Have you explored other religions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HauntedJame
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi all,

I am new here and this is my first post.

I was raised Catholic, then went with my dad a few times to Lutheran Evangelical services and to Serbian Orthdox masses. He wanted to show me that there are also other Christians and that we all believe in the same god.

I am a Baptist now, or better said a Christian. Because I finally came to the conclusion that we are all Bothers and Sisters in Christ Jesus, no matter which Christian Church we belong to!) Well, actually, I was quite near to become a Mormon.

Since then I am happy where I am and can’t imagine being somewhere else!

In Christ,
Antionach
Antionach, welcome my brother to the forum! You could not have said it better. We all believe in the same God. There’s only one. 😉 And you conclude correctly. We Christians are all brothers and sisters in Christ. We are united in Him. Christ is far greater than any differences which might divide us. Continued peace to you. God bless!
 
Hi all! I am just curious if anyone here were from a different religious background than Catholic, or have explored other faiths. Just…well, I am always the curious cat, aren’t I?

I have to admit, I was raised Catholic then moved away from it. I was a Lutheran for awhile but I missed the “glitz and glamor” as my dad calls it, of the Catholic Church. I tried to get into Wiccan but realised it was too complicated and expensive. So now I am drifting, and I supposeI wonder what other people have experienced.
*When you hit target…

Why are you drifting? Drifters gather no moss!!! Why don’t you explore the Catholic Church instead? I left for 27 years before I returned and I tell you, the Catholic Church is exciting, the truth is exciting. It is not cushy. The Church is challenging. The more you explore, the more you learn, the more you benefit and the happier you become.

God bless you
Cinette:)*
 
I was raised Catholic. I suffered a spiritual crisis from-of al the ridiculous things!-thinking Mass is boring. I never left the faith, but I came close.

I still think Mass is boring,*
If the Mass is boring then:
God is boring
The scriptures are boring
Praying is boring


Do you realise what you are saying???* but I now understand the tremendous significance and importance of it. No longer would it be a reason to leave the faith!*Welcome to the “boring Church”

Were you looking for entertainment?*

I investigated Zen Buddhism for a bit. I still admire much of the philosophy (only the stuff compatible with Church teaching, of course), but only thought of it as a philosophy rather than a religion. I nearly became atheist, but I was pulled from that brink by an excellent theology teacher.

I almost became Presbyterian then. You know what saved me? A website called fallible blogma, run by Matthew Warner. I highly reccomend it.*What is the link?

Blessings
Cinette:)*
 
Yes.

I was raised Catholic, and looked into Judaism as well. I couldn’t get over the fact that Jesus was the Son of God, so I looked for and participated in several protestant religions. I still have enormous respect for both Judaism (our older brothers in faith, like JP The Great said) and Protestants (our brothers in Christ).

I still go through personal phases of doubt in belief-it’s pretty common, actually. Most believers will admit going through the famous, “nights of doubt”. But the diety of Christ is still very, very hard to disprove.
*Have you tried studying the Catholic Faith?

Blessings
Cinette:)*
 
Well I don’t assume the degree of faithfulness the poster has. But for starters maybe because the Church says :bigyikes: he/she is. I’m certain you follow that teaching too though CW. Or maybe “Dont know” because he/she truly doesn’t know, remains so as not to fall under the judgment of “could not be saved”. (CCC 846) 🤷
This…

I will not judge anyone based on their Faith beliefs and I’d expect not to be judged likewise. 🤷
 
Hi all! I am just curious if anyone here were from a different religious background than Catholic, or have explored other faiths. Just…well, I am always the curious cat, aren’t I?

I have to admit, I was raised Catholic then moved away from it. I was a Lutheran for awhile but I missed the “glitz and glamor” as my dad calls it, of the Catholic Church. I tried to get into Wiccan but realised it was too complicated and expensive. So now I am drifting, and I supposeI wonder what other people have experienced.
You remind me of a prodigal son who had everything within his grasp, yet he wanted to venture in the wide world and hence took his wealth and squandered everything, until even his friends left him, and his only way back to life was to turn back even as a servant in his fathers house. I hope you are like that prodigal son and returns back with no shame but full faith. Do it soon as life in this world is short.

