Has the #MeToo movement become a witch-hunt to a significant degree?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxirad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wrote: “Can you point me to any Red Pill guys who have been married a long time, have kids at home, and seem thrilled by having to do all the initiating? I’ve browsed a lot of Red Pill comment threads, and the wife never initiating is a common sore point. In the context of a long-term relationship, it isn’t nice to always have to be the person who asks.”

SST replied:
You are missing the point, the Red Pill exists to solve those problems, so of course it will attract people who report those problems and are willing to reject their conditioning. Using your logic I could reasonably conclude that feminism is bad for women since so many of them have or had problems with men.
Some thoughts:

–I didn’t mean to point out the large number of unhappily married Red Pill men (although that’s a fair point), but to point out the absence of any Red Pill guys who have been married for a while who have to do all the initiating themselves and like to do so. Having the wife initiate and be obviously interested is actually a major “get” in that environment (and in the larger male population, too, I suspect). For long-married men, being expected to do all initiating tends to be viewed as an unfair burden (and I’ve seen a lot of griping in Red Pill-land about “duty sex” and “starfish”).
–Another thing that comes to mind is that energy levels tend to be rather lower from 40 on, so how one feels about having to do all the initiating is going to be very different at 45 than at 25. You can ask around if you don’t believe me.
–Related: Having to tell another adult what to do all the time is potentially a huge energy suck and drain on overall productivity. It’s not typically a very productive lifestyle (see, for example, Afghanistan or Yemen or Saudi Arabia), and it can be confining and limiting. As Frederick Douglass famously said, “No man can put a chain about the ankle of his fellow man without at last finding the other end fastened about his own neck.” Or fellow woman, for that matter. This is presumably the reason that Red Pill married men so often discourage their single brethren from getting married–the style of marriage they advocate is also burden to the man.
–I’m going to go out on a limb and say that in a typical happy marriage, each spouse makes sexual overtures at different times.
–“Using your logic I could reasonably conclude that feminism is bad for women since so many of them have or had problems with men.” Here’s a dissimilarity. Many women (who you would describe as feminists) claim to have happy egalitarian marriages.

Edited to add: The Red Pill marriage model is very, very hard on men. It’s just not realistic to expect to be able to be “on” all the time, especially not as one ages.
 
Last edited:
Many women (who you would describe as feminists) claim to have happy egalitarian marriages.
Ah, but such marriages are inherently inferior for…some reason. I dunno, ask Roosh V. He’s almost 40 and hasn’t found his baby-faced virgin bride yet, but trust me, he knows.
 
Maybe I’m scraping from the bottom of the barrel, but…this is actually very intuitive.
–February is a slow month for big new movies (the big releases are usually Christmas or summer), so it’s easier to look big in February.
–It’s being sold as a Valentine’s film. (Yeah, I know.)
–The movie-going audience is slowly shrinking–fewer tickets were sold in 2017 than in 1997, despite the fact that the population is growing.

https://www.the-numbers.com/market/

–The trailer for the new FSOG is WAY better than the one for the first one. I haven’t read the books or watched the movies, but I’ve watched both trailers recently, and the first one is grey, boring, and scary (seriously, it looks like a horror film), whereas the third one has: Anastasia in pretty wedding dress! private jet! romantic vacation in Europe! jetski! car chase! house remodeling! peril! kidnapping! blackmail! Even just from the trailers, there’s a lot more going on in the third one than just Anastasia getting whacked by a creepy billionaire.
 
Last edited:
It is now quite common for couples to live together without being married and have several children together. No need to be promiscuous or have IVF to be the single mother of several children.
I know. I’m only in my thirties. Living together, with or without children, though, IS promiscuous. The Church does not condone sexual activity outside of marriage.
 
Last edited:
Living together, with or without children, though, IS promiscuous.
That’s not what promiscuous means.

Literally the first definition that pops up on my computer is “having or characterized by many transient sexual relationships.”

Fornicating with one person does not qualify as promiscuous.
 
Last edited:
No. That is not the definition of promiscuous.

Promiscuous means having many sexual partners.

Living in sin with one man and being faithful to him in spite of the lack of marriage vows does not make one promiscuous. It may make one a fornicator but not necessarily promiscuous.
 
