P
Peter_J
Guest
Code:Originally Posted by **Peter J**Presumably that’s not the only alternative.
Code:Originally Posted by **Peter J**Presumably that’s not the only alternative.
Open my mind to what? The point of this thread was to learn what is the Eastern faith. One person is insisting that the belief is based on Latin teaching. To open my mind on that is to accept Latinization. I am saying what is the Eastern teaching and the Eastern faith. I can’t change that position because it is not up to me to change that, I am not a Father of the faith. If there are Eastern parishes that profess a Latinized faith, well, that happens. I mean, does every RC parish follow the GIRM? So don’t tell me that just because one Eastern parish doesn’t faithfully follow Eastern tradition it means that is our faith. It is like saying, why is this RC parish doing Mass this way (abuse filled), should I assume that is how Mass should be celebrated?But isn’t that the easy way out - to dismiss certain opinions as latinizations? That prevents you from having an open mind and maybe learn something?
If celebrate when some egg you on, but block out completely those who have a different view, is that a good thing?
True, but you can see my point: the relevant belief might be one that isn’t being reconsidered at the present time. (Just a thought.)Posted by Peter J
What other alternatives to an open mind exist but a closed one?Presumably that’s not the only alternative.
But isn’t that the easy way out - to dismiss certain opinions as latinizations? That prevents you from having an open mind and maybe learn something? ?
Not necessarily. Consider: no one can be expected to constantly reconsider every belief that they hold, simply because they’re aware of people who disagree.
So they’re expected to constantly keep a closed- mind about other perspectives?
Hey, How do you do that neat thing of quoting quotes inside of quotes?Presumably that’s not the only alternative.
So what is the open mind for? To accept false ideas?What other alternatives to an open mind exist but a closed one?
But Constantine, How would you truly know they were false if you’re never open to considering a different point of view? How would anyone?So what is the open mind for? To accept false ideas?
I know the answer… raises hand…So what is the open mind for? To accept false ideas?
What I put forth is authentic Eastern teaching which is part of our traditions and has been taught by the Fathers for 2000 years. What do I need to open my mind to? The ramblings of a layperson who knows absolutely nothing about Eastern spirituality? Over the teachings of the Eastern Fathers?But Constantine, How would you truly know they were false if you’re never open to considering a different point of view? How would anyone?
Are you saying that to be humble is to give up the truth? Sorry, but we have a long list of saints who had fiery attitudes when it comes to defending the truth. Stubbornness for the truth is not a sin.Humility is the foundation of all the other virtues hence, in the soul in which this virtue does not exist there cannot be any other virtue except in mere appearance.
~ St. Augustine
Surely, you’re not saying that Latin traditions (even more, Catholic doctrine) are lies you must defend the Truth from?Are you saying that to be humble is to give up the truth? Sorry, but we have a long list of saints who had fiery attitudes when it comes to defending the truth. Stubbornness for the truth is not a sin.
As I said over and over. You don’t expect an American living in America to live Japanese culture. It is not about whether Japanese culture is good or bad, the fact is the American is American, and therefore should live the life of an American.Surely, you’re not saying that Latin traditions (even more, Catholic doctrine) are lies you must defend the Truth from?
What I mean is, there are alternatives to “constantly reconsidering every belief that they hold” and “constantly keeping a closed- mind about other perspectives”.What other alternatives to an open mind exist but a closed one?
Anyway Peter, you made that comment when I told Constantine that he needed to be open minded. Since he is considering breaking with Peter, then he should consider other viewpoints before making such a faith-altering decision.What I mean is, there are alternatives to “constantly reconsidering every belief that they hold” and “constantly keeping a closed- mind about other perspectives”.
Does one of those two (“constantly reconsidering every belief” or “constantly keeping a closed- mind about other perspectives”) describe you? Probably not.
Thank you for getting us back to trunk that we branched off from.Anyway Peter, you made that comment when I told Constantine that he needed to be open minded. Since he is considering breaking with Peter, then he should consider other viewpoints before making such a faith-altering decision.
I think he might fit right in among Melkite Catholics. (Unfortunately Melkites are few and far between in North America.)Whether Eastern Catholics or Latin Catholics, we are Catholic and we should understand what we both believe. In fact, our differences, should not be monumental, otherwise, why do we call each other Catholic?
I don’t feel I am getting a balanced sense of what EC’s believe in this thread not because I don’t’ want to accept the answer, but because only a few have chosen to respond.
And Constantine, no offense, but you are so close to the Orthodox side in your spiritual journey (as you’ve publicly made known), your view is definitely colored by Orthodox goggles.
Interesting… I kind of feel the same way about myself.I think he might fit right in among Melkite Catholics. (Unfortunately Melkites are few and far between in North America.)
Could you clarify what you mean by Oriental Catholic?The one thing I still don’t know is whether the current rules that apply in various Oriental Catholic Churches permit such routine, case-by-case exercises of economy regarding reception of Holy Communion, or whether the current rules have essentially imposed a Latin approach on them.
Constantine, you and I both know those particular postings are erroneous.Unity or not, over 30 pages of this thread have been dedicated to repeated postings about not having any difference.
I meant all Catholics who are not members of the Latin Church: so any/all of the twenty-two eastern Catholic churches.Could you clarify what you mean by Oriental Catholic?
OIC. This is, as a matter of fact, something I’ve been wondering about recently.I meant all Catholics who are not members of the Latin Church: so any/all of the twenty-two eastern Catholic churches.
I think when I made that post, I avoided “eastern Catholic” because I didn’t want to give the impression I was referring only to Byzantine Catholics, since dzheremi - who isn’t a Byzantine at all - was the source of one of our primary examples of how Orthodox may sometimes receive Holy Communion before confessing a serious sin, if their pastor approves.
Unfortunately, I acknowledge that there’s really no adequately dependable catch-all term. “Eastern Catholic” to some means “Byzantine Catholic,” whereas “Oriental Catholic” to others means “non-Byzantine Eastern Catholics.” Ah, well.