God Bless you.
 
Hi, Dontknow,

You certainly have a curious position for one who claims to be a Catholic.
I tend to agree with this. I find it hard to believe everyone else within the different Christian Based Faiths are wrong and only we as Catholics are correct.

Sorry - I just can’t get myself to believe that. As you say - we’ll all eventually find out.
Sorry, to hear that - it sounds like you are no longer a member of the Catholic Church! And, yes, I am serious. Ultimately we all will be judged on how we respond to Faith God has given to us (for some interesting reading, try the 25th Chapter of Matthew’s Gospel).

Let me demonstrate how this plays out in the ‘real’ world…

You either BELIEVE that Christ is the Son of God - or you don’t

You either BELIEVE that Christ has the Power and Authority of God - or you don’t

You either BELIEVE that Christ founded His Church on Peter (Matt 16:18) - or you don’t

You either BELIEVE that Christ’s Holy Spirit gave His Power to the Catholic Church as recorded in Acts 2 - or you don’t

You either BELIEVE that Christ’s Church (and, that would be the Catholic Church) is One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic - or you don’t - and finally…

You either BELIEVE that Christ can neither deceive or be deceived and in setting up the Catholic Church as He did He has established The Way you are to come to Him - or you don’t

… and if ther is anything here listed that you do not believe … you are not a Catholic and will need to find some place that you can believe in - and have a really good story prepared for when you meet Christ as ***your ***Divine Judge to say why you did not believe what He has said.

Honest, that is the way it is going down - and, you can BELIEVE that! 👍

God bless
 
Hi, Jim Dandy,

I have to hand it to you, JD, this shows a clarity of insight that just defies description! 😃

But, you know, you just can’t get away with making unfounded or unsubstantiated statements without getting your hand called on it! So, put some facts where your mouth is: reference where Jesus did not tell us the truth while He was on earth.

And, yes, having credible sources is important … 👍

God bless
Papa Benedict lamented that relativism is rampant. And he is right. Jesus didn’t tell us the truth when he came to earth the first time, but he’ll tell us later? Hmmm.

Peace, Jim Dandy
 
Hi, Rascalking,

I am sorry … I guess I just do not understand what it is you are saying here … so, please give me a hand here… 🙂
Yes.

I was raised Catholic, and looked into Judaism as well. I couldn’t get over the fact that Jesus was the Son of God, so I looked for and participated in several protestant religions.

This presents a major issue of confusion for me … just what part of a FACT is it that you “…couldn’t get over …”? It is a FACT that water boils at 212F at sea level - every time. Now, 211F is just very hot water - but, that extra degree puts it over the top…! Christ performed signs and miracles that no one has ever done before - although many have tried to do them or actually disprove what was done - and all have failed. And, that too is a FACT.

And, that leads to the next understanding problem I have - just what Protestant religion have you looked at that does not believe Christ is God (Mormon? JW? ) All the ones I know about all believe Christ is God.

I still have enormous respect for both Judaism (our older brothers in faith, like JP The Great said) and Protestants (our brothers in Christ).

Disrespecting other religions is not requried to believe that the Catholic Church is the True Chruch founded by Christ on Peter (Matt 16:18). Loving others is what Christ wants us to do - and part of that love is to show others the True Path to Christ through the Chruch He founded on Peter. The ball is in your court - what you do with the Bible you hold in your hand is up to you - but, the FACTS are all there.

I still go through personal phases of doubt in belief-it’s pretty common, actually. Most believers will admit going through the famous, “nights of doubt”. But the diety of Christ is still very, very hard to disprove.
“Disproving the Diety of Christ” is an issue you ar working on? Maybe you need some more FACTS to work with? What specifically are you having trouble with?

God bless
 
Hi, Marc Anthony,

Just to let you know that I had some problems understanding a couple of items in your post - and I would appreciate some clarification… 🙂
I was raised Catholic.

