Have you read the Book of Mormon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pieman333272
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why? It’s a book…do I believe it? Do I believe it’s only a book? Yes. Do I believe it is historically accurate and that I believe Jews came to the Americas? No. Do I believe it has wisdom contained in it’s pages…Yes. Do I believe it was “brought forth by the hand and power of God.”…No.

It may surprise you to also know…I read the Science and Health as well…and Thomas A Kempis “imitation of Christ”…I have a wonderful translation of the Tao Te Ching by Stephen Mitchell I have sitting with my Bible…I also have a nice English copy of the Holy Qu’ran.

I enjoy…thourougly enjoy…reading others scriptures…it gives insight to me…at least I believe they do…into how others perceive the Light in their lives…I am conastantly amazed at many similarities the various world scriptures share with my own Christian faith and scriptures.

I do not “fear” books…there is nothing mystical or magical about books or the printed page…no “dark spirit” hovers over them awaiting unsuspecting Seekers to ambush and confuse them.

It is a book…and one insight the BoM provides is how it relates to the Hebrew/Christian scriptures and their formation into “scripture”.

I amaze a lot of people by my very pragmatice beliefs about books and their nature.
I understand completely. I have all those, too. The Imitation of Christ is one of my favorite books (but I’m Catholic, so that stands to reason). I admire anyone who likes to get their info from the primary sources! 👍
 
When I was LDS, I read the Book of Mormon cover-to-cover several times (twice while on my mission). I kept running into things that made no sense or strained credulity; many anachronisms that simply cannot be resolved. About 15 years after leaving the LDS church, I became active in debunking Mormonism on forums like this one, and so began re-reading sections of the BoM so as to maintain familiarity with it. Now I review sections of it as needed for debate purposes. The more I read it, the more ridiculous it seems.
Surely you’re not referring to things like Shiz, who ‘raised up on his hands…struggled for breath’ (Ether 15:29-31) are you?
 
Why? It’s a book…do I believe it? Do I believe it’s only a book? Yes. Do I believe it is historically accurate and that I believe Jews came to the Americas? No. Do I believe it has wisdom contained in it’s pages…Yes. Do I believe it was “brought forth by the hand and power of God.”…No.
Unfortunately, people who never existed have nothing at all to teach us.
It may surprise you to also know…I read the Science and Health as well…and Thomas A Kempis “imitation of Christ”…I have a wonderful translation of the Tao Te Ching by Stephen Mitchell I have sitting with my Bible…I also have a nice English copy of the Holy Qu’ran.

I enjoy…thourougly enjoy…reading others scriptures…it gives insight to me…at least I believe they do…into how others perceive the Light in their lives…I am conastantly amazed at many similarities the various world scriptures share with my own Christian faith and scriptures.
It’s nice to know that moral relativism is alive and well. Do you keep a copy of Mein Kampf on your nightstand, too? And the Satanic Bible, as well? Both have unique insights into the human condition so you could easily take something positive from them.
I do not “fear” books…there is nothing mystical or magical about books or the printed page…no “dark spirit” hovers over them awaiting unsuspecting Seekers to ambush and confuse them.

It is a book…and one insight the BoM provides is how it relates to the Hebrew/Christian scriptures and their formation into “scripture”.
Nor should you, but the problem isn’t with the book itself, but rather with how the LDS church presents it: as factual and of God Almighty, neither of which is true.

The BOM has nothing to do with Christian scripture other than pieces of it were plagiarized from the Bible. It’s a cheap copy and fails all claims of being divinely inspired.
 
Surely you’re not referring to things like Shiz, who ‘raised up on his hands…struggled for breath’ (Ether 15:29-31) are you?
No, although that is silly. I mean elephants, camels, horses, wheat, barley, linen, silk, glass, steel and wheeled chariots, which appear in the BOM but never existed on the American continent between 589 BC and 321 AD. This is scientific fact. The LDS have no credible defense for the obvious anachronisms in the BoM. They try all kinds of silly mental gymnastics and excuses:

The horses were really tapirs (which are more like pigs than horses).
The steel swords were really wooden clubs with obsidian embedded in them. :confused:
The camels were llamas.
The linen and silk were really cotton.
etc., etc., etc. - as if their god giving the translation to Joseph Smith did not know the proper English words for these things…

And there is absolutely no archaeological trace of any Hebrew- or Egyptian speaking people in the Americas. There is no trace of any battles where 1,130,000 soldiers died near the hill called Cumorah, which Mormon prophets have identified as the hill in New York where Joseph Smith claimed to find the golden plates. There is no trace of the hundreds of thousands of swords, chariots, metal helmets and breastplates. And the Amerindians have been proven through DNA to be descended from Siberian/Mongolian asiatics, not from Hebrews.

etc., etc., etc…

And the plant food staples that Amerindians really have eaten for millenia (beans, squash and amaranth) are not mentioned at all in the BoM.

