Having a problem believing in Hell

  • Thread starter Thread starter alongexpected
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
To attribute sinfulness to **our physical nature ** implies that life in this world is radically evil…
Not evil but the physical is inclined to the physical. Anyway, I’m just bringing up the different views. I may have explained it a bit wrong, I’m also just learning the different views of The Fall.
 
What do you call a “fact” here? I am aware of the fact that the catholic church exists. I am aware of what the bible says. I am aware of the cathecism. I am aware of what the church “claims”. I am aware of the fact that the church’s claims are not substantiated to my satisfaction. Yes, you see it correctly: to my satisfaction. That is the key here.
The judge is Chirst, not me. He will know if your state has a possiblity of salvation or not.
 
Not evil but the physical is inclined to the physical. Anyway, I’m just bringing up the different views. I may have explained it a bit wrong, I’m also just learning the different views of The Fall.
The one indisputable fact is that we are all victims of our ancestors’ transgressions.
 
Well, Mr. Spock, faith is truly a great mystery! Faith is of another order entirely from human deductions. Logical conclusions are only consequences of initial unprovable but acceptable premises. Grace takes us to another perspective entirely - to new premises, and hence to new conclusions and indeed to new horizons, a new creation: a world above this present one, a super-natural universe. And it is beyond our requirements, greater than our satisfactions.
And that kind of “faith” is what I do not have. Presumably God did not endow me with it. I see no difference between that kind of faith you mention and simple wishful thinking. See Hebrews 11:1 “Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see.”
 
And that kind of “faith” is what I do not have. Presumably God did not endow me with it. I see no difference between that kind of faith you mention and simple wishful thinking. See Hebrews 11:1 “Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see.”
I realize we are getting away from the OP, but because this is so important, I’m glad for it. As a former agnostic-atheist, I relate personally to your conclusions and rejections of faith - I once concluded and rejected it all too.

The passage from Hebrews that you quote is exactly right, of course - it is true, in the deepest sense of the word. I think your interpretation is not really to the heart of it, but the verse is very important. The Greek word you’ve translated “confidence” here - “faith is confidence in what we hope for…”, the Greek word hypostasis, literally means “substance,” “being” (as translated in Hebrews 1:3), or “reality” (as translated in Hebrews 3:14):

In Heb 1:3, Jesus is the very “nature” (hypostasis - the substance, the being) of God!
In Heb 3:14, “We have become partners of Christ if only we hold the beginning of the reality (hypostasis) firm until the end,” (NAB)

Faith, in other words, is substantial. It is a supernatural “substance” - it has “reality”. Faith is far more and other than mere “thinking”, wishful or not. A thought is like a breeze of the wind; it is felt for a moment and is gone. Faith is a substantial, supernatural reality that gives us “confidence”, true: strong confidence. Confidence so strong that a man would live by it! So strong he would die to remain true to it.

The rest of the 11:1 verse that you quote, faith is “the assurance about what we do not see.” The Greek word translated “assurance” here, elenchos, is usually translated “evidence” or “proof” - that which confirms what we believe to be true. Faith is the interior supernatural reality in the soul that confirms - proves - what is unseen and unseeable by the natural eyes, that we believe to be true about God.

Faith, then, is something of substance, and with it comes a way of seeing beyond physical vision - of another order than the natural, material and temporal. And it is most probably true that God has not yet “endowed” you with this gift. It is a gift! It is not a mere conclusion or deduction. It is an insight into the core and essence of things (a seeing in a sense, of God) that confirms - that “proves” - the real hope in us for light, for life, for truth.

I hope you will never lose the hope in you for truth! It is good to disdain mere “wishing” - but hope is far different and deeper than wishing. God placed in us hope, to move us toward Himself - toward the God who made us, and who ever calls us into blessed communion with Him in Jesus Christ.
 
Hello,

As the title states, I’m having a huge problem believing that there is a Hell, or at least that certain things the Church considers mortal sins would land you there. The specific “sins” have all been said before; masturbation, apostasy, birth control, missing one Mass. I started to look around at my family and friends. My older brothers and their wives, who have used birth control for years. My atheistic neighbor who is a wonderful family man and helps out around the block whenever he’s asked. My formerly-Catholic-who-turned-evangelical-aunt who is probably the warmest and kindest person I’ve ever known. Catholic doctrine demands that I believe that all these people would go to Hell if they died suddenly right now.

I used to think that Hell was just for murderers and such. Then I got older and learned all the Catholic prohibitions. Really turned me off. How in God’s name can you equate rape or murder with masturbation?

