I
INRI
Guest
Just want to add my :twocents: ,
Many of these complaints (but not all) aren’t necessarily about liturgical abuses, just bad taste and liturgical “renewal” gone awry. I have attended masses all over the spectrum from guitar masses, to Tridentine masses, to mass with full orchestra performing the high masses of Mozart, Beethoven, and Haydn (St. Agnes in St. Paul MN in case you’re curious). I definitely have a preference for the indult mass and orchestral masses, but I realize that this is a *preference, *and that the nutty things people to make the mass more “up-to-date” and “relevant” doesn’t invalidate the mass, only make it that much harder to concentrate. I find ironic that in trying to “relevant”, many parishes play music that is either straight out of the 70’s or sounds like it is. I just take comfort that in 30 years, much of this eminantly forgettable music will be just that, forgotten. The Church has an unfortunate tendancy to go with what is thought to be the latest trend in music, only to be stuck with what is already yesterday’s news. As a graduate of music school, I find it ironic that with the greatest musical patrimony of any institution on the planet, stretching back over 1000 years, (gregorian chant, Palestrina, Byrd, Victoria, Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven, Schubert, Bruckner, Dvorak, Gounod) that we are stuck with Hagen, Haas, and Joncas. Heck, even Bach, a non-Catholic, wrote a mass or two. Even my wife, who actually tends towards the charismatic end of things, is brought to tears by the beauty of a well-done indult mass. She likes being able to enter into contemplative prayer during mass without having some overamplified guitar boring some musical monstrosity into our skulls in the spirit of trying to encourage active participation.
BUT, like I said, it is a matter of preference.
Many of these complaints (but not all) aren’t necessarily about liturgical abuses, just bad taste and liturgical “renewal” gone awry. I have attended masses all over the spectrum from guitar masses, to Tridentine masses, to mass with full orchestra performing the high masses of Mozart, Beethoven, and Haydn (St. Agnes in St. Paul MN in case you’re curious). I definitely have a preference for the indult mass and orchestral masses, but I realize that this is a *preference, *and that the nutty things people to make the mass more “up-to-date” and “relevant” doesn’t invalidate the mass, only make it that much harder to concentrate. I find ironic that in trying to “relevant”, many parishes play music that is either straight out of the 70’s or sounds like it is. I just take comfort that in 30 years, much of this eminantly forgettable music will be just that, forgotten. The Church has an unfortunate tendancy to go with what is thought to be the latest trend in music, only to be stuck with what is already yesterday’s news. As a graduate of music school, I find it ironic that with the greatest musical patrimony of any institution on the planet, stretching back over 1000 years, (gregorian chant, Palestrina, Byrd, Victoria, Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven, Schubert, Bruckner, Dvorak, Gounod) that we are stuck with Hagen, Haas, and Joncas. Heck, even Bach, a non-Catholic, wrote a mass or two. Even my wife, who actually tends towards the charismatic end of things, is brought to tears by the beauty of a well-done indult mass. She likes being able to enter into contemplative prayer during mass without having some overamplified guitar boring some musical monstrosity into our skulls in the spirit of trying to encourage active participation.
BUT, like I said, it is a matter of preference.