T
twf
Guest
I always understood that the gravity of theft depends on various factors such as the value of the object stolen and the subjective harm the theft does to the rightful owner. I was told, for example, that stealing $1 from a billionaire is a venial matter, while stealing the last $1 from a starving farmer in a famine stricken land is grave matter. Then on this forum I encountered the idea, from multiple posters, that all theft, no matter how seemingly insignificant, is always grave matter by its very nature. Can someone provide an answer with authoritative references?