I’ve heard the counter to this; that it’s all God’s law, which has been clearly handed down and taught through the ages and we’re given the choice and all that. But, sorry, I just can’t see it. I can’t see my brother sent to Hell for birth control usage while Pol-Pot (let’s say he made a deathbed repentance/conversion) will eventually make it to Heaven. That makes zero sense.
I haven’t read through the whole thread, so I hope I’m not just repeating a point that has already been made.

The idea of hell as you’ve described it doesn’t make any sense at all. But your description involves a fundamental misunderstanding. It is common for people to think of hell in the same way as they think of the penal system. A just sentence in human courts are sentences that fit the crime. Unjust sentences are those that don’t. In human penal systems, punishments are not part of the crime. In other words, if someone is sent to prison for armed robbery, we don’t think of the sentence as being an intrinsic part of the armed robbery, rather it is society’s response to the criminal action. So separate is the sentence from the criminal action that people often commit crimes and receive no punishment at all.

The situation is completely different with sin and hell. Hell is an intrinsic part of sin; sin is it’s own punishment. Now some might argue that, for many, sin is enjoyable, and if sin is its own punishment, then hell is enjoyable. But in the context of eternity that simply isn’t possible, because sin spreads in the soul like leprosy on skin. I think it was C.S. Lewis who used the example of a sin as minor as grumbling. A person engaging in that vice could, in eternity, become nothing but a grumble.
 
And that kind of “faith” is what I do not have. Presumably God did not endow me with it. I see no difference between that kind of faith you mention and simple wishful thinking. See Hebrews 11:1 “Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see.”
Faith is a faculty. It is a means (the means) of perceiving the things of God. If you feel you don’t have faith, you can ask God to give it to you, and he will. But what might be holding you back is the desire to not be conned, to not be taken in. If so, then ask yourself if you would trust God to reveal the truth about himself to you if you asked him. You can consider this question even if you don’t believe in God. From there you can take the obvious next step: you can ask God, if he is there, to show you the truth about himself.
 
And that kind of “faith” is what I do not have. Presumably God did not endow me with it. I see no difference between that kind of faith you mention and simple wishful thinking. See Hebrews 11:1 “Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see.”
“No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him…” John 6:44.

You are absolutely correct Spock. If God has not drawn you, you cannot come to him.

Then again, as Pascal said, “you would not be seeking me if you had not found me…” and consequently, “if I had found you.”

And again, “Behold, I stand at the door and knock.” Revelation 3:20

Makes me wonder why you linger around here Spock. Maybe, just maybe, the whole Christianity thing is true? It sounds too good, I know, but…?
 
How can it sound wrong? When God created Adam and Eve, he called this creation “very good”. Their relationship with God was so close that they can see God because they are filled with God. When they sinned, that relationship with God has become fractured and humanity was deprived of God’s grace. The Sacraments, starting with Baptism, allows for us to receive grace once again.
“fill ourselves with grace” sounded rather Pelagian to me…
 
Faith is a faculty. It is a means (the means) of perceiving the things of God. If you feel you don’t have faith, you can ask God to give it to you, and he will. But what might be holding you back is the desire to not be conned, to not be taken in. If so, then ask yourself if you would trust God to reveal the truth about himself to you if you asked him. You can consider this question even if you don’t believe in God. From there you can take the obvious next step: you can ask God, if he is there, to show you the truth about himself.
I did before, and nothing happened. There was a time when I was a believer, and asked. Read this tongue-in-cheek article from The Onion: God answers prayers of paralyzed little boy
 
Makes me wonder why you linger around here Spock. Maybe, just maybe, the whole Christianity thing is true? It sounds too good, I know, but…?
It would be nice if there were a truly good and benevolent God. I would be tickled pink if there were one. But the God of Christianity simply does fit the bill. Too bad, so sad.
 
“fill ourselves with grace” sounded rather Pelagian to me…
Sometimes I wonder why forum posts are being analyzed at the level of scripture.

My intention to say there was once baptized, we can be filled with grace again, not by us but by God.
 
Sometimes I wonder why forum posts are being analyzed at the level of scripture.
:confused: If what you said was Pelagian, it was wrong, from a Catholic perspective. That’s the issue. Don’t try to make irrelevant excuses. We don’t have a duty to speak the truth only when we are analyzing scripture!
 
I did before, and nothing happened. There was a time when I was a believer, and asked. Read this tongue-in-cheek article from The Onion: God answers prayers of paralyzed little boy
Yeah, I get that. So did the writer of Job. My wife and I have adopted three special needs children, one of them with underdeveloped arms, and, needless to say, I pray for them daily.