Last edited:
I would be more interested in their husbands’ assessments of their marriages. Of course those assessments would be completely anonymous and a nice bottle of scotch would be necessary in order to ensure accuracy.
 
Fornicating with one person does not qualify as promiscuous.
Okay, just sinful then. Feminists don’t like men to flirt with them, but they don’t mind living in sin, at least sin according to the bible and nost churches.
 
Last edited:
I would be more interested in their husbands’ assessments of their marriages. Of course those assessments would be completely anonymous and a nice bottle of scotch would be necessary in order to ensure accuracy.
What are you going to do with the non-drinkers?
 
Why it seems like women are saying one thing and doing something else.
…or reading something else. Likewise, men say they don’t want to be shot, but then go and play Call of Duty.

What one enjoys as imaginative leisure is not necessarily what one enjoys doing personally in real life. One can, for example, enjoy dressing up as a French maid, but not actually enjoy house cleaning, or love cooking shows or home renovation shows without actually wanting to cook or do DIY…I love Fixer Upper and hate living with repairs and renovations, let alone doing it myself. Likewise, husband and I are British TV murder fans, and yet we’ve never killed anybody. I can’t speak for my husband, but I’ve never seriously even wanted to kill anybody.

And, as I was mentioning previously, the whacking is only part of the appeal of the movie version of Fifty Shades Freed–it’s got a fantastic trailer, suggesting lots of action, scenery and visual appeal. Bear in mind that the average woman (like the average man) has to deal with a lot of financial limitations and sacrifice, and there’s tremendous appeal to the idea of not having to scrimp and make do. Being a 40ish mom in the demographic of FSOG readership, this is something that I get–being a grownup and having to put yourself 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th for decades and make do with what’s left from taking care of everybody else is kind of a pain, and yes, I can see the appeal of thinking instead of the travails of a thin, virginal college student with great skin and a billionaire boyfriend who wants to lavish gifts on her and take her on great vacations. The Cinderella story aspect of FSOG is very powerful.

I think it’s revealing to imagine FSOG set it in a trailer park–do that and it immediately turns into horror.

There’s also the issue that NAWALT–all women are not reading FSOG and going to the movie. Lots of women are reading other things and watching other movies. We have an extremely fractured popular culture now, as compared to 30 years ago.

I have a very liberal, feminist email friend who loves romance novels, and I’m told that the old-school bodice rippers (which FSOG is a representative of) are really only the tip of the iceberg in the modern romance world. There are a lot of popular books that get less press that are very unlike FSOG.
 
Why it seems like women are saying one thing and doing something else.
That suggests a hive mind, as though we all think the same things. Most feminists hate the 50 Shades franchise but I’m sure some feminists enjoy poorly written books and bad movies, too. I’m a feminist and my movie choices surprise (read:disappoint) different people depending on the film. The Hunt for Red October is a solid choice though.
 
That suggests a hive mind, as though we all think the same things. Most feminists hate the 50 Shades franchise but I’m sure some feminists enjoy poorly written books and bad movies, too. I’m a feminist and my movie choices surprise (read:disappoint) different people depending on the film. The Hunt for Red October is a solid choice though.
Right.

One could make just as good a case for “All women LOVE Hallmark Christmas movies and want to live inside one” as for “All women LOVE FSOG and want to live inside FSOG.”

I only really found out about the Hallmark Christmas movie thing last Christmas season, which just goes to demonstrate the lack of a female hive mind–but it’s a HUGE phenomenon.


Based on that article, here’s what women really like (and there’s not a lot of abuse and BDSM going on–although rich is good):

–ice skating or snowball fight
–struggling non-profits
–small business
–ideally, small business connected to Christmas
–small towns
–“a solid, athletic childhood sweetheart who never left the hometown because he’s engaged in some folksy but sexy work like custom carpentry” (i.e. the opposite of Christian Grey)
–Iraq/Afghanistan military veteran
–hot young widowers
–tragic loss
–a genuine European prince (there is a for real 2017 movie called “A Christmas Prince” that was HUGE with the ladies)
–adorable children

Those Hallmark movies are every bit as much a part of the zeitgeist as FSOG (and much less awkward to watch with your mom), and it’s way easier to pull off being a Hallmark Christmas movie hero than Christian Grey.

Edited to add:

I just watched the trailer for “Christmas Prince.”


