L
LilyM
Guest
What on earth does that last sentence have to do with ANYTHING? That’s what I mean by irrational - that comment totally has no bearing on the matter.Come on, take a breath, please. I am not irrational, I know my comments sound hard, but I only aim to protect the Roman Catholic Church from something that on my view does not seem right. Before you lose your patience, try to understand what he said on this interview:
Source: ca.reuters.com/article/idCAL1466485620080718
I am not a Priest, but I understand that nobody is forced to take vows.
Why mention vows? It’s not like he vowed not to play music, or vowed to spend all his time praying and have no outside interests, or that he’s breaking his vows of poverty, chastity or obedience with what he’s doing.
OK, so his music isn’t aimed to bring people to Christ. Fair enough. Many priests and religious have outside interests - they study astronomy (Copernicus being one), teach English literature, grow roses or what have you. St John Bosco did circus tricks, Pope John Paul was an actor and keen athlete, St Therese of Lisieux performed in plays in the convent.
One priest of my acquaintance took the lead in a local production of Fiddler on the Roof since he had a great singing voice and was a good actor. One of the nuns who taught me in school also performed in the local Philharmonia Choir.
They may not pursue these interests with the avowed aim of bringing people to Christ by doing them, sure, but they ARE human beings, they ARE allowed (in fact most religious are ORDERED) to do things that normal people do - things other than pray - with their time. And those pursuits CAN be secular in nature without in any way interfering with their primary vocation as a priest or religious.