Hal Lindsey World Net Daily Column

[CinciMom]

worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44552

Any thoughts here? I think it is pretty scary imo.

 

[MrS]

considering his past history, giving any credence to Hal Lindsey is scary

 

[gilliam]

Here is what the President said: Any final status agreement must be reached between the two parties, and changes to the 1949 Armistice lines must be mutually agreed to. A viable two-state solution must ensure contiguity of the West Bank, and a state of scattered territories will not work. There must also be meaningful linkages between the West Bank and Gaza. This is the position of the United States today, it will be the position of the United States at the time of final status negotiations.

I am not sure how your suppose to have an agreed upon border with another state, well, if, you don’t agree to it. What would you propose?

 

[Della]

The only reason Lindsay cares one way or the other about Israel is because of his dispensationalist notions regarding the conversion of Israel he thinks can’t happen unless it has control of Jerusalem, etc. His whole outlook on international affairs is colored by his biases based in the faulty theology he has embraced.

How and when Israel will see that Jesus is their true Messiah, no one can know or guess or tell how it will come about. Certainly, if the Church has never dared to speculate on it, I don’t see why anyone should take any dispensationalist’s word for it, no matter how many books he might write on the topic.

 

[BLB_Oregon]

MrS:

considering his past history, giving any credence to Hal Lindsey is scary

My sentiments exactly.

 

[Chickamauga]

Ah, yes…Hal Lindsey… the guy that thinks that descriptions of demons in the Book of Revelation are actually tanks and helicopters… :whacky: