Has anyone changed there mind here?

  • Thread starter Thread starter latinmass
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As a late comer to this thread, I would say that this place probably not accompished what some wish for, that is the conversion of Catholic to their opinion of Catholicism, but that is an strange thing to desire. However, do not view all the talk her as unproductive. I know that I have changed my opinion about some specific issues and gained a greater respect for the faithful traditionalists. While I do not prefer Latin, I desire that the TLM be more sidespread for the sake of those who desire it. I also look for the further integration of Latin into the other Masses. I would like to see the priest return to the eastern orientation. I understand these issues better.

Also, as long as the more extreme forms of traditionalism are allowed to post here that encourage faithlessness and disobedience, I think that needs to be addressed by those faithful to the Holy Pontiff. Perhaps my greatest admiration of all posters are for those who are very traditional, yet remain faithful. They have a good handle on how far is too far when it comes to dissent.
 
As a late comer to this thread, I would say that this place probably not accompished what some wish for, that is the conversion of Catholic to their opinion of Catholicism, but that is an strange thing to desire. However, do not view all the talk her as unproductive. I know that I have changed my opinion about some specific issues and gained a greater respect for the faithful traditionalists. While I do not prefer Latin, I desire that the TLM be more sidespread for the sake of those who desire it. I also look for the further integration of Latin into the other Masses. I would like to see the priest return to the eastern orientation. I understand these issues better.

Also, as long as the more extreme forms of traditionalism are allowed to post here that encourage faithlessness and disobedience, I think that needs to be addressed by those faithful to the Holy Pontiff. Perhaps my greatest admiration of all posters are for those who are very traditional, yet remain faithful. They have a good handle on how far is too far when it comes to dissent.
I just wish that there was some way for those of us who are fairly new to the Church to KNOW on this board who exactly people really are and what they are really espousing so that we won’t be tricked.

After my experiences in the evangelical world (we were kicked out of our Protestant church by pastors claiming that they were following the Bible), I am extremely distrustful of people. I am absolutely paranoid about being led astray in this huge Church of Christ.

Some people are just plain nasty and mean. I don’t care if these people are straight and narrow orthodox Catholics and are teaching exactly what Jesus wants taught–the fact remains that Jesus said that those who don’t have love are NOTHING. He said that we will know His followers by their love for one another. People who call names and use snide sarcasm to insult others are NOT showing tough love, they are showing pride of self and hatred, and to me, THIS is good reason to utterly dismiss anything these people post. No love = no Jesus.

Some people are just the opposite–kind and sweet. But their words seem dangerous. They talk of things that make me squirm. One person on this forum told me that it is the duty of all Catholics to disobey even the Pope when he espouses something that is contrary to the traditions of the Catholic Church, and that the NO Mass is contrary to the traditions of the Catholic Church, therefore, all those popes who have endorsed this form of Mass should be disobeyed.

That made my radar go up. I think it’s wrong teaching.

But she sounded so nice.

Like I said, I wish that there were “police” on this Board who would step in and make it clear when someone is totally out of step with the teaching of the Catholic Church. I don’t always recognize the schismatics, the sedavants-whatevers (can’t spell it), the heretics, the troublemakers, the Protestants who are pretending to be Catholic, etc.

I wish we were asked (not required) to take a survey when we join CAF, and the results would place us in a category, which would be posted next to our names. The survey would be available for all members to check to refresh their memories.

I’ve taken “Catholic Surveys” before that place me in the “Traditional Orthodox” category–YES, me, Cat! Even though I answer the questions about TLM in the negative, I still get placed in the Traditional/Orthodox category because of my understanding and acceptance of Catholic teachings.

So I know that such a survey would be possible, and it would do all of us a big favor to KNOW that Cat is “Traditional/Orthodox,” and someone else is “Schismatic” or “Modernist” or “Neo-Pagan” or “Protestant” etc. etc. As long as we could check out the survey and see what the labels meant, it would be OK.

And it would sure help us to filter the comments correctly and not be led astray.
 
CAT - beautiful post. You said it well and to the point. I am with you 100%
Deacon ed B
 
I just wish that there was some way for those of us who are fairly new to the Church to KNOW on this board who exactly people really are and what they are really espousing so that we won’t be tricked.

Like I said, I wish that there were “police” on this Board who would step in and make it clear when someone is totally out of step with the teaching of the Catholic Church. I don’t always recognize the schismatics, the sedavants-whatevers (can’t spell it), the heretics, the troublemakers, the Protestants who are pretending to be Catholic, etc.

I wish we were asked (not required) to take a survey when we join CAF, and the results would place us in a category, which would be posted next to our names. The survey would be available for all members to check to refresh their memories.

So I know that such a survey would be possible, and it would do all of us a big favor to KNOW that Cat is “Traditional/Orthodox,” and someone else is “Schismatic” or “Modernist” or “Neo-Pagan” or “Protestant” etc. etc. As long as we could check out the survey and see what the labels meant, it would be OK.
.
The mods are the police

The survey already is in place.

