No intention of offending here, either. Trophy parish is a term of admiration. If mine were so successful, I’d rejoice. And I have no bitterness whatsoever toward the Pastoral Provision, or the AU (I have mentioned that the AU parish in my town was a sort of sister parish to my own Continuing Anglican one. And that an artist friend of mine did the frontispiece for the AU Book of Divine Worship) I like the AU. I just don’t think it has a chance of being a viable part of the RCC, in any serious sense, as it is currently structured.
The problem of no priests when the first convert priest passes away is precisely what I was speaking of. Until this is changed, there will not be much of an increase in the parishes. And it is most certainly true that not every RC Bishop wants an AU parish in his diocese.
I did look at the homepage sites of the 7 parishes listed on the Pastoral Provision site, and it confirms what I was saying about the AU Texas parishes, and all other AU parishes, as I was pretty sure it might. I am not sure about the date of establishment for one parish outside Texas (St. Athanasius), but I think it’s date was 1997. And for one of the Texas parishes (St. Anselm, a mission), no date was given. So, calculating the average age for the Texas parishes (3 of the 4), one gets 23 years. For the other 3 parishes, 5.6 years. Given that the Pastoral Provision has been in existence for around 29 years, it is evident that as most of the parishes form, they also pass away. For reasons of no priest, or other reasons. My point is that until there is a prelature established for the AU, that is, unless it becomes a Rite, it will not increase, based on its history to date.
And, as I said, no offense intended, really. If I’m wrong, and AU parishes start multiplying, good; I’ll cheer. But I’ll also be surprised.
GKC