That’s what I meant.
 
I have obviously read it being LDS.

There are a few doctrinal items that are not understood in main stream Christianity and as such the book is not accepted but for one to deny the book teaches Christs main points of doctrine is a gross mis-statement.

My recommendation is for a person who wants to read it to start in the book of Helaman and read to the end. You may very well still believe Joseph Smith wrote the book and you may not agree with everything but I believe it would be hard to state afterwards that the book does not testify of Christ our Savior.
I’ve checked I am not a member of the LDS Church and have read it or am reading it. Well actually I planned to read it cover to cover, but only read a few passages and put it down and never return to it.

I haven’t read it through, so I don’t know how much does or doesn’t testify, but the main problem with the Book of Mormon and all other third testament books, (and the koran) is that they are written after the death of St John the Evangelist on the Island of Patmos. I do not consider any book like that “sacred” since St John’s death ended the period of Divine Revelation.
 
No, although that is silly. I mean elephants, camels, horses, wheat, barley, linen, silk, glass, steel and wheeled chariots, which appear in the BOM but never existed on the American continent between 589 BC and 321 AD. This is scientific fact. The LDS have no credible defense for the obvious anachronisms in the BoM. They try all kinds of silly mental gymnastics and excuses:

The horses were really tapirs (which are more like pigs than horses).
The steel swords were really wooden clubs with obsidian embedded in them. :confused:
The camels were llamas.
The linen and silk were really cotton.
etc., etc., etc. - as if their god giving the translation to Joseph Smith did not know the proper English words for these things…

And there is absolutely no archaeological trace of any Hebrew- or Egyptian speaking people in the Americas. There is no trace of any battles where 1,130,000 soldiers died near the hill called Cumorah, which Mormon prophets have identified as the hill in New York where Joseph Smith claimed to find the golden plates. There is no trace of the hundreds of thousands of swords, chariots, metal helmets and breastplates. And the Amerindians have been proven through DNA to be descended from Siberian/Mongolian asiatics, not from Hebrews.

etc., etc., etc…

And the plant food staples that Amerindians really have eaten for millenia (beans, squash and amaranth) are not mentioned at all in the BoM.

That’s what I meant.
I apologize; I was being sarcastic there. I knew what you meant. I have to say, however, that I agree with Mormon apologists in that the lack of evidence for something isn’t evidence that it doesn’t exist. That’s the reason I use it as one piece of the refutation of Mormonism: combine the fact that the church seems to have mispaced three entire civilizations with the plagiarism of the KJV in both the BOM and POGP, the false prophecies of Joseph Smith, the constant revisions of the BOM and LDS texts, and the lies the church has told about both its history and itself and you really have a strong case.

On the point you made about the Hill Cumorah, Ether 15:2 states that “two millions” of Jaredites died there, and then some thousand years later, some 240,000 Nephites were conveniently killed at the same place. I simply round it up to 2.5 million since undoubtedly, some of the fictional Lamanites died there, too.

Get Quest for the Gold Plates if you haven’t already. It covers a lot of this in great detail.
 
Unfortunately, people who never existed have nothing at all to teach us.

It’s nice to know that moral relativism is alive and well. Do you keep a copy of Mein Kampf on your nightstand, too? And the Satanic Bible, as well? Both have unique insights into the human condition so you could easily take something positive from them.

Nor should you, but the problem isn’t with the book itself, but rather with how the LDS church presents it: as factual and of God Almighty, neither of which is true.

The BOM has nothing to do with Christian scripture other than pieces of it were plagiarized from the Bible. It’s a cheap copy and fails all claims of being divinely inspired.
As a matter of fact…I do own a copy of “Mein Kauf” and the “Satanic Bible” by Anton LaVey…and yes…they do teach me deep thing of the Spirit in regard to humanity…the Light dwelled even in Adoph Hitler…but the Light was dimmed almost to extinction by his hate and bigotry and his blindness to the worth of persons.

Anton LaVey saw only hypocricy in those who professed to be “Christian”…and in the “Satanic Bible” I read about a longing to know the Light…and the quest for the Light in a world of darkness.

“Moral relativism”…interesting arguement made by man Catholics on this board toward anyone…ANYONE who would disagree with them on any given subject…from politics…social justice…religous convictions…peace and violence. Some only see “violence” as being physical…“violence” can be quite verbal.