This to me is the pivotal item in the entire post! 👍 But, really this could anywhere from Baptized a Catholic and nothing else happened to Born into a Catholic family, Baptized and catechized Catholic and graduated from a Catholic High School and College!! 😃 So, where is it that you would place yourself on this line?

I suffered a spiritual crisis from-of al the ridiculous things!-thinking Mass is boring. I never left the faith, but I came close.

That is one of the definitions of a real cirisis - you meet a fork in the road and you must choose one path or the other - you are never the same. There is an interestng poem by Robert Frost I would like ot share with you: poemhunter.com/poem/the-road-not-taken/

You know, it souds like you have been living the ‘moth tothe flame’ type exerience(s) with your faith. By the time the moth realizes that the flame’s promise of light was just a lot of hot air… the moth is consumed in the flame. Now, as a group, most folks do not get serious about actively spending their time learning more about your Cahtolic Faith - until, at least for some - they realize that other faiths, just like the light cast by the flame, do not the sureness given by the Son of God when He founded His Church (and, that would be the Catholic Faith) on Peter (Matt 16:18).

I still think Mass is boring, but I now understand the tremendous significance and importance of it. No longer would it be a reason to leave the faith!

I investigated Zen Buddhism for a bit. I still admire much of the philosophy (only the stuff compatible with Church teaching, of course), but only thought of it as a philosophy rather than a religion. I nearly became atheist, but I was pulled from that brink by an excellent theology teacher.

I almost became Presbyterian then. You know what saved me? A website called fallible blogma, run by Matthew Warner. I highly reccomend it.
Presbyterian, eh? The idea that Scripture was supreme (and the NT did not really take the form we know it as until 400AD) and it was the Catholic Church that actually gave it to the world) never made much sense to me… :rolleyes: I think anyone really believing in the Love of God will get the chills with Calvin’s view of predestination and how God really operates! :eek:

In any event - you being on CAF is a good move. You will learn a lot about the Catholic Faith!

Keep up the good work!

God bless
 
Hi, Dontknow,

it sounds like you are no longer a member of the Catholic Church!
You either BELIEVE that Christ is the Son of God - or you don’t

You either BELIEVE that Christ has the Power and Authority of God - or you don’t

You either BELIEVE that Christ founded His Church on Peter (Matt 16:18) - or you don’t

You either BELIEVE that Christ’s Holy Spirit gave His Power to the Catholic Church as recorded in Acts 2 - or you don’t

You either BELIEVE that Christ’s Church (and, that would be the Catholic Church) is One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic - or you don’t - and finally…

You either BELIEVE that Christ can neither deceive or be deceived and in setting up the Catholic Church as He did He has established The Way you are to come to Him - or you don’t

… and if ther is anything here listed that you do not believe … you are not a Catholic

:yawn: It doesn’t sound like that all.

And you either believe in whom the Catholic Church defines as a Catholic or you don’t.

But if you believe in all those things listed then I have no doubt you believe the poster is a Catholic. 🤷
 
Hi, Jim Dandy,

I have to hand it to you, JD, this shows a clarity of insight that just defies description! 😃

But, you know, you just can’t get away with making unfounded or unsubstantiated statements without getting your hand called on it! So, put some facts where your mouth is: reference where Jesus did not tell us the truth while He was on earth.

And, yes, having credible sources is important … 👍

God bless
:confused: What good is that going to do to actually prove anything? It will still be a matter of faith. Then you’ll have the question of whose interpretation of the words one believes and one’s definition of credible. 🤷 It would be a lot better if you just finally accepted you walk by faith.

God bless you on your faith journey. And peace.
 
Hi, Dontknow,

You certainly have a curious position for one who claims to be a Catholic.

Sorry, to hear that - it sounds like you are no longer a member of the Catholic Church! And, yes, I am serious. Ultimately we all will be judged on how we respond to Faith God has given to us (for some interesting reading, try the 25th Chapter of Matthew’s Gospel).

