Has the Old Testament Been Fabricated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Augustine3
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Augustine3

Guest
I hear it over and over again “the scriptures have been corrupted” from Muslims. I came across this website below that compares the Masoretic with the Septuagint text. You’ll find essentially these two texts are in harmony unless of course you cherry pick words or an isolated verse and ignore the content and unity of the bible.

ecmarsh.com/l…sis/gen_001.htm
 
Muslims often think that textual variants (Which exist in every copy of every handwritten text we have, including the quran) are grounds for saying it is corrupted. They are mistaken and if they are true we can throw out most of our history.
 
I find the comparison of the MT and the LXX to be quite interesting. It lets us take a look at exactly what a (single) textual revision looks like. They are almost identical, the LXX contains a few more messianic prophecies, but other than that they are substantially the same.
 
I hear it over and over again “the scriptures have been corrupted” from Muslims. I came across this website below that compares the Masoretic with the Septuagint text. You’ll find essentially these two texts are in harmony unless of course you cherry pick words or an isolated verse and ignore the content and unity of the bible.

ecmarsh.com/l…sis/gen_001.htm
Please use this link if the one above does not work.

Peace in Christ.
 
I hear it over and over again “the scriptures have been corrupted” from Muslims. I came across this website below that compares the Masoretic with the Septuagint text. You’ll find essentially these two texts are in harmony unless of course you cherry pick words or an isolated verse and ignore the content and unity of the bible.

ecmarsh.com/l…sis/gen_001.htm
Apparently the Jews copied the Old Testament directly from the Quran and changed the bits they didn’t like in order to fit their beliefs… or was it the other way round?:confused:
 
Why don’t we wait another several hundred years and then see what is said. While at the same time it might be said that World War II never really happened as we know now:rolleyes:

MJ
 
Muslims often think that textual variants (Which exist in every copy of every handwritten text we have, including the quran) are grounds for saying it is corrupted. They are mistaken and if they are true we can throw out most of our history.
There is very little that would change in terms of doctrine solely in terms of the variations in text anyway.
 
I hear it over and over again “the scriptures have been corrupted” from Muslims. I came across this website below that compares the Masoretic with the Septuagint text. You’ll find essentially these two texts are in harmony unless of course you cherry pick words or an isolated verse and ignore the content and unity of the bible.

ecmarsh.com/l…sis/gen_001.htm
The Dead Sea Scrolls likewise shed light on how well the Hebrew was preserved, and while, IIRC, the Dead Sea Scrolls don’t bear the vowel marks of the Masoretic text, they still show that the text itself was wonderfully preserved throughout the hundreds of years between the two. It likewise sheds light on how the Jews preserved their scripture and dealt with textual variants.

In regards to Islam, the “scriptures have been corrupted” is one of circular reasoning. The presupposition among Muslims is that the Quran is 100% correct and everything must be judged according to the standards of the Quran…despite the fact that the Quran is a later revelation, and such revelation should be judged in light of what came before it. That wasn’t how Christ and the apostles handled the Old Testament - you didn’t see the apostle Paul walking around and, when pressed into a corner about scripture, say, “Oh, well you guys corrupted God’s word.” Why would God change his mode of inspiration 600 years later? The simple answer is He didn’t, because the Quran didn’t come from God.

EDIT: BTW, in regards to the textual variants, you’ve probably heard Muslims go to liberal scholars to talk about hundreds of thousands of variants between New Testament manuscripts…however, if you study them, you’ll find the vast majority of them are grammatical in nature (“I’m here” versus “I am here,” etc.) and don’t change the complete context of the verse. The sad thing is that there are variations in the Quran’s manuscripts as well, but when you press a Muslim on them, they’ll say, “Yeah but those are grammatical in nature.” Truth is not built on inconsistent standards.
 
a) I find it sad that such bashing is going on, this is known as gossiping
b) The Old Testament has been admittedly edited over the years by those in charge long before Jesus, pbuh, ever came along
c) Where are the originals of the Torah or the Gospel? Where are they stored? Surely, if we are to assume that they are unedited or altered to fit a particular message we must have evidence of such in some way other than the word of a man
d) for the Qur’an discussion it is easy to say that there is no truth to the Qur’an or that it is not from God but much harder to prove this @ Byzantine_wolf

e) @ Augustine (on gawaher I was abdullahfath) hi 😃
 
I hear it over and over again “the scriptures have been corrupted” from Muslims. I came across this website below that compares the Masoretic with the Septuagint text. You’ll find essentially these two texts are in harmony unless of course you cherry pick words or an isolated verse and ignore the content and unity of the bible.

ecmarsh.com/l…sis/gen_001.htm
You’re comparing apples and oranges here. This Septuagint translation is derived from what is known as an “eclectic” text, wherein the editor picks and chooses from a number of different manuscripts to come up with one edited edition. The Masoretic text is a “diplomatic” text in that it is an edited edition based on a singular manuscript. Brenton’s underlying Greek text often attempts to harmonize to the Masoretic and thus favors readings that agree—making the two seem more in sync than they really are.

