J
JimR-OCDS
Guest
Its exactly whats being taught by Father Keating.But this isn’t what is being taught by the pormoters of CP.
Jim
Its exactly whats being taught by Father Keating.But this isn’t what is being taught by the pormoters of CP.
There are two forms of Lectio Divina, one is Scholastic, which is basically what you describe above, the other is Monastic.carmelite.org/mesters/mesters4.htm
III TEN POINTS FOR PERSONAL LECTIO DIVINA
The attitude of the faithful disciple:
The Lord God has given, me the tongue of those who are taught, that I may know how to sustain with a word the one that is weary. Morning by morning God wakens, wakens my ear to hear as those who are taught. (Is 50:4)
1 Opening prayer, an invocation to the holy Spirit.
2 Slow and attentive reading of the text.
3 A moment of interior silence, to recall what I have read.
4 Look at the meaning of each phrase.
5 Bring the word into the present, ponder it, in relation to life.
6 Broaden my vision by relating this text to other biblical texts.
7 Read the text again, prayer giving a response to God.
8 Formulate my commitment to life.
9 Pray with a suitable psalm.
10 Choose a phrase which captures the meaning and memorise it.
This is the way to practise Lectio Divinia which leads to contemplation God willing.
Yes, John, I knew you’d see the heart of the matter.If we can look at the fruits of those around us we can often see the effects of their prayerful life. We cannot however determine the intention of their heart, but should feel bound to accept that intention as articulated, absent evidence to the contrary.
Hi DaveYes, John, I knew you’d see the heart of the matter.
What frustrates me in these discussions is that we’re focused on the wrong thing and fail to see the forest through the trees.
Everyone is looking at the “means” . . . God cares about the “end” – union with Him. Any means can bring a soul to the true emptiness (i.e. contemplation) described in my previous post just as any means can bring one to false emptiness (i.e. pseudo-contemplation or navel gazing).
What matters is:
If the rosary leads a soul to union; God rejoices. If lectio leads a soul to union; God rejoices. If vocal prayer leads a soul to union; God rejoices. If simple gazing on Him before the tabernacle leads a soul to union; God rejoices. And yes, dare I say it, if CP leads a soul to union; God rejoices.
- the intention of the soul
- the grace by which God leads it to a specific way of prayer
- and the effects/fruits/virtue produced by that way of prayer
Dave.
Absolutely there are erroneous ways of praying and Quietism was the specific heresy Bl. John Ruusbroec was addressing in the post I made that defined “false emptiness.” We need to note, however, what these specific Quietists were professing: mass and confession are unnecessary, acts of virtue unimportant . . . all that matters was pursuing the quasi-stupor of the absorption of the faculties. In today’s terms we’d call this an altered-state of consciousness; completely man-made and un-spiritual. St. Teresa spoke of this at some length as well.Can I ask you wny then in that case would the Church forbid the use of certain prayer methods like that of ‘Quietism’, which was a grave error in prayer. There are erroneous ways of praying aren’t there?
Dave, exactlyYes, John, I knew you’d see the heart of the matter.
What frustrates me in these discussions is that we’re focused on the wrong thing and fail to see the forest through the trees.
Everyone is looking at the “means” . . . God cares about the “end” – union with Him. Any means can bring a soul to the true emptiness (i.e. contemplation) described in my previous post just as any means can bring one to false emptiness (i.e. pseudo-contemplation or navel gazing).
What matters is:
If the rosary leads a soul to union; God rejoices. If lectio leads a soul to union; God rejoices. If vocal prayer leads a soul to union; God rejoices. If simple gazing on Him before the tabernacle leads a soul to union; God rejoices. And yes, dare I say it, if CP leads a soul to union; God rejoices.
- the intention of the soul
- the grace by which God leads it to a specific way of prayer
- and the effects/fruits/virtue produced by that way of prayer
Dave.
Quietism isn’t a form of prayer per se, but a doctrine.Hi Dave
Can I ask you wny then in that case would the Church forbid the use of certain prayer methods like that of ‘Quietism’, which was a grave error in prayer. There are erroneous ways of praying aren’t there?
In the Living Prayer of my life
Yes it is a form of prayer that led to a doctrine. A set of spiritual teachings that advocated a way of praying and disposing oneself to God to achieve union.
Not really;Yes it is a form of prayer that led to a doctrine. A set of spiritual teachings that advocated a way of praying and disposing oneself to God to achieve union.
