A
aimee
Guest
I always receive on tongue …never had any problem…
(Mexico is one of those, so if you go to a Mass in Mexico, the priest may certainly refuse to give you Communion in the Hand)QUOTE]
How would one know if they are in a new parish where you were only allowed to receive on the tongue? Would you watch what the others were doing? I think maybe the church should make it universal that either it is allowed by both methods or restrict it to on the tongue only. That might solve some of the problems…
I receive by hand only mainly because the last time I received on the tongue the EMHC almost shoved it down my throat. Well…almost
:heart:Blyss
Are you saying that to receive communion only once a month because you do not want to receive in the hand during the other Masses?After I started going to the monthly Classical Latin Mass in my city I decided to only recieve on the tongue, from the priest. When I went for Communion in my parish I opened my mouth and Father (who knows me) gave me an odd stare and a blessing instead. After Mass I went to him to ask why and I was told that he only gives Communion on the tongue to the old folks who wont have it any other way and that I, as a young man, should recieve like most other people.
So now I only recieve at the TLM.
Yes. If I think that recieving on the tongue, from a priest, is far more reverant and traditional why would I go and touch the host with my hands? What if I let particles drop to the floor?Are you saying that to receive communion only once a month because you do not want to receive in the hand during the other Masses?
Thanks for the honest answer. I am not trying to criticize you. I am just trying to see where any individual draws the line. My personal take is the following: receiving in the hands is not implicitly irreverent (the Church would not allow it). Receiving on the tongue is much more reverent and it is my preferred method. Now I have to strike a balance between being reverent, being too scrupulous, and receiving or not the graces that I need in my life. Everybody has a different threshold based and scrupulosity and intentions. In my case I will receive in the hands if it were the only way and I can do it in what to me is still a reverent manner. On the other side I would first fight hard for the privilege of receiving on the tongue.Yes. If I think that recieving on the tongue, from a priest, is far more reverant and traditional why would I go and touch the host with my hands? What if I let particles drop to the floor?
No, it is better to recieve once a month and be reverant then every Sunday in an irreverant manner.
I don’t know about Mexico, but when I used to travel to Puerto Rico the priest at the church I attended would announce it at each English speaking Mass (don’t know about the Spanish ones, since I didn’t attend them) that, in that Diocese they did not give Holy Communion in the hand.How would one know if they are in a new parish where you were only allowed to receive on the tongue? Would you watch what the others were doing? I think maybe the church should make it universal that either it is allowed by both methods or restrict it to on the tongue only. That might solve some of the problems…
I receive by hand only mainly because the last time I received on the tongue the EMHC almost shoved it down my throat. Well…almost
:heart:Blyss
i haven’t had a problem with priest refusing to give me Communion on tongue but he definitely gave me what for about it in other “subtle” ways. Like one time after daily Mass, where i was probably the only one to receive that way, he made a big thing about it, saying to the congregation that if we are going to receive that way to stick out our tongue. I thought it was gross the way he put it. He is not an orthodox priest in this & other ways & i don’t go to his Church anymore. I have had other priests do “subtle” things to discourage this, yet it is the proper way to receive…In another thread a Poster said:
“I have received both on the tongue and in the hand, and I have experienced so many problems with EMsHC being unwilling to put the host on my tongue that I went back to in the hand.”
I have only run into this once, is this a common problem?
Receiving on the tongue is the NORM after Vatican II, but many priests educated in the 70’s and 80’s don’t seem to know this. I’ve heard a priest tell his congregation that the Church no longer allows communion on the tongue (he also told them that nobody prays the rosary anymore, that everyone goes to heaven, and that God is our mother). You might consider having a friendly chat with your bishop about your pastor’s uncharitable and inaccurate comments.I was then told that perhaps I needed to find another church, one more in line with Pre Vatican II thinking and customs.
So yeah, you could say I’ve definitely had problems with the receiving on the tongue.
Good Tip!For people who have had purely logistical or accidental (not EMHC trying to send a message) difficulties, I always think a good thing to do is to stand in front of a mirror at home & open your mouth as you would normally do to receive holy communion.
Just double-check yourself to see if your mouth is open as wide as you think it is; it might not be, in which case, when you are in the communion line, try to remember to open a bit wider, with your tongue extended.
Good Tip!
I am going to guess you are a EMHC!
This is not sarcasm, I do think you are right.
God Bless,