R
Robyn_p
Guest
Glad to hear this!Hi All,
Sorry I haven’t been able to respond to the responses I have received here. I greatly appreciate them. I’ve been thinking over carefully, and I would like to admit (happily, because I believe it’s true) that my position on this topic has changed, due in large part to one or two of the arguments presented here (especially in regards to the images in the Temple built without an explicit command).
I’m still not convinced that we should have images or statues representing God himself, but I do admit that I was wrong about images in general (so long as they are not worshipped, of course).
As far as images of God go, do you believe images depicting Christ’s human nature are wrong? Or is it more images of God in His divine nature that you think we should avoid? Just trying to understand your position better.
Interestingly enough, while I’ve seen paintings that have God in them, (I’m thinking right now of the Sistine Chapel) I’ve never once seen an actual statue depicting God in a Catholic Church. There’s always one or two of Christ, and one of the Blessed Mother, and a few saints, but I can’t recall ever seeing one of the Trinity.
This doesn’t mean there aren’t any, obviously, since I haven’t visited every parish in the world, but it does seem to me that statues representing God in his divine nature are pretty rare. It’s possible the Church even discourages them. I’ll have to do more research into this however, since I’m not 100% sure what the Church teaches about this.
But just based on my own experience, it appears the Church might agree with you here.