S
Sister_Amy
Guest
Okay, I guess you see there being two different possibilities–either personal interpretation or official interpretation.So it all depends on personal interpretation? What about major interpretations such as Jihad? I believe that there originally was an official interpretation because Muhammed would have meant one thing when telling people everything. He wouldn’t have just said it and told people to interpret it how they liked, otherwise no-one would know the original meaning of the Qu 'ran and Muslims would no-longer be able to say that Islam has never been altered.
Also, it would mean that people are correct when they say that the Qu 'ran tells Muslims to kill the unbelievers because there is no official interpretation to say otherwise.
But the world’s not so limited. Individual persons aren’t entitled to subject the Qur’an to their personal interpretation, however. The Qur’an is in many places open to a variety of interpretations, so selecting one to be “official” doesn’t do justice to the Qur’an.
Before one is allowed to interpret the Qur’an, however, he needs to have really studied the sound/authentic interpretations before him. Basically, we get interpretations about the Qur’an from (1) the Qur’an itself, (2) the one to whom it was revealed, pbuh, (3) his companions, and their students, and then the scholars of the religion who studied these (above) and expounded further.
When the Qur’an talks about going to war, it’s talking to a state, an organized government leading Muslims. Not to a random Muslim living next door. That’s why personal interpretation isn’t accepted. But scholarly interpretation isn’t exactly uniform because sometimes different interpretations are possible.
Most of the passages about war need to be understood in their context, and not just in their Qur’anic context, but also their place in the history of Islam, and in the history of the life of the Messenger, pbuh. So someone who’s not a scholar isn’t allowed to go in and say “Oh, I’m supposed to fight so-and-so,” because he doesn’t understand when that passage might apply, the restrictions on it, and when some other action supersedes it.
Don’t think that because there’s not an “official” interpretation that there aren’t restrictions on who is allowed to interpret it. Otherwise anyone could make up anything and justify it with the Qur’an.