Also, the differences in Samuel and Jeremiah are pretty substantial.
 
a) I find it sad that such bashing is going on, this is known as gossiping
Who has bashed or gossiped?
b) The Old Testament has been admittedly edited over the years by those in charge long before Jesus, pbuh, ever came along
You’re presuming things you need to first demonstrate:
  1. Where has the Old Testament been edited over the years?
  2. Who are the people who are “those in charge” that you mention?
c) Where are the originals of the Torah or the Gospel? Where are they stored? Surely, if we are to assume that they are unedited or altered to fit a particular message we must have evidence of such in some way other than the word of a man
Manuscript evidence suggests there has been very little change over the years. With the New Testament for sure, there are more manuscripts available - and sourced closer to the date of the writing - than most works of antiquity. With any work of antiquity, that is how you discern the accuracy of the writing. To demand you need to see the original manuscript or you can’t trust it is presuming a standard that no one uses in the field.

I have heard Muslims likewise make this argument: that you can’t trust the Gospels because there aren’t any original manuscripts. Aside from, again, the fact that this is presuming a standard, it is likewise inconsistent - where is the original, first edition of the Quran which Mohammad held? The short answer: there is no such copy. Again, inconsistent standards.
d) for the Qur’an discussion it is easy to say that there is no truth to the Qur’an or that it is not from God but much harder to prove this @ Byzantine_wolf
Actually, it is quite easy to prove, because Mohammad claims it comes from the God of the Old Testament and the New Testament, and yet there are plenty of contradictions, both in theology and narratives, between the Quran and the Judeo-Christian scriptures. God cannot exist in a contradiction, and God, as a rational Entity, would not contradict Himself. If someone claims he speaks for God, and he teaches something entirely different than God has told His people, then he is a false prophet, and speaks not for God.
 
There has been several articles already on the ‘culling’ of the Torah as well as documentaries. This was a common practice by the scholars of the times although as most would admit most of what we now call the Bible was by word of mouth not by written word.

I can assure you as to the Qur’an comment, which seemed a bit snide and not very Christian in its bitter and border insulting tone, has already been addressed by myself in a similar thread in the other forum.

As I said in my other thread, ‘opportunity’ I am here as an opportunity for the Christians to try and show me without interference from other Muslims that Islam is wrong.

When you speak of someone who is not present to defend themselves you are essentially bashing or gossiping. Do I really need to get into etymology?

As to where it was edited therein lies the trick, we don’t know. No one does and no one likely will as the edits were made throughout time by the leaders of the Hebrew community during the time of the 2nd temple.

As to the writings you are telling me that you are holding it as unaltered because essentially, “We got some that were close to when they had the first 'un.”? That really what you are saying here? Wow!

If it was just some old book I would agree that this is efficient but as something that I am to believe as the inspired word of God I would need a little bit more assurance as to its maintained validity especially in the matter of its messages.

You will find, however, that we have some common ground in the Qur’an statement. This is an issue I have yet to get a simple concise answer on. Instead I get linked to the same book over and over.

Who said the message was wholly inconsistent? Jews say that Christianity is inconsistent with practical Judaism and that Jesus, pbuh, did not fit the mold for the messiah as he was neither the king nor was he deformed ( I am only picking out two for my point here) .

Now if we really want to talk contradictions we could talk about the use of Psalms 91 and the practicality of saying that Jesus (pbuh) died when Psalms 91 has God promising that he will protect him from all harm and grant him salvation. Or we could talk about the New Testament contradiction between the teachings of Paul and the teachings of Jesus, pbuh.

I say this in the most respectful way but thus far your response seems rushed. Take some time, think things out. I can give you some websites if you want to give you some of the general ideas regarding Old Testament as it concerns Islamic views so that we don’t waste unnecessary time going over old debates
 
vskipper;

While I’m aware of arguments made elsewhere, for the topic of discussion in this thread, it would help if arguments were either remade or a link was provided to where those discussions were held, so that people reading this thread could go and look at that for edification on the subject. Simply saying “I said this elsewhere” or “People talked about this before” does not help anyone, and is said as if to suggest the discussion has already been resolved.

In like manner, if you are going to make accusations and statements like Jesus and Paul contradicted each other (which they most certainly did not), be prepared to demonstrate it. However, since you seem to think the position of Christianity stands on brittle glass, please permit me to present a demonstration of some of the contradictions between the Quran and the Bible:

Who named the animals?

Out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name. [Genesis 2:19]

And He taught Adam the names of all things… [S. 2:31]

Did all of Noah’s family survive the flood?

