No, @ProdglArchitect, the argument is not that bad guys can’t be bad guys in fiction; the argument is that it isn’t stuff for children, and that it isn’t Christian.
I read it as a child, as did pretty much all of my friends, siblings, their friends, most of the people I’ve met online in my age range, etc. etc. I’ve never met a single person who had trouble, as a child, understanding that this was the bad guy speaking, and the bad guy was wrong.
It’s only the idiot adults I’ve met who posit anything else.
If my garage sells me a gallon of petrol and I give it to my child along with a box of matches and something goes wrong, no one would blame the garage or the child.
Once again, you and I have very different views about whether or not these books are harmful. I still hold, by the reasons I’ve given already, that these books are not bad, at all.
True. But at the moment I’m simply auguring against the idea that Harry Potter can be lumped with Lord of the Rings and Narnia.
I argue it can’t be.
I agree that LOTR is superior literature, at least in terms of depth and meaning. I place Potter and Narnia about even. Narnia is more explicit allegory, whereas Potter just draws from themes and ideas.
The issue is that most people simply attack it because there is magic in it, while ignoring the magic in other, more accepted, works of literature. I imagine some people attacked Tolkien and Lewis for the magic int heir books as well.