Hi, FaithG,
This is Part 2 of 2
Now, it is about here that things got a bit muddled for me in your post. St. Paul uses the expression of hanging Christ on a tree (Acts 10:39) as another way of describing the cross - but, you will need to give me a reference on just where the cross was seen as anything but an ingnoble death. The Romans were quite skilled (admittedly cross building does not really capture the depth of the engineering or architectural skills) at getting a message over. Hundreds of people crucified (the name itself identifies a cross) as part of mass executions drove home the point that certain behavior was not favorably considered by the Emperor.
Remember, when you say that the Catholic church will never change, that the church is by definition, a
body of people, first and foremost. Cultures change. And the Catholic doctrine of continual revelation fosters more change.
OK, your on, FaithG, in 2000 there has been an abundance of time for doctrine to change. Prove your statement. And by ‘change’ is meant going from ‘a’ to ‘non-a’ or "We taught this as a matter of Faith, but now we are teaching something different’ You idea that things added represent change does not square with what Christ told us when He said “I have much more to tell you but you can not bear it now.” (John 16:12). Here are three examples of where your statement falls short: The Catholic Church for 2000 years has always taught that
1.) Baptism is necessary for salvation.
2.) The Consecrated Bread and Wine is the Body, Blood, Human Soul and Divinity of Christ
3.) That Christ gave His Apostles the delegated Power of God to forgive sin.
**
The question of whether the original church was Catholic is skewed, because although the lineage
is intact and unbroken, (yes, I’m agreeing there), the habits and customs have been perpetually adapting, changing, and conforming. I am not complaining, I believe this is a good thing, and I do believe in God’s ability to give true visions to saints and such. But a splendid example is the belief in Mary’s immaculate conception. This can be directly traced to a specific date as being condoned in church doctrine… it did not exist before. It is very akin to the argument of whether Rome was the same nation after its government shifted form. Many say yes, and many say no. It’s all a point of view. Yes, the Catholic church
is the same governmental structure (massively expanded) that began with the apostles, unbroken. No, the church is nothing like it’s original embryonic form. Reformers try to take the system back to that earlier form, and they don’t always succeed – and no one can really say whether the original is always better because it is closer to the source, or whether the new structure improves through growth.
While this is true for strictly human institutions, for the Church founded by Christ on Peter, this is not really how things go with regard to the teaching doctrine. For example, just because Peter did not use the internet does not mean that his successor, Benedict XVI can not use it! Some things obviously do change - but, these are incidentals. The heart of the Catholic Church is that it is the Bride of Christ and as such is to live a life holy and pleasing to Christ. History is full of examples where this ideal was not met - to put it mildly - but, if we were talking about a strictly human organization, it would have crashed and burned about 2000 years ago when the 1st crisis in the Church took place as recorded in Acts 15.
I admire most those people who lift themselves beyond doctrinal squabbles, which some might consider rather petty, to address those major moral difficulties, which, through their threat, unite the morally conscious. Poverty. Abortion. Murder. War. Theft. Rape. Younameit, there’s plenty to keep everyone busy. Mother Theresa herself has been quoted as saying that she wanted to help Christians be better Christians, Jews be better Jews, Muslims be better Muslims… Isn’t that altruism at its highest form?
No doubt about it,FaithG, Mother Theresa was an inspiration to everyone!
God bless
FaithG;6931281: