I always felt like DR’s budget guidelines were pretty lenient. I’m a member of a couple of message boards full of DR followers and we are way, way more gazelle than Dave ever thought of being. And I think part of Dave’s goal in being debt free and saving up an emergency fund is so he can afford to buy toys like boats and not have to have collection agencies calling his house at all hours of the day and night threatening his wife.
Also, it is just responsible to pay for your own food, housing, hobbies and clothing if you can afford it and not assume society is going to take care of you when you are perfectly well able to care for yourself. Now, if you aren’t perfectly well able to care for yourself, that is another story. But if you want me to pay for your basic food and housing costs because you spent all your money on a lavish lifestyle you couldn’t afford, that’s a problem for me.
You can just go get Dave Ramsey’s (or anybody else’s) books at the library for free if you don’t want to pay him for his advice. His radio show is also free to listen to.
I think a lot of people who are on public aid would be very hurt by your accusation that they got that way because of living a “lavish lifestyle.”
In this day and age in the United States, most people on public aid got that way because they were born into families that were already on public aid (often to single mothers with no male relative living in the house). These children of poverty grow up not learning the skills needed to be able to live on their own with no government help. They do not learn the simple skills like getting up on time, going to school everyday, keeping regular sleeping hours, doing the assignments that the teacher gives each day, staying chaste, avoiding alcohol and drugs (as teenagers), etc.
And in many of the urban areas (like Chicago, which is near where I live), many of these poor children are forced into gangs whether they want to be in them or not, and this contributes to their downfall by getting them involved with immoral and dangerous activities that generally kill them early in life.
The only way out of gang life, other than death, is to escape from the City and move somewhere rural, but again, these families do not possess the skills to live on their own.
Of course, people can be taught how to live on their own, but the teachers, materials, and facilities for the teaching cost money and guess who pays for it? (Taxpayers.) So even when they are trying to help themselves, these poor families end up accepting government aid.
It’s a horrific cycle of misery, and it’s very difficult for us taxpayers to keep paying and paying for this kind stuff, but what choice do we have?! These people aren’t living on government aid because they chose a lavish lifestyle. They’re there because they were born into it and can’t escape.
Does Dave Ramsey teach that we should despise those people who receive government aid?
I don’t know ANYONE in my circle of acquaintances who “lived a lavish lifestyle” and ended up broke. Anyone. Also, of course, there is the question of “what is a lavish lifestyle?” For some people, making macaroni and cheese from scratch is “living a lavish lifestyle,” because you can buy cheap mac and cheese in a box.
Another reason why people end up on government aid is due to addictions, mainly drugs, alcohol, and gambling. These three vices destroy lives and families, and put the victims–yes, victims! onto the streets and at the mercy of the government. I say victims because most people would say that there is nothing wrong with alcohol, certain drugs used for medical purposes, and gambling. Lots of people are able to use these without becoming addicted–but some people DO become addicted, and end up losing everything.
Often, their rehab is paid for by the government (taxpayers), and it still doesn’t work, and these people end up addicted and dependent for the rest of their lives. It’s an awful disease.
Does Dave Ramsey teach that we should despise the addicted people?