The rationalizations for sexual realignment are very telling. A commentor on my blog enlightened me that there are cases of people who always believed they were meant to be an amputee and voluntarily have healthy and functioning limbs removed. So follow this and see the disconnect:
–An anorexic women walks into a doctor’s office skin and bones and says, “I’m fat. Give me liposuction.” What should the doctor do? Answer: get her to a specialist in eating disorders. You
don’t under any circumstances give her liposuction.
–A man walks in to a doctor’s office and says, “Ever since I was a child, I’ve imagined myself without my left leg. Amputate it.” What should the doctor do? Answer: get him to a psychologist. You
don’t amputate.
–A man walks into a doctor’s office and says, “Ever since I was a child, I felt like a woman trapped in a man’s body. Give me a sex-change operation.” What should the doctor do? Well, common sense would tell us to to do the same thing we did with the anorexic and the wanna-be amputee. But *nooooo, *because this is a pelvic issue that is somehow different.
Anyone who has paid any attention over the years and doesn’t have their head in an ideological fog readily sees that the defenders of homosex and gender-bending are less concerned about fairness than with waging war on Truth and Goodness.