The BoM is and can be used by God to bring people into a greater understandin of the Light Within. He can take our brokeness and our failures…and our ignorance…and transform them to be used for His purposes…that millions have been touched by the words contained in this book…is no surprise to me…much of the “wisdom” of the Book of Mormon that some people find comfort in is directly from the Light Himself…He is able to make all things work together for His purposes…but it is because of His great Love and Mercy for us that he takes our most base failures and brings about a “marvelous work and wonder” in the lives of those who will only listen to Him…no matter where His words are found.

I commend you to the Light friend…may the Peace of God dwell in your heart in love.
 
Some only see “violence” as being physical…“violence” can be quite verbal.
“Some” - like the writers of most dictionaries.

You can fairly complain about mean-spirited comments, but trying to change the definitions of common words is exactly the kind of thing people mean when they talk about “moral relativism”.

No one on the forum has been violent.
 
elephants
science-frontiers.com/sf068/sf068b07.htm
camels
[Camel Pictures and Facts: South American Camels Page 1](Camel Pictures and Facts: South American Camels Page 1)
horse
nctimes.com/news/local/article_3510b187-f256-5b91-875e-b45c8865f14a.html
civilizations
web.campbell.edu/faculty/Slattery/WH14.htm?faculty/Slattery/WH14.htm
swords
maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/publications/review/?vol=9&num=1&id=250

5 minutes of google searches found this. I am not implying that these are accurate documentations only that to say none of these things existed is not correct.
The problem with anti-mormon theory is that it just gets circulated over and over and rarely if ever does the poster do any of their own research they just copy and paste. I have seen enough anti-mormon quotes in which they appear to have accurate references to words of church leaders and then when you actually go to the book the reference simply is not there and the words were never said. Many LDS members as well as scholars are guilty of defending something that was never said in the first place, it is just folklore. By that same measure many deny true and accurate statements that were made. The end result is Anti-Mormon messengers can easily distort truth into error.
 
elephants
science-frontiers.com/sf068/sf068b07.htm
camels
[Camel Pictures and Facts: South American Camels Page 1](Camel Pictures and Facts: South American Camels Page 1)
horse
nctimes.com/news/local/article_3510b187-f256-5b91-875e-b45c8865f14a.html
civilizations
web.campbell.edu/faculty/Slattery/WH14.htm?faculty/Slattery/WH14.htm
swords
maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/publications/review/?vol=9&num=1&id=250

5 minutes of google searches found this. I am not implying that these are accurate documentations only that to say none of these things existed is not correct.
The problem with anti-mormon theory is that it just gets circulated over and over and rarely if ever does the poster do any of their own research they just copy and paste. I have seen enough anti-mormon quotes in which they appear to have accurate references to words of church leaders and then when you actually go to the book the reference simply is not there and the words were never said. Many LDS members as well as scholars are guilty of defending something that was never said in the first place, it is just folklore. By that same measure many deny true and accurate statements that were made. The end result is Anti-Mormon messengers can easily distort truth into error.
Oh please! Some Indians told Thomas Jefferson that there were elephants in the great lakes? Is that the best you can do? And btw, no non-LDS believes anything from the Maxwell Institute (formerly known as FARMS).
 
Oh please! Some Indians told Thomas Jefferson that there were elephants in the great lakes? Is that the best you can do? And btw, no non-LDS believes anything from the Maxwell Institute (formerly known as FARMS).
choose to quote what you feel is the weakest part of the web link and deny the others?

Recent Survival Of The Elephant In The Americas

Mayan “elephant motif”.
Elephants were supposed to have disappeared from the America about 10,000 years ago as the Ice Ages waned. This date is another of those “consensus” scientific facts that no one dares challenge if he or she wishes to get published or win research grants. Although this subject remains “closed off” in normal scientific intercourse, there remain tantalizing hints that elephants roamed the Americas until very recently - perhaps even a few hundred years ago!

The following snippets are culled from two articles written by G. Carter, Texas A&M, now emeritus, but always heretical:

Numerous folk memories of the elephamt were retained by American Indians.
A mastadon was killed, cooked, and eaten by humans in Ecuador circa 1500 BC.
Indians told Thomas Jefferson that elephants could still be seen in the region of the Great Lakes.
In Florida, a cache of extinct animals, including elephants, was carbon-dated at 2000 BP.
Elephant heads are prominent in art and sculpture from Mexico, Central American, and northern South America.