Let me demonstrate how this plays out in the ‘real’ world…

You either BELIEVE that Christ is the Son of God - or you don’t

You either BELIEVE that Christ has the Power and Authority of God - or you don’t

You either BELIEVE that Christ founded His Church on Peter (Matt 16:18) - or you don’t

You either BELIEVE that Christ’s Holy Spirit gave His Power to the Catholic Church as recorded in Acts 2 - or you don’t

You either BELIEVE that Christ’s Church (and, that would be the Catholic Church) is One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic - or you don’t - and finally…

You either BELIEVE that Christ can neither deceive or be deceived and in setting up the Catholic Church as He did He has established The Way you are to come to Him - or you don’t

… and if ther is anything here listed that you do not believe … you are not a Catholic and will need to find some place that you can believe in - and have a really good story prepared for when you meet Christ as ***your ***Divine Judge to say why you did not believe what He has said.

Honest, that is the way it is going down - and, you can BELIEVE that! 👍

God bless
If it would make it better for you than just ignore that piece of my profile then. You can define me anyway you’d prefer I guess - really has no impact on me.

I find it impossible to call everyone else’s Christian based Faith wrong and ours the only one that is correct - sorry.
 
Hi, Dontknow,

It really isn’t a case of making anything easier for me - I just read what was posted. Your name choice and religious identification stand in stark contrast to one another - at least in my opinion.

Now, if you don’t think Christ knew what he was talking about - that He is God and really did found a Chruch - this is your issue and not mine - I’ve done all I can do… and that includes adding you to my prayer list. 🙂 But, the resolutions to your doubts are given to you in the teachings of the Catholic Church and the Bible whose canon it approved in about 400AD. There is no reason to continue with doubt in a area that can only be resolved with enlighted Faith - and this is the Grace of God.

But, don’t wait for a bolt like St. Paul got on the road to Damascus. God has given us ordinary means to come to Him - and His Church (and, that would be the Catholic Church) stands as a guiding light to those who are in darkness.

The insistance to persist in doubt will continue to only cause more problems - at least as I see it.

God bless
If it would make it better for you than just ignore that piece of my profile then. You can define me anyway you’d prefer I guess - really has no impact on me.

I find it impossible to call everyone else’s Christian based Faith wrong and ours the only one that is correct - sorry.
 
Doesn’t anyone else here just get worn to the bone listening to people argue the same points over and over? Let’s just face the fact that people have different belief systems, and we don’t have to convince everyone that our own way is right. To consider yourself right and everyone else wrong is exceedingly narrowminded – and besides, you’re not going to win converts that way anyhow!

I may remind our dogmatic Catholic brothers that the Catholic church itself says, in the catechism, that the church must be “all things to all people”. Catholic tradition is supposed to adapt to the native culture of an area as much as feasibly possible without adulterating core principles. (Yes, I have read the catechism, even though I’m not Catholic. I enjoy exploring other points of view, but even though I probably agree with 80-90% of it, that last 10% keeps me where I am.)

It was this philosophy that prompted Paul to discard the mandatory practices of Jewish diet and circumcision. It was this same idea that prompted Christmas: experts argue which pagan religion spawned the composite traditions. One of the church’s most esteemed evangelists travelled amongst pagan tribes, preaching that the One God was, in fact, hidden in their own religions as the “nameless god”. The cross was a revered religious symbol well before Christianity, and besides, Jesus wasn’t hung on a cross, he was hung on a tree. A highly educated Catholic priest of my acquaintance was discussing with me the Greek and Hebrew vocabulary origins of our concepts of Hell: it is a cross of Greek pagan Hades, the Jewish word for “burn pit” (where trash was dumped – thus the writhing worms), and “graveyard”; and our visual pictures of Satan have encompassed facets of the Jewish word simply meaning “adversary”, with the Jewish god of the dead. (The Jews for a time worshipped a separate god for the dead, which was what made Jesus so revolutionary preaching that God is above the living andthe dead.)