You can give as much detail in your bio as you wish.

You can give yourself a particular signature to further clarify.

.
 
I wish it were that easy MrS. I’ve met a LOT of people who say they’re Catholic, but they don’t agree with the teachings of the Church. I’ve met a few people who claim they’re loyal to the Pope, but they have all sorts of tricky ways of defining just how they practice that obedience.

Frankly, if somebody believes that the Novus Ordo does not result in a valid Eucharist, I’d like to know that about them before I read one word of what they have to say. If somebody believes that it’s better to attend an SSPX chapel than a diocesan Mass, I’d like to know that, too. (And, if somebody thinks we’ve got a “Jewish Problem” I would kinda like to know…) Because that’s going to influence how I take everything they say regarding Catholicism. You betcha.
 
I wish it were that easy MrS. I’ve met a LOT of people who say they’re Catholic, but they don’t agree with the teachings of the Church. I’ve met a few people who claim they’re loyal to the Pope, but they have all sorts of tricky ways of defining just how they practice that obedience.

Frankly, if somebody believes that the Novus Ordo does not result in a valid Eucharist, I’d like to know that about them before I read one word of what they have to say. If somebody believes that it’s better to attend an SSPX chapel than a diocesan Mass, I’d like to know that, too. (And, if somebody thinks we’ve got a “Jewish Problem” I would kinda like to know…) Because that’s going to influence how I take everything they say regarding Catholicism. You betcha.
Agreed… thus the only way might be trial and error. Reading threads often will reveal a posters “general” position on things. The CAF allows for one to create an ignore list. Nice idea. But if that poster is off base, we should do just the opposite of ignore… we should make effort to present our thoughts and where we differ. Who know, we might even find out that we are wrong on a certain matter.:rolleyes:

That said, I now have a question for you.

Can you expand on the comment about the Jewish Problem… perhaps on a new thread so as not to derail this one… or in a PM… or just as an extra comment in the next post?

.
 
Studying the actual teachings of the Church is an excellent way of separating the opinion from the truth.
 
Actually it’s two generations of Catholics. “Children of Winter” is a book by James Demers where he chronicles the abandonment of values (particularly in Catholic schools) leading to the corruption of children in the schools themselves. Part of the long term plan of undermining the faith has been a period of abandonment, People raised in the 50’s received one kind of Catholic education (flawed but at least foundational) In the 60’s changes were introduced, in the 70’s new emphasis was placed on socialization, humanism and secularization. This continued through the 1980’s and into the 1990’s. Now Catholic education is being taught again, but it is a watered-down Catholicism and these children can’t go to their parents (like I could) in order to find the missing elements of their education.
I will agree with you for the most part. However I think you will find the conservatism among GEN X fairly prominent. Even those of my generation who grew up “liberal” would be considered far removed from the extremist liberalism we find today. We are definately the most cynical generation. We grew up in the shadow of the cold war that peaked during middle school and junior high. Our leadership reference point is Ronald Reagan. We were the first latch key kids who had no mother to come home to after school thanks to the false feminism of the “LIB” movement that has changed the dynamics of family life to this day. We are significantly sceptical and are VERY thristy for authority(unlike the boomers before us…who by the way are the one generation that does not blend well with us Xers). There are not very many of us because there wasn’t very many of our parents…we are the children of the silent Generation. based on our parents who still had the good Catholic education and our comfort with heirarchial structures… we are the ones who hanker for the traditions that were pilliaged from our youth…which explains some of the animosity between us and the boomers. As the boomers fade and fall off the earth…it is us 35-45 year olds that are going to be stuck fixing the mess…(while the boomers children engage in secular humanism) It is the boomers children who are going to be walking away from the church in hordes…towards nothingness atheism and agnosticism…at least in my neck of the woods. As for my generation…we walked away too (except for me) and filled the ranks of converts to evangelical Christendom. The “project” of the 60s and 70s has successfully made heaven less crowded. Thankfully those of us who had children at very young ages can join our children…marching on with the reform of the reform.
 
You know… I actually didn’t know there was an ignore feature! Thanks for that!

I think there has been a thread on antisemitism on here in the past week or so. To comment further would totally derail this thread. 🙂
 
That made my radar go up. I think it’s wrong teaching.
It sounds like your radar is working just fine. Thankfully we have a most wonderful tool to keep our perspective in the midst of sectarianism. It is the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Keep it close and it will keep you safe.
 
I agree with your comments on the CCC. In other threads, I have had people argue that it is wrong in places, or at best being misinterpreted. I pray for these. In the words of Frances Cardinal Arinze about the CCC, “Read it, eat it, digest it.”
Deacon Ed B
 
I agree with your comments on the CCC. In other threads, I have had people argue that it is wrong in places, or at best being misinterpreted. I pray for these. In the words of Frances Cardinal Arinze about the CCC, “Read it, eat it, digest it.”
Deacon Ed B
I don’t understand your logic here. You say people have argued that there are misinterpretations or errors. Well? Were there or weren’t there?