You never even clicked the link to the maxwell institute link you just mocked the source.
Have it your way if you want but when you wish to be ignorant of a subject and mock another’s belief do your own research and not take someone else’s rehashed post of a post of post and send it out as truth almighty.
 
there is no evidence that they are the same or that they are not the same bt here are the bible references as they relate to biblical urim and thummim
Ex. 28: 30 (Lev. 8: 8) put in the breastplate of judgment the Urim and the Thummim.
Num. 27: 21 ask counsel for him after the judgment of Urim.
Deut. 33: 8 Let thy Thummim and thy Urim be with thy holy one.
1 Sam. 28: 6 Lord answered him not, neither by . . . Urim, nor by prophets.
Ezra 2: 63 (Neh. 7: 65) stood up a priest with Urim and with Thummim.
Rev. 2: 17 (D&C 130: 10) white stone, and in the stone a new name.
Wouldn’t JS and the Witnesses know how the miraculous event was recorded?

“He represented Joseph as sitting at a table with the plates before him, translating them by means of the Urim and Thummim, while he (Oliver) sat beside him writing every word as Joseph spoke them to him. **This was done by holding the ‘translators’ over the **hieroglyphics, the translation appearing distinctly on the instrument, which had been touched by the finger of God and dedicated and consecrated for the express purpose of translating languages. Every word was distinctly visible even to every letter; and if Oliver omitted a word or failed to spell a word correctly, the translation remained on the ‘interpreter’ until it was copied correctly.” 10

David Whitmer’s idea of translation is similar to Samuel Richards’s. Yet this view does not appear until 1875, nearly a half-century after Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery worked in David Whitmer’s home. His many statements on translation harmonize with his Address to All Believers In Christ, published in 1887 to supersede second-hand reports. There he gave his most detailed view of “the manner in which the Book of Mormon was translated”:

“Joseph Smith would put the seer stone into a hat and put his face in the hat, drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light. And in the darkness the spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and on that appeared the writing. One character at a time would appear and under it was the interpretation in English. Brother Joseph would read off the English to Oliver Cowdery, who was his principal scribe. And when it was written down and repeated to Brother Joseph to see if it was correct, then it would disappear, and another character with the interpretation would appear. Thus the Book of Mormon was translated by the gift and power of God and not by any power of man. The characters I speak of are the engravings on the golden plates from which the book was translated.” 11
 
I’ve checked I am not a member of the LDS Church and have read it or am reading it. Well actually I planned to read it cover to cover, but only read a few passages and put it down and never return to it.

I haven’t read it through, so I don’t know how much does or doesn’t testify, but the main problem with the Book of Mormon and all other third testament books, (and the koran) is that they are written after the death of St John the Evangelist on the Island of Patmos. I do not consider any book like that “sacred” since St John’s death ended the period of Divine Revelation.
👍👍
That’s right.
 
I am reading this series of writings that narrowly missed the Canonical decision. sacred-texts.com/bib/lbob/index.htm Some were later than Revelation. I see no/few errors in them. This is evidence that there was no “Apostasy” early in Christianity. They are NT in character, and very much unlike the hatred one sees in the BoM. Really very good.

When we see that many participants have read the BoM, or at least sampled through it enough to get an opinion about it, we understand that reading the BoM does not lead to conversion for people with good literacy levels and emotional stability.
 
*"…the main problem with the **Book of Mormon and all other third testament books, (and the koran) *is that they are written after the death of St John the Evangelist on the Island of Patmos. I do not consider any book like that “sacred” since St John’s death ended the period of Divine Revelation."

How does LDS answer this Apostolic concern?

(And I do mean the original Apostles - not the modern day ‘apostles’ as defined by the LDS.)
 
*"…the main problem with the **Book of Mormon and all other third testament books, (and the koran) ***is that they are written after the death of St John the Evangelist on the Island of Patmos. I do not consider any book like that “sacred” since St John’s death ended the period of Divine Revelation."

How does LDS answer this Apostolic concern?

(And I do mean the original Apostles - not the modern day ‘apostles’ as defined by the LDS.)
In complete agreement with you! We agree that Divine Revelation ended with the Death of the Apostles thus the need for a restoration of Divine Revelation and his Holy Priesthood
 
Mormonism is founded on Joseph Smith’s hallucinagenic trips which, in his egotism, he called “divine revelation.”
 
As I posted above:

I did LSD a few times and I have to wonder if Joseph Smith and friends were walking out into the woods to hunt psilocybin mushrooms, stare into a hat and view a couple of rocks for inspiration.

They didn’t actually need the hat, the tablets or the rocks.

I smoked hashish once as well, and received “visions” that normal humans wouldn’t otherwise contemplate.

magic-mushrooms.net/dangers.html
 
Oh please! Some Indians told Thomas Jefferson that there were elephants in the great lakes? Is that the best you can do? And btw, no non-LDS believes anything from the Maxwell Institute (formerly known as FARMS).
read 3rd Nephi chapters 8 through 12. What happened to most of the great cities? perhaps this gives some explanation to why historical items are not as great as what you find in Egypt, Jerusalem etc…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top