Remember, when you say that the Catholic church will never change, that the church is by definition, a body of people, first and foremost. Cultures change. And the Catholic doctrine of continual revelation fosters more change. The question of whether the original church was Catholic is skewed, because although the lineage is*** intact and unbroken, (yes, I’m agreeing there), the habits and customs have been perpetually adapting, changing, and conforming. I am not complaining, I believe this is a good thing, and I do believe in God’s ability to give true visions to saints and such. But a splendid example is the belief in Mary’s immaculate conception. This can be directly traced to a specific date as being condoned in church doctrine… it did not exist before. It is very akin to the argument of whether Rome was the same nation after its government shifted form. Many say yes, and many say no. It’s all a point of view. Yes, the Catholic church is the same governmental structure (massively expanded) that began with the apostles, unbroken. No, the church is nothing like it’s original embryonic form. Reformers try to take the system back to that earlier form, and they don’t always succeed – and no one can really say whether the original is always better because it is closer to the source, or whether the new structure improves through growth.

I admire most those people who lift themselves beyond doctrinal squabbles, which some might consider rather petty, to address those major moral difficulties, which, through their threat, unite the morally conscious. Poverty. Abortion. Murder. War. Theft. Rape. Younameit, there’s plenty to keep everyone busy. Mother Theresa herself has been quoted as saying that she wanted to help Christians be better Christians, Jews be better Jews, Muslims be better Muslims… Isn’t that altruism at its highest form?*
 
Hi, FaithG,

This is an interesting point of view … let me share mine with you…Ah, this took longer than I thought … so, this is Part 1 of 2
Doesn’t anyone else here just get worn to the bone listening to people argue the same points over and over? Let’s just face the fact that people have different belief systems, and we don’t have to convince everyone that our own way is right. To consider yourself right and everyone else wrong is exceedingly narrowminded – and besides, you’re not going to win converts that way anyhow!

You know, FaithG, if we were talking about the Big Bang Theory so speculating about the inner workings of a Black Hole, I would certainly agree with you. Come up with a theory you like and start developing some experimental models that try and replicate what it is we know for real… and see what you get! 👍 But at the risk of repeating myself, either you believe Christ is God, or you don’t … either you believe Christ knew what He was doing when He founded His Church (and, yes, that would be the Catholic Church) on Peter (Matt 16:18) or, you don’t… you believe that you will be judged one day for all of your willful conduct in how you responded to the Grace of God (Matt 25), or you don’t. If you don’t … well… I think you being on this list says something about just how comfortable you feel about this topic.

I may remind our dogmatic Catholic brothers that the Catholic church itself says, in the catechism, that the church must be “all things to all people”. Catholic tradition is supposed to adapt to the native culture of an area as much as feasibly possible without adulterating core principles. (Yes, I have read the catechism, even though I’m not Catholic. I enjoy exploring other points of view, but even though I probably agree with 80-90% of it, that last 10% keeps me where I am.)

It is always good to find well read individuals on the list. You may want to go a bit easy on this view adaptation to the native culture ethic - it can easily get out of hand (by the way, can you spot me a reference here on that, thanks!) The Prince of this world is fighting aginst God and His people and has already been condmned. Let me recommend three sections in St. John’s Gospel which may shed some light on the limits of ‘adaptation’ that may be simply camouflaged ‘surrender’: John 12:31, John 14:30, and John 16:11.

Since you claim to be somewhere - all that was listed was ‘uncommitted’ I would be interested in knowing your criteria for the remaining 10%? It could be you have overlooked it… 😃

It was this philosophy that prompted Paul to discard the mandatory practices of Jewish diet and circumcision. It was this same idea that prompted Christmas: experts argue which pagan religion spawned the composite traditions. One of the church’s most esteemed evangelists travelled amongst pagan tribes, preaching that the One God was, in fact, hidden in their own religions as the “nameless god”. The cross was a revered religious symbol well before Christianity, and besides, Jesus wasn’t hung on a cross, he was hung on a tree. A highly educated Catholic priest of my acquaintance was discussing with me the Greek and Hebrew vocabulary origins of our concepts of Hell: it is a cross of Greek pagan Hades, the Jewish word for “burn pit” (where trash was dumped – thus the writhing worms), and “graveyard”; and our visual pictures of Satan have encompassed facets of the Jewish word simply meaning “adversary”, with the Jewish god of the dead. (The Jews for a time worshipped a separate god for the dead, which was what made Jesus so revolutionary preaching that God is above the living andthe dead.)

