Protestants accept the mentioned teachings in some form, besides the papacy.

One of these easiest Catholic doctrines to defend is the papacy. It’s a matter of history. Even the Eastern Christians believe that the Pope of Rome has some sort of primacy in the Church. The early Christians were universal in maintaining that the bishop of Rome, the Pope, succeeding St. Peter – and that the Pope’s unique authority came from Peter.
 
Apostolic Succesion? Catholics… but also Eastern Orthodox, Coptic Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox (These four traditions happen to be the OLDEST, most ANCIENT forms of Christianity.
Minor nitpick. The four traditions should actually be Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox and Assyrian/Ancient Church of the East. The Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria (whom you called “Coptic Orthodox” I assume) is part of the Oriental Orthodox communion (which also includes, among others, the Tewahedo Orthodox Church of Ethiopia, the Armenian Orthodox Church, and the Syriac Orthodox Church).

And yes. All four of these have true, legitimate Apostolic Succession. 🙂
 
"Catholicism is a false religion. If a person believes what the Catholic Church officially teaches, he/she will not be saved…

…The Roman Catholic Church teaches many doctrines that are in disagreement with what the Bible declares. These include apostolic succession, worship of saints or Mary, prayer to saints or Mary, the pope / papacy, infant baptism, transubstantiation, plenary indulgences, the sacramental system, and purgatory…

…the Catholic Church also leads many people away from a genuine faith relationship with Christ…

… The Roman Catholic Church is not the church that Jesus Christ established…"

gotquestions.org/catholicism.html

Thoughts about all this? As a potential convert to Roman Catholicism, It would ease my conscious a bit if these accusations could be addressed. Because I’ll probably face these accusations from protestants I know who wish to keep me from converting.
Steer clear of these kinds of websites… they’re the poster children for Invincible Ignorance.
 
Minor nitpick. The four traditions should actually be Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox and Assyrian/Ancient Church of the East. The Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria (whom you called “Coptic Orthodox” I assume) is part of the Oriental Orthodox communion (which also includes, among others, the Tewahedo Orthodox Church of Ethiopia, the Armenian Orthodox Church, and the Syriac Orthodox Church).

And yes. All four of these have true, legitimate Apostolic Succession. 🙂
What distinguishes the Oriental Orthodox, Easter Orthodox, and Assyrian Church? Is it acceptance of councils?
 
…the Catholic Church also leads many people away from a genuine faith relationship with Christ…
The Catholic Church does not purposely lead people away from a genuine faith relationship with Christ. On the contrary, the Catholic Church’s whole reason for being is to help people develop a genuine faith relationship with Christ and the Church’s many divine gifts (sacraments, Magisterium, etc.) makes it especially well-equipped for the task. However, it is a lamentable fact that the Catholic Church doesn’t always do a good job fulfilling its purpose.

Pope John Paul II discussed this in his 1979 Apostolic Exhortation on Catechesis (Catechesi Tradendae), where he said, in part:
  1. The specific character of catechesis, as distinct from the initial conversion - bringing proclamation of the Gospel, has the twofold objective of maturing the initial faith and of educating the true disciple of Christ by means of a deeper and more systematic knowledge of the person and the message of our Lord Jesus Christ.
But in catechetical practice, this model order must allow for the fact that the initial evangelization has often not taken place. A certain number of children baptized in infancy come for catechesis in the parish without receiving any other initiation into the faith and still without any explicit personal attachment to Jesus Christ; they only have the capacity to believe placed within them by Baptism and the presence of the Holy Spirit; and opposition is quickly created by the prejudices of their non-Christian family background or of the positivist spirit of their education. In addition, there are other children who have not been baptized and whose parents agree only at a later date to religious education: for practical reasons, the catechumenal stage of these children will often be carried out largely in the course of the ordinary catechesis. Again, many pre-adolescents and adolescents who have been baptized and been given a systematic catechesis and the sacraments still remain hesitant for a long time about committing their whole lives to Jesus Christ - if, moreover, they do not attempt to avoid religious education in the name of their freedom. Finally, even adults are not safe from temptations to doubt or to abandon their faith, especially as a result of their unbelieving surroundings. This means that “catechesis” must often concern itself not only with nourishing and teaching the faith, but also with arousing it unceasingly with the help of grace, with opening the heart, with converting, and with preparing total adherence to Jesus Christ on the part of those who are still on the threshold of faith. This concern will in part decide the tone, the language and the method of catechesis.
 
What distinguishes the Oriental Orthodox, Easter Orthodox, and Assyrian Church? Is it acceptance of councils?
In a very brief nutshell, because the reason these churches aren’t in communion are very complicated and diverse, yes.

The Eastern Orthodox Church accepts the first seven ecumenical councils.

The Oriental Orthodox churches accept the first three ecumenical councils.

The Assyrian/Ancient Church of the East accept the first two ecumenical councils.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top