R
Roseeurekacross
Guest
this statement is nothing more than an opinion of a Canon Lawyer.
and his statement
isn’t the same thing as what he says with the first statement.
just because he has never lost a case, doesn’t mean he won’t.
- Status
and his statement
just because he has never lost a case, doesn’t mean he won’t.
M
MaryT777
Guest
You know more than a Canon attorney? Really? He has a JD.
His point was that there had to be a reason for any marriage to fail.
His point was that there had to be a reason for any marriage to fail.
M
MaryT777
Guest
You know also more than a lawyer with a degree in Canon law? Hmmmm…My own personal opinion is he will NEVER lose a case.
Let us pray for all involved.
Let us pray for all involved.
R
Roseeurekacross
Guest
the canon lawyer did not actually say he can annul any marriage.
he said
G
Greenfields
Guest
Going to go through my second Anullment petition ,(first marriage found invalid ) it IS a lot of work, and HAS been very good for me writing it all out .I try and be as nuteral as possible so that I am ready to live out my life either way.
M
MaryT777
Guest
same thing; let’s just pray for all involved in this fallible process. I do appreciate that when I asked this Canon attorney if this process was infallible he said “NO”
God bless you and perhaps you would make a great defender of the bond and don’t believe a Catholic marriage should be annulled?
I am sorry but I don’t understand your thoughts on the matter.
God bless you and perhaps you would make a great defender of the bond and don’t believe a Catholic marriage should be annulled?
I am sorry but I don’t understand your thoughts on the matter.
J
JulianN
Guest
I get that he has that opinion. He’s certainly entitled to it. I’m saying that since I’ve personally seen marriages that ended in divorce have their cases denied, he’s wrong.
R
Roseeurekacross
Guest
what I believe or don’t believe is totally irrelevant. although, after watching sky news just now, I believe in white crocodiles.!
all processes are fallible, the only infallible processes relate to the Chair of St Peter and the Pope.
all processes are fallible, the only infallible processes relate to the Chair of St Peter and the Pope.
Last edited:
R
rcwitness
Guest
All cases that have a chance of annulment decree end in divorce. It’s redundant.
And those cases you witnessed were not participated/represented by him. Maybe those cases needed craftier representation?
J
JulianN
Guest
But what he apparently said was,
@ believed every SINGLE Catholic marriage that ended in divorce was “annulable” [/quote said:
Last edited:
R
rcwitness
Guest
“Annulable” doesn’t mean it will always happen.
But under his representation, he would find a way. Or every Catholic divorce has a way, you just have to find it with clever lawyership.
But under his representation, he would find a way. Or every Catholic divorce has a way, you just have to find it with clever lawyership.
J
JulianN
Guest
And I’m saying that’s not true. For example, no matter how “cleverly “ he argues, without witness statements there will be no decree of nullity.
R
rcwitness
Guest
Well, I’ve said before, I appreciate that you lean more towards genuine discernment.
Yet, I’m not him, and maybe he would have a response to your claim.
After all, he is superior in knowledge of the law. Lol
Yet, I’m not him, and maybe he would have a response to your claim.
After all, he is superior in knowledge of the law. Lol
J
JulianN
Guest
You’re assuming things about my level of education. 
R
rcwitness
Guest
Perhaps. If you have a JD or higher.
In any case, he is evidence of a manipulative approach by someone who participates. If the case he participates in doesn’t have someone genuine or with the ability to refute his approach, the case could go in an unjust direction.
Who knows, he may be able to interview people and ask the questions in a way that favors his agenda?
In any case, he is evidence of a manipulative approach by someone who participates. If the case he participates in doesn’t have someone genuine or with the ability to refute his approach, the case could go in an unjust direction.
Who knows, he may be able to interview people and ask the questions in a way that favors his agenda?
M
MaryT777
Guest
Of course. But however he himself has never lost a case. I don’t remotely think his statement was untrue.
M
MaryT777
Guest
I am so happy and glad for you. God bless you .
Not everyone finds it healing though. I did not but only say as such so people that are struggling do not feel alone.
May the peace of Christ that transcends all understanding guard our hearts and mind in Christ Jesus.
Not everyone finds it healing though. I did not but only say as such so people that are struggling do not feel alone.
May the peace of Christ that transcends all understanding guard our hearts and mind in Christ Jesus.
J
JulianN
Guest
I can easily believe he’s never ‘lost’ a case; just not that all marriages that end in divorce are annulable.
M
MaryT777
Guest
Yes and trust me in my humble opinion this Canon lawyer disgusted me but he was willing to “take my case” after two priests said my marriage was NOT going to be annulled.
It’s too insane to even process FOR M or fathom.
It’s too insane to even process FOR M or fathom.
J
JulianN
Guest
A JD is a secular degree. I wouldn’t call his approach manipulative, just arrogant. The person ‘refuting’ him will be the Defender of the Bond, who is equally or more qualified.
- Status