Wow! FaithG, this is quite a jumble you have run together in one paragraph. Since you appear to be an admirer of St. Paul (he appears in several of your sentences… let me see if I can give you an idea or two on him. It wasn’t the ‘philosophy’ that caused Paul to change from being a highly observant Jewish Pharisee - it was the direct appearance of the Risen Christ to Paul on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:1-31). I think your reference to the esteemed evangelist was St. Paul and you can find this account in Acts 17 when he is traveling in Athens. This is an interesting story because the Greeks were a very religious people - they knew all of these forces in nature were not their making - so they knew superior beings responsible for the natural world. Polytheism is the best they could come up with - which considering atheists today, that is not such a bad move, eh?

God bless - CONTINUED -

**
 
Hi, FaithG,

This is Part 2 of 2

Now, it is about here that things got a bit muddled for me in your post. St. Paul uses the expression of hanging Christ on a tree (Acts 10:39) as another way of describing the cross - but, you will need to give me a reference on just where the cross was seen as anything but an ingnoble death. The Romans were quite skilled (admittedly cross building does not really capture the depth of the engineering or architectural skills) at getting a message over. Hundreds of people crucified (the name itself identifies a cross) as part of mass executions drove home the point that certain behavior was not favorably considered by the Emperor.

Remember, when you say that the Catholic church will never change, that the church is by definition, a body of people, first and foremost. Cultures change. And the Catholic doctrine of continual revelation fosters more change.

OK, your on, FaithG, in 2000 there has been an abundance of time for doctrine to change. Prove your statement. And by ‘change’ is meant going from ‘a’ to ‘non-a’ or "We taught this as a matter of Faith, but now we are teaching something different’ You idea that things added represent change does not square with what Christ told us when He said “I have much more to tell you but you can not bear it now.” (John 16:12). Here are three examples of where your statement falls short: The Catholic Church for 2000 years has always taught that

1.) Baptism is necessary for salvation.

2.) The Consecrated Bread and Wine is the Body, Blood, Human Soul and Divinity of Christ

3.) That Christ gave His Apostles the delegated Power of God to forgive sin.
**

The question of whether the original church was Catholic is skewed, because although the lineage is intact and unbroken, (yes, I’m agreeing there), the habits and customs have been perpetually adapting, changing, and conforming. I am not complaining, I believe this is a good thing, and I do believe in God’s ability to give true visions to saints and such. But a splendid example is the belief in Mary’s immaculate conception. This can be directly traced to a specific date as being condoned in church doctrine… it did not exist before. It is very akin to the argument of whether Rome was the same nation after its government shifted form. Many say yes, and many say no. It’s all a point of view. Yes, the Catholic church is the same governmental structure (massively expanded) that began with the apostles, unbroken. No, the church is nothing like it’s original embryonic form. Reformers try to take the system back to that earlier form, and they don’t always succeed – and no one can really say whether the original is always better because it is closer to the source, or whether the new structure improves through growth.

While this is true for strictly human institutions, for the Church founded by Christ on Peter, this is not really how things go with regard to the teaching doctrine. For example, just because Peter did not use the internet does not mean that his successor, Benedict XVI can not use it! Some things obviously do change - but, these are incidentals. The heart of the Catholic Church is that it is the Bride of Christ and as such is to live a life holy and pleasing to Christ. History is full of examples where this ideal was not met - to put it mildly - but, if we were talking about a strictly human organization, it would have crashed and burned about 2000 years ago when the 1st crisis in the Church took place as recorded in Acts 15.

I admire most those people who lift themselves beyond doctrinal squabbles, which some might consider rather petty, to address those major moral difficulties, which, through their threat, unite the morally conscious. Poverty. Abortion. Murder. War. Theft. Rape. Younameit, there’s plenty to keep everyone busy. Mother Theresa herself has been quoted as saying that she wanted to help Christians be better Christians, Jews be better Jews, Muslims be better Muslims… Isn’t that altruism at its highest form?

No doubt about it,FaithG, Mother Theresa was an inspiration to everyone!

God bless
FaithG;6931281:
God bless - CONTINUED -
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top