Then the LORD said to Noah, "Enter the ark, you and all your household, for you alone I have seen to be righteous before Me in this time”…Then Noah and his sons and his wife and his sons’ wives with him entered the ark because of the water of the flood…and only Noah was left, together with those that were with him in the ark. [Genesis 7:1, 7, 23]

So the Ark floated with them on the waves (towering) like mountains, and Noah called out to his son, who had separated himself (from the rest): “O my son! embark with us, and be not with the unbelievers!” The son replied: “I will betake myself to some mountain: it will save me from the water.” Noah said: “This day nothing can save, from the command of Allah, any but those on whom He hath mercy!” And the waves came between them, and the son was among those overwhelmed in the Flood. [S. 11:42-43]

Who wrote the Psalms?

Many of the psalms, such as Psalm 72, were written by Solomon, while others, such as Psalm 46-49 and 84-85 and 87-88, were written by the sons of Korah, and others, such as Psalm 50 and 73 and 75-83, were written by Asaph.

We have sent thee inspiration, as We sent it to Noah and the Messengers after him: we sent inspiration to Abraham, Isma’il, Isaac, Jacob and the Tribes, to Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and solomon, and to David We gave the Psalms. [S. 4:163]

Where was Jesus born?

And she gave birth to her firstborn son; and she wrapped Him in cloths, and laid Him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn. [Luke 2:7]

And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a palm-tree… [S. 19:23]

Did Jesus die on the cross?

And Jesus cried out again with a loud voice, and yielded up His spirit. [Matt 27:50]
And Jesus cried out with a loud voice, and breathed His last. [Mark 15:37]
…Having said this, He breathed His last. [Luke 23:46]
…And bowing His head, He gave up His spirit. [John 19:30]

That they said (in boast), “We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah”;- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not [S. 4:157]

I have more I can provide, but I present this as a sampling. This does not cover what was brought up earlier, which was that the Quran presents contradictory theology as well in regards to Christian understanding of Christ, God, etc. You might again argue, “Some Jews say there’s contradictions between the Old and New Testament!” That may be, and that’s a discussion worthy of another thread (like this one, where it’s discussed), but right now we’re talking about the Quran in relationship to the previous revelations. Again, the apostles didn’t go around arguing with Jews and accusing them of taking out verses or corrupting their scripture to take out anything about Jesus - they argued from the previous revelations. We don’t see this with the Quran - the Quran is presumed to be the standard by which we are to use. Why would God change His strategy? Why should we simply believe, at face value, the Quran comes from God? Again, that has to be established before that is believed.

Now in regards to your comment here:
As to the writings you are telling me that you are holding it as unaltered because essentially, “We got some that were close to when they had the first 'un.”? That really what you are saying here? Wow!
Sarcasm is not an argument and helps no one. In any case, what I was saying was that we have more manuscripts (over 5500) for the New Testament than any other work of antiquity, with more manuscripts closer to the original dating of the authors than any other work of antiquity. We can say with greater confidence what the Gospel of John originally said than we can with Caesar’s Gallic Wars or Plato’s Republic. According to the standard of textual criticism, you would have to be intellectually honest and say that we likewise have no idea what Caesar wrote, nor what Plato wrote.

I then compared that to the Quran, because you had asked where the original manuscript of the Torah and Gospel were. Can you tell me where, in the world, I can find the location of the original copy of the Quran, as Mohammad held it in his hands and showed to people while he was still alive. Can you provide me such a copy? If you cannot, can you then, consistently, say that there’s a possibility the Quran was corrupted? If not, then we have a case of a double standard, and double standards are a sign of something which is not grounded on truth.
 
It was burned, in order that no copy have more legitimacy that the one officially compiled by the new authorities as the correct one.
I was aware of that. 😛 My point in the question was to make one think about the Muslim contention that we can’t trust the Torah or the Gospel because we have no originals. If Muslims were consistent with that argument, they’d have to admit that we couldn’t trust the Quran either.
 
I was aware of that. 😛 My point in the question was to make one think about the Muslim contention that we can’t trust the Torah or the Gospel because we have no originals. If Muslims were consistent with that argument, they’d have to admit that we couldn’t trust the Quran either.
👍

That is applying the same standard to the Quran as they would to the Bible.
 
Speaking of double standards, I think this is an excellent video posted by ComeHome2Rome in dealing with textual variations.
ComeHome2Rome said:
youtube.com/watch?v=z8RJaJbKog4&feature=youtube_gdata_player

This is a link to a short video re: the most ancient Arabic Quran in existence today. It was discovered in the 1970s and has been dated based on the art back to a very small window of time- between 705 & 715 ad. The are varing texts written over texts.
 
That the Quran would have textual variants would not immediately denote we don’t know what the Quran said. That’s just a fact with any ancient text of work. The problem is that Muslims today want to act as if there was never any problem with what the manuscripts say, and that there has been a perfect copy of the Quran throughout history.

In another conversation I had with a Muslim here on CAF, he was claiming that the textual variants in the NT manuscripts was a sign you couldn’t follow it. I pointed out that most of those are grammatical, but he maintained it was still proof. When I pointed out there are textual variants seen in the Quran and even cited some Muslim sources to that effect, his immediate response was, “Yeah, but those are grammatical variants.”

I would almost laugh, but willful ignorance is never humorous. 😦
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top