M
mikeledes
Guest
It speaks about those who have fallen away with finality.Hebrews 6 speaks against reverts, Mike.
God Bless,
Michael
It speaks about those who have fallen away with finality.Hebrews 6 speaks against reverts, Mike.
I understand the point you’re driving at Mike.It speaks about those who have fallen away with finality.
the versus doesn’t discuss grace. Salvation as understood by the Church of Christ, not the calvin understand. It is inconsistent with the calvin understanding. Proving the point.I understand the point you’re driving at Mike.
In order for you to be consistent with your point—that the elect can lose salvation—you must also be consistent with the passage, that once salvation is lost, according to this verse, it can never be regained; therefore, all who leave the RCC have lost their salvation, and they cannot regain it through reversion.
This passage does not allow for going back, and forth, or, for falling in, and out of grace.
Unless, of course, you don’t care about being consistent.![]()
Whatever that means. :hypno:the versus doesn’t discuss grace. Salvation as understood by the Church of Christ, not the calvin understand. It is inconsistent with the calvin understanding. Proving the point.
Those who are predestined to glory will not be lost. But community of the justified is not coextensive with those predestined to glory. In this passage, Paul (? ) specifically has in view those who have fallen away and will obstinately remain in that state. They will not come back because they have completely hardened their hearts. God will allow these to remain in that state.I understand the point you’re driving at Mike.
In order for you to be consistent with your point—that the elect can lose salvation—you must also be consistent with the passage, that once salvation is lost, according to this verse, it can never be regained; therefore, all who leave the RCC have lost their salvation, and they cannot regain it through reversion.
This passage does not allow for going back, and forth, or, for falling in, and out of grace.
Unless, of course, you don’t care about being consistent.![]()
The author is not speaking of ones whom are** SAVED**!“…For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.”(KJV)
I often hear this verse used against those (like myself) who have crossed the Tiber and returned to the Church. What is interesting is that it directly goes against thier doctrine of ‘once saved always saved’.
Hebrews 6 is about apostates from Christianity-not denominationsHebrews 6 speaks against reverts, Mike.
All right, you’ve fallen from grace–that doesn’t mean you inevitably ever knew grace. It means you have fallen away from grace as a principle, there’s a lot of ways to explain that. But basically what he’s saying is that if you live by law you have fallen from the principle of grace, whether you’re a regenerate or unregenerate. If I go out and try to live my Christian life legalistically I’ve fallen from the grace principle, right? So he’s writing to believers and he’s saying if you’re going to live your life by law, having begun in the Spirit are you perfected by the flesh? If you’re going to start living by law you have fallen away from grace as a principle of living. That’s all. You have to see the context there.Hebrews 6 is about apostates from Christianity-not denominations![]()
Foolish me I forgot according to alot Of Protestants Catholics aren’t Christian-what a faux pas
![]()
Paul (? ) specifically has in view those who have fallen away and will obstinately remain in that state. They will not come back because they have completely hardened their hearts. God will allow these to remain in that state.
This is my personal observation only, but this is kind of how I see this verse playing out with someone I know quite well. This person I know is a self-professing OSAS, self-professing Born Again Christian. However I (along with others) know that he has committed a heinous and horrible sin. Catholics would call it a very grave mortal sin). Anyway this person has justified this sin in his heart to the point he doesn’t feel it was a sin. Since he has justified this sin to the point he believes it is no longer a sin, he feels no need to repent of it. The human heart has a huge capacity for denial. He can no longer be brought to repentance because he now feels he has nothing to repent of.God Bless,
Michael
Forgive me, Mike, I phrased your point badly; I know you believe that the elect to glory—with respect to salvation, the only kind of elect scripture knows—will never perish.Those who are predestined to glory will not be lost.
Here’s where we disagree; scripture knows those who are elect, and those who are not elect.But community of the justified is not coextensive with those predestined to glory.
The passage says nothing about "obstinancy, or hardened hearts,” but is stating the penalty meted out to those who leave the community of believers (cf 1 Jn 2:19).In this passage, Paul (? ) specifically has in view those who have fallen away and will obstinately remain in that state. They will not come back because they have completely hardened their hearts. God will allow these to remain in that state.
Any Catholic, baptized in the RCC, according to RCC theology, has been regenerated, or born-again, of the spirit, and is, what you call above, a “genuine believer;” therefore, in order for you to be consistent with the passage, it must, in the RCC context, apply to reverts.The