R
redbetta
Guest
If you have had conversations with her about what the Church actually teaches and she still publishes this, then it would be a slap in the face. They should know better.
I hate to say this, but I fail to understand what the sex abuse scandal has to do with women, since the majority of the abused were boys and young men.http://www.patheos.com/blogs/irreverin/2018/08/predator-priests-the-churchs-great-sin-of-patriarchy/
AND I’m so angry and have so many emotions
I usually get along with her, and I usually agree with much of what she has to say. But now I feel sick to my stomach. This on top of all the scandals lately has really got me down…
How do I proceed so I don’t overreact???
I would rebuke her by saying “patriarchy isn’t the issue, clericalism is.”Well, I think her article was about patriarchy in general, and how the Church’s fundamental structure leads to such things like controlling women, abuse, etc. She didn’t connect the sexual abuse to women per se.
Could you please specify?There is no monopoly on doctrinal truth. To them, even the early church erred on a lot of things – especially social/sexual issues
This is best done without much anger and emotion. And honestly, when I read her opinion on women and nfp…she would need to read and understand a lot more before you even start to discuss this. Sadly, she will maybe never read it, but she would be surprised by the dignity of women described in theology of the body.I do want to defend my church