B
babochka
Guest
Nothing. Those who wished to enter religious life would continue to do so in the same manner that they always have.
I had a thread about this a while ago. I believe if secular priests have the option to live in community with other secular priests, it would help more men to solidify their vocation. I think some men are afraid that they will be alone and having the option to live in community might not be a bad option for some.Those who wished to enter religious life would continue to do so in the same manner that they always have.
Then, in all charity, please don’t presume that what you see locally is what is happening everywhere in the Church.Not around here.
No, it really isn’t. And, more to the point, whether it’s “foisted” upon them or not isn’t the point. What’s the point is whether it’s fair to allow a ‘retired’ priest to take on (what you call) a full-time priest’s load. Is that really how you treat your retired priests?This is offensive. … This “work” is not foisted upon them!
Ask. Then tell me I’m smug.What a smug remark. It’s certainly NOT 50-60 hours to 20 hours on call!
First, to answer your questions, the priest would be paid a salary, just as the priest is paid a salary today. Yes, it would need to be more than it currently is, in order to support a family. If the pastor’s children want cars, college educations, etc, etc., then the family would need to budget for these items as any other family does, or tell the children that they can’t afford it. If the family feels that they can’t make it on a single salary, then perhaps the priest’s wife would work - or not. Again, this would be a family decision that would most definitely not be the business of the parishioners. Do you feel the same way if you hear that a celibate priest takes a vacation to some destination that you can only dream about? What if he spends his “parishioners” money on sending his nieces and nephews to Catholic school or he takes care of elderly parents? Do you gripe about supporting his family, or is it only the sex that bothers you? I am happy to give my support to my priest and his family. We (the whole parish) see this as our obligation and wish we could do more for them.so the job of the parish is to support the priest and “his wife & family” so that the pastor can “feel good” about his sexual tensions?
what happens when the pastor’s children want cars, college educations, etc, etc
is that on the parishioners?
in my parish we are lucky to keep the AC on in summer and the snow plowed in the parking lot in winter![]()
(These statistics were compiled from 1500 persons. 500 priests undergoing psychotherapy, 500 priests outside of therapy who shared their stories and their impressions in workshops, discussions and interviews; and a final 500 laypersons who as lovers, abusers, partners or victims who had first-hand experience of the sexual behavior of individual priests not involved with the original 1000. A. W. Richard Sipe; Robert Coles. )
- 20% of U.S. priests are at any given lime involved in a more or less stable sexual relationship with a woman, or with sequential women in an identifiable pattern of behavior. Many of these clerics are devoted partners as well as successful and happy pastors. Obviously a priest need not be emotionally ill to have trouble with celibacy or to have decided against observing it.
- 20% have some homosexual orientation-twice the presumed rate in the general population. Half of these are sexually active-twice the rate of heterosexual priests. These figures are quite low in comparison with other current “guestimates” some of which talk of a 75% gay clergy population in certain dioceses. If present trends continue, the majority will be homosexual by 2010 A.D.
- 80% masturbate, at least occasionally. Many will be impressed by the 20% and the “occasionally.” Controversially the author asserts: “…sometimes masturbation can be an expression of maturity at any age (and at times may be virtuous).” Does it violate celibacy? In legal depositions taken in 1988 one bishop said yes; another bishop from the same diocese said no. The author, inclining toward “yes and no,” estimates that at any given time 20% of U.S. priests indulge in auto-erotic patterns indicative of sexual immaturity.
- 2% are pedophiles in the strict, clinical sense, that is, attracted sexually to prepubescents. Another 4% are preoccupied with adolescents.
- At any given time 40% are practicing at least the letter of the law of celibacy. Another 6 to 8% closely approximate the spirit of celibate love. After passing through the various emotional stages of celibate adjustment, a final 2% humbly but triumphantly embody the true Gospel ideal: profound communion with the Transcendent, seen and loved in all creatures.
I don’t understand why it should be that way for the Eastern Orthodox church?Priests are married to the church and that’s the way it should be
How reliable are these statistics? I thought that it was a mortal sin to have sex outside of marriage? Unless that has changed, why not allow these priests to marry to enable them to have their wife and be in the state of grace at the same time? Why make things so difficult for these priests who I am sure are worthy men who many people would like to see in heaven and not the other place.20% of U.S. priests are at any given lime involved in a more or less stable sexual relationship with a woman,
The data sources are listed in my response, though keep in mind that a sample of 1500 individuals represents a small fraction of the church. These statistics were found to be reliable enough that they have been cited by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops.How reliable are these statistics?
Correct.I thought that it was a mortal sin to have sex outside of marriage?
That would be ideal! I agree with you. I suppprt the married priests that I know. The are just as happy, faithful and fufilled as can be. My hometown priest is married and once told me that “he’s a better priest because of his wife”. I think that’s beautiful. I would support the end of priest celibacy.why not allow these priests to marry to enable them to have their wife and be in the state of grace at the same time?
This is not on the table. Once ordained, priests have never been allowed to marry, East or West.Unless that has changed, why not allow these priests to marry to enable them to have their wife and be in the state of grace at the same time? Why make things so difficult for these priests who I am sure are worthy men who many people would like to see in heaven and not the other place.
I’m immediately suspicious of these statistics because they quote the 10% figure for homosexuals, calling it the “presumed rate in the general population”. Presumed by whom? The source of the figure is the Kinsey report. The flawed methodology of this study is well known. It is the statistic most frequently cited by homosexual activists and is commonly quoted in the media, but no other survey has found this number to be remotely accurate. Most studies show figures between 2% and 4% and women are more likely to be homosexual than men.20% have some homosexual orientation-twice the presumed rate in the general population. Half of these are sexually active-twice the rate of heterosexual priests.
So 2/3 of the respondents were either in therapy or known to have had a sexual relationship with a priest? Doesn’t seem like a neutral sample group to me.(These statistics were compiled from 1500 persons. 500 priests undergoing psychotherapy, 500 priests outside of therapy who shared their stories and their impressions in workshops, discussions and interviews; and a final 500 laypersons who as lovers, abusers, partners or victims who had first-hand experience of the sexual behavior of individual priests not involved with the original 1000. A. W. Richard Sipe; Robert Coles. )
Yeah, no kidding. I guess the mentally stable priests were probably mostly too busy like, ministering to their parishioners to cooperate in what they probably realized would be a biased priest bashing survey.So 2/3 of the respondents were either in therapy or known to have had a sexual relationship with a priest? Doesn’t seem like a neutral sample group to me.