It’s like FSOG, minus BDSM and 98% of the creepiness, but you still have the Cinderella story aspect, with the addition of a seriously adorable imaginary European micro-country. But there is snow, because you can’t have a Christmas romance without snow.
 
Last edited:
The sexual liberation movement called people to have a disordered emphasis of their own sexual gratification over all else. What do you think they mean by “If it feels good, do it.” I defy you to produce any reference from Modernist sexual ethos pertaining to anything other than one’s own sexual gratification. The idea of “decency” is openly scorned. How else would it be possible to find so many stories of female adult teachers sexually abusing school aged children? This absolutely is the rotten fruit of the Modern sexual revolution.
 
I defy you to produce any reference from Modernist sexual ethos pertaining to anything other than one’s own sexual gratification
You do realize the whole consent ethos is an example of this? The whole point of “enthusiastic consent” is that you’re supposed to consider whether the other person is able to give meaningful consent and actually wants to have sex with you, not just whether you can manage to get someone else to have sex with you. It’s not all the way there, but it’s a good deal better than “find your pleasure and don’t worry about your partner.”

If we think about it, though, the rules always have to cater to the lowest common denominator. For me, a society where consent is an issue means one where my choice not to have sex outside of marriage is a least basically respected, rather than taken as an insult or a challenge. And one where I’m not expected to restrict having a normal life, because men can’t control themselves. (Keep in mind a lot of the old “ladylike” ideas really only worked if you belonged to a certain social class that could afford such things.)
 
Here’s a version of the famous tea-and-consent video:


You’ll notice that it has a lot about decency and discouraging personal gratification at the expense of others (although the video does not use those terms–it just talks about tea). I strongly suggest watching it–it’s less than 3 minutes.

There’s a very popular idea that people who aren’t Christian automatically have no morals. Paradoxically, this idea can be especially bad for Christians, because even many Christians at some point (especially when young) want to take a break from the rigors of Christian sexual morality, and it’s pretty bad when they decide that doing so earns them a hall pass from common decency.

Fun fact: there is no hall pass from common decency–ever.

Rod Dreher hates the non-Christian arguments here, but I have to say that it’s extremely valuable to have secular arguments for consent right alongside Christian arguments for chastity. There’s not necessarily a conflict, especially (as with the tea video), when it’s couched in terms of common decency and basic respect for other people.
 
The sexual liberation movement called people to have a disordered emphasis of their own sexual gratification over all else. What do you think they mean by “If it feels good, do it.” I defy you to produce any reference from Modernist sexual ethos pertaining to anything other than one’s own sexual gratification. The idea of “decency” is openly scorned. How else would it be possible to find so many stories of female adult teachers sexually abusing school aged children? This absolutely is the rotten fruit of the Modern sexual revolution.
Oh, please. Sexual immorality’s been around since the beginning of time. If you think kids didn’t get raped by their teachers or people in general didn’t screw around prior to the sexual revolution, then you’re sorely mistaken.
 
Oh, please. Sexual immorality’s been around since the beginning of time. If you think kids didn’t get raped by their teachers or people in general didn’t screw around prior to the sexual revolution, then you’re sorely mistaken.
Plus, the reason we hear about the female teacher cases is that they are getting prosecuted.
 
I read the books bc I love harming myself lol (sounds like a lie but I promise you I read it because I wanted to see why this book had a strong reaction, especially from feminists who were protesting against it) Nothing much happens in any of the books. It’s porn with fiction rather than fiction with porn.

The reason why fifty shades is so popular because it sells them the fantasy of a rich hot man who’s willing to change his whole life for a young, naive average looking introvert/virgin even though she’s not that special. Self validation. Kind of like how porn has ugly men with really hot women. A fantasy. A lot of romantic comedies like to use this formula. Throw in sex and you get a stronger response from your audience. Throw in kinky sex and you get even a stronger one (they feel safe in their imagination).

It boggles me when guys are confused and act as if women are hypocrites for saying that they don’t agree with sexual assault even though they read the books. He is definitely manipulative and messed up. But he didn’t sexually assault her or rape her. And in the moments that she really didn’t want it, she did say something/he backed off.

At least I think so. My brain blocks out trash lol. Luckily it’s so poorly written that there’s no lust at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top