Gun ownership in this day and age

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sftyvlv1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Hi-Point reference was for you, amigo. Of course.
Squirrels can’t afford Glocks. Let alone Sigs.
 
Waaaay too pricey, lol.
They tried to ban FNs in San Francisco. ā€œThey shoot armor piercing rounds!!!ā€
Actually, uh, those rounds are not available to civilians.
 
Last edited:
And they have a significantly lower portion population too. What matters is murder rate per capita and violent crimes per capita. Those show percentages rather than just overall number.

So you’ll find a lower murder rate but higher violent crime rate.
 
And they have a significantly lower portion population too. What matters is murder rate per capita and violent crimes per capita. Those show percentages rather than just overall number.

So you’ll find a lower murder rate but higher violent crime rate.
How are we defining violent crime? Some stats include crimes where violence is merely threatened rather than actual, some don’t. So make sure you’re comparing like with like if you’re comparing different countries.

Lower murder rates are good. Possibly the change in stats of homicide vs violent crime is because (or partly because) more victims are surviving attacks by armed criminals. If so this is a good thing, though of course far from ideal. If gun control brings about a scenario where fewer lives are lost because the weapons used by criminals tend to be less lethal ones like knives, well and good.

And I would argue knives ARE way less lethal. I’ve never heard of any case where a single attacker armed with a knife or knives has managed to kill a dozen people and wound ten more in the space of a mere half a minute - but the Port Arthur gunman did. Nor a case where an assassin armed only with a knife or knives has managed, from the sixth floor of a building, to kill someone and seriously wound another person, both of whom were in a moving vehicle on the street nearby - but Lee Harvey Oswald did just that.
 
Gun control vs. people control. We have lots of firearms in the area I live… and next to no home invasions, etc. Amongst the ā€œlocalā€ population out here, murders, etc. were very rare. As more riff-raff has moved in from other areas, crime has gone way up. They still don’t like trying to kick in front doors in the middle of the night… something about Mr. 12 gauge coming to meet them…

Has to do with the mindset of the person with the weapon, than anything.
 
Because they are used in the kitchen .
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

You sure?
To be fair, these are specialized knives, with specific functions.
But isn’t that also the case with firearms?
 
Last edited:
All guns are designed to kill.
Not true. Firearms are specifically designed for different purposes.

This one is designed to put very precise holes in paper

As is this one

This one is designed to put holes in paper from very long distances

This one is designed to break flying ceramic disks


There are whole models of firearms that are designed to knock down small metal plates ( check out the sport of 3-Gun )

All those are designed for very specific purposes, none of which involve killing. Much like knives or cars.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top