Catholicism wouldn’t make any sense if this life was all there was. As St. Paul put it, if it is for this life only that we have hoped in Christ, then we are the most miserable of all people. But, thankfully, this life is only the front porch of a vast temple that is eternity. Right now, we are the seeds of plants to come.

My little girl with the underdeveloped arms (she has TARS syndrome) is a person with a genuine love for humanity who lights up every room she enters. She has a faith in God that is as natural to her as breathing. It is a privilege to be her father, and I thank God that he has permitted me to know such a person as her.

For a long time after she had an operation on her arm to straighten out her hand, she had to put a brace on her arm before going to bed. While this was going on, a tumor grew on my hand. It was initially diagnosed as malignant, and, to make a long story short, I wound up having three operations on it. After the second operation, the tumor was tested again, and found to be benign. The interpretation of this event broke into two camps: the miraculous healing camp, and the initial misdiagnosis camp. I said miracle. But I had to wear bandages and a splint on my hand for a time. Some miracle, huh?

Well, I learned what kind of miracle it was one night when I was putting my little girl to bed and helping her with her brace. After helping her with her brace, it became necessary to to adjust the accoutrements on my hand. My little girl asked me if I had to adjust my brace. Let me tell you something, Spock, I wouldn’t trade that moment of fellowship with my daughter for all the money in the world.

Needless to say, I had the same question you doubtlessly have: why can’t God heal my little girl? I’ve already told you about the kind of person she is.

The story of the man born blind in the Gospel of John came to my mind. In that story Jesus and the disciples come upon the man, and the disciples ask Jesus, “Who sinned, this man or his parents, so that this man was born blind?” Jesus responded, “It was neither that this man sinned, nor his parents, but that the works of God might be made manifest in him.”

The works of God are certainly made manifest in my little girl, in ways I never saw, or knew of, before. But in the story the man born blind was healed, wasn’t he? So, what’s the point of the story, that Jesus is selective about who he heals? No, the point of the story is that we can’t see the future. We can only judge things based on our knowledge of the present and past. Up to the point the blind man was healed, his suffering would have appeared as senseless any other suffering. After all, he was born blind, what could he have done to deserve it? But after he was healed, he became a witness, and, hence, an agent of redemption for others.

Keep asking God to reveal himself to you.
 
I don’t understand…one unconfessed mortal sin is a Hell-sentence. Is that not Catholic doctrine?
You are looking at the letter rather than the spirit of the law. Bear in mind, we are made in God’s image. God is love and thus we are to mirror that image.

In the Old Testament, the 2 great recurring sins that ultimately led to exile were idolatry and social injustice… Jesus deals with these sins when He gave us the commandment of love…Love God and love neighbor.

I had a co-worker once who had this incredibly irritating habit of whistling…nothing in particular, just whisling. He knew it bothered me (and everyone else) but he just kept on whistling. Sin can be like that for God. The church lays out those actions that are really irritating to God and tells us that we are to avoid them… If we continue acting in this manner we offend God and do harm to our relationship with Him. In a word, we refuse to love Him.

The fact is, no one can say committing one sin or another damns you to eternal fire. That is God’s purview, not ours. All the Church says is that committing a certain sin puts our soul in* jeopardy *of separating ourselves from the love of God.

As for your relatives, friends and neighbors…the fact that they are committing sins does not mean that they are not sinning and irritating God. As much as you don’t want the church to dictate behavior, you are being arrogant by presuming to dictate that certain behaviors should not be a part of God’s justice…

Now, why would you do that???

If the Church was instituted by Christ and guided by the Holy Spirit, maybe, just maybe she has the wisdom and theological insight to aid believers to sainthood.
 
:confused: If what you said was Pelagian, it was wrong, from a Catholic perspective. That’s the issue. Don’t try to make irrelevant excuses. We don’t have a duty to speak the truth only when we are analyzing scripture!
I misspoke okay. Pardon that English is not my first language.
Its one thing to help correct someone, its another to accuse another of heresy.
 
I misspoke okay. Pardon that English is not my first language.
Its one thing to help correct someone, its another to accuse another of heresy.
I pointed out an apparent error in your formulation and asked you about it, that is all. Please don’t make anything more than that out of what I said. Your English seems fine, I don’t buy that as an excuse for your inability to just admit that your words were ill-chosen. Doing so shouldn’t be a big deal, it shouldn’t be something you get defensive about - sorry, but that just does not seem to indicate a linguistic competence issue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top