Why is Cardinal Arinze’s opinion so important? What if Cardinal Kaspar or Cardinal Martino had said it?

Cardinal Schonborn (who was the principal architecht of the CCC) encourages Catholics to also read the Catechism of Trent.
 
I don’t understand your logic here. You say people have argued that there are misinterpretations or errors. Well? Were there or weren’t there?

Why is Cardinal Arinze’s opinion so important? What if Cardinal Kaspar or Cardinal Martino had said it?

Cardinal Schonborn (who was the principal architecht of the CCC) encourages Catholics to also read the Catechism of Trent.
Is that the same Cardinal Arinze who considers “horizontal” liturgy heretical? And the vertical liturgy more Christ centered?:rolleyes:

The same Cardinal who calls the abuses-made-norms just what they are.:rolleyes:

He is a gem. Would that more Cardinals were like him.
 
I wish it were that easy MrS. I’ve met a LOT of people who say they’re Catholic, but they don’t agree with the teachings of the Church.
This is interesting. From my perspective, I’ve met a lot of people that say they’re Catholic but they believe in things that are not actual teachings of the Church.
I’ve met a few people who claim they’re loyal to the Pope, but they have all sorts of tricky ways of defining just how they practice that obedience.
But then again, some people don’t have accurate understandings of what loyalty and obedience are.
Frankly, if somebody believes that the Novus Ordo does not result in a valid Eucharist, I’d like to know that about them before I read one word of what they have to say. If somebody believes that it’s better to attend an SSPX chapel than a diocesan Mass, I’d like to know that, too. (And, if somebody thinks we’ve got a “Jewish Problem” I would kinda like to know…) Because that’s going to influence how I take everything they say regarding Catholicism. You betcha.
Isn’t that the very definition of prejudice? Isn’t it better to ask questions and look for reliable support in the traditions and writings of the Church and Church Fathers and Doctors?

Isn’t it a good idea to ask yourself why you believe what you believe and look to see if you are actually correct before you either ignore or pass judgement on what someone else has to say?
 
Is that the same Cardinal Arinze who considers “horizontal” liturgy heretical? And the vertical liturgy more Christ centered?:rolleyes:

The same Cardinal who calls the abuses-made-norms just what they are.:rolleyes:

He is a gem. Would that more Cardinals were like him.
MrS, forgive my slowness. Are you being sarcastic in this post? I think you are because you have rolling eyes guys. But I’m not sure.

Everyone, when people are sarcastic, it just muddies the waters!!! I already don’t know who Cardinal Arinze is. I’m still not sure if he’s a good Catholic or a bad Catholic! And after reading this post, I’m even less sure! Please, someone tell me straight out, with no clever quips.

I could go Google him, but for every article I find that says he’s great, I’ll find another article that says he’s a heretic. How is that helpful?! Especially when I don’t know who is writing the articles! I could google them, but for every article I find that says they are great, I’ll find another article that says they’re heretics! Around and around and around! And I still won’t know for sure!

BTW, for those of you who say to read the CCC, I do that. But the CCC does NOT mention specific names of people or organizations and list them as “Safe” or “Unsafe.”

And when I am told to check with the Magisterium, please explain . Is there a website called “Magisterium Hotline” where I can type in a name or organization, and get a printout straight from the Church Itself pronouncing favor or disfavor, and giving big red WARNING signal for persons or organizations that are dangerous to my faith?

Those of you who have grown up in the Catholic faith probably know all about Cardinal Arinze and some of the other personalities and things that have come up on this thread. But please, please remember that those of us who are converts have no idea who or what you are talking about! And satire just makes it worse for us! We don’t even recognize that you are making a joke!

Jesus said “Let your yes be yes and your no be no.” I think it would be good for all of us to remember that.
 
At the last consistory, I was hoping one of two cardinals would be elected. They were Francis Cardinal Arinze, and Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger. In no particular order. I was most pleased with the one elected, and even happier when he chose the name of Benedict, as I have been a Benedictine Oblate since 1962. I can assure you that if you follow the advice and teaching of Cardinal Arinze, you will never go wrong. The same goes for our Holy Father Benedict XVI
Deacon Ed B
 
“For as many as are of God and of Jesus Christ are also with the bishop. And as many as shall, in the exercise of repentance, return into the unity of the Church, these, too, shall belong to God, that they may live according to Jesus Christ. Do not err, my brethren. If any man follows him that makes a schism in the Church, he shall not inherit the kingdom of God. If any one walks according to a strange opinion, he agrees not with the passion of Christ.”
St. Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Philadelphians, 3.2, ca. A.D. 110
 
MrS, forgive my slowness. Are you being sarcastic in this post? I think you are because you have rolling eyes guys. But I’m not sure.

.
Sorry… I had hoped that by calling him a gem, it would be clear that this man is truly that.

His interview on EWTN on abuses was so good. With a bit of humor he addressed each abuse which Raymond Arroya asked him about.

Where ever he goes he is treated as special, and he is. I do tend to practice wit… and I am successful half the time, but again apologies if you were confused.

.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top