St. Teresa of Avila and St. John of Cross, were at first accused of practicing Quietism.It was the Spaniards Michael de Molinos who developed Quietism in the strictest sense of the term. From his writings, especially from his “Dux spiritualis” (Rome, 1675), sixty-eight propositions were extracted and condemned by Innocent XI in 1687 (Denzinger-Bannwart, 1221 sqq.). The key-note of the system is contained in the first proposition: man must annihilate his powers and this is the inward way (via interna); in fact, the desire to do anything actively is offensive to God and hence one must abandon oneself entirely to God and thereafter remain as a lifeless body (prop. 2). By doing nothing the soul annihilates itself and returns to its source, the essence of God, in which it is transformed and divinized, and then God abides in it (5). In this inward way, the soul has not to think either of reward or of punishment, of heaven or hell, of death or eternity. It must not concern itself about its own state, its defects, or its progress in virtue; having once resigned its will to God it must let Him work out His will without any action of the soul itself (7-13). He who has thus committed himself entirely to God must not ask anything of God, or render thanks to Him; must take no account of temptations nor offer any active resistance; “and if nature be stirred one must permit its stirring because it is nature” (14-17). In prayer one must not use images or discursive thought, but must remain in “obscure faith” and in quiet, forgetting every distinct thought of the Divine attributes, abiding in God’s presence to adore, love and serve Him, but without producing any acts because with these God is not pleased. Whatever thoughts arise during prayer, even though they be impure or against faith, if they are not voluntarily encouraged nor voluntarily expelled but are suffered with indifference and resignation, do not hinder the prayer of faith but rather enhance its perfection. He who desires sensible devotion is seeking not God but himself; indeed every sensible effect experienced in the spiritual life is abominable, filthy, unclean (18-20).
DaveWe possess and enjoy God by union with his will, and we deceive ourselves if we imagine we can have this delight by any other means. Union with his will is the unique means. There is no special way of achieving this, for he can ensure it by any means he wants. God unites his will to ours in a thousand different ways, and the one he employs in our case is always the best for us. We should honor and love them all, for they are all arranged by God to suit each individual soul to bring about this union. We must hold fast to what he chooses and make no choice for ourselves, yet be eager to revere and love whatever he fixes upon for other people. For instance, if God wants me to use vocal prayers and enjoy spiritually moving devotions, I should still love and venerate the silence and the dark night which the faith of others brings them. But, as far as I am concerned, I shall use the duties of the present moment and by them be united with God. I shall not, as the Quietists do, believe that true religion means doing nothing, for we become holy by the law of God, and he always makes all he chooses useful to us.
Not exactly. When we become aware of distracting thoughts or even lofty thoughts of God, we are to let go of them. However, thoughts from God, once we become aware of them, they too we should let go rather than attempting to grasp onto them. St. John of the Cross teaches this. Whatever grace we receive from God, is given to us in full, and we don’t need to dwell on the thought any further. In fact to do so, we will generally add our own commentary to the thought and distort it.Another thing to consider. God uses all that man is to communicate with him, so indeed God may allow the mind of a soul to have a thought during prayer, a given light, or series of thoughts and in CP these are told to be letten go of.
Really, you need to stop telling us what Centering Prayer is. I’m not trying to be rude, but comments like this only prove that you don’t know what you’re talking about.These thoughts are often a source of grace to the soul and a deepening of the truths of faith that the soul already believes in but which is enriched in the soul during prayer. To this end in cp the person is conducting prayer and God is not. Prayer is a gift we are to be led in by the Holy Spirit and not to control it ourselves.
No they weren’t and nor were they practising centering prayer.Not really;
St. Teresa of Avila and St. John of Cross, were at first accused of practicing Quietism.
Of course they were not.
Jim
Again I am ignorant and you are not.blessedstar
Not exactly. When we become aware of distracting thoughts or even lofty thoughts of God, we are to let go of them. However, thoughts from God, once we become aware of them, they too we should let go rather than attempting to grasp onto them. St. John of the Cross teaches this. Whatever grace we receive from God, is given to us in full, and we don’t need to dwell on the thought any further. In fact to do so, we will generally add our own commentary to the thought and distort it.
Really, you need to stop telling us what Centering Prayer is. I’m not trying to be rude, but comments like this only prove that you don’t know what you’re talking about.
The rest of your post is nothing more than your own personal opinion and not what Centering Prayer is about.
If you refuse to learn about Centering Prayer as Father Keating teaches it, and experience it for yourself, there’s no way you’re going to be accurate in describing what it is.
God Bless
Jim