Answers sometimes lead to further questions. Since i’m a Christian who believes that the Scriptures are the foundation for truth and pracitice i will usually go there first. If its not there, then i will look elsewhere for the foundation. Is the foundation in Scripture or in the ideas of men.
Well, I’d say this then. If you walked the earth when Jesus did, Jesus’ teachings appeared to be in His own head, i.e. the teachings of a man. Scriptures were not the foundation for His Truth then and they are not the sole foundation for His Truth now. In fact he separated His Truth from the Law.
Why did Jesus not have a written form of His teachings in place before His crusifixion? Don’t you think with as much weight as you put on the Scriptures Jesus would have given each disciple a copy at least before His Ascension?
If our Lord intended this book we call a Bible to be the whole of His teachings don’t you think He would have put it in writing Himself? I know, there’s no Scriptural foundation for that theory, but again, can’t you just tell us how you feel about that theory instead of quoting something?
The Church would not…could not be wrong on this one. Jesus would have left Peter with a written form of Scripture if He’d intended us to rely solely on that or do you think our Lord made a mistake?
Cause it looks to me that He knew this would be a problem and He would have explicitly said, “Take this Book and read it, it is my word.” No blasphemy intended Lord. I really mean that.
Just give me your thoughts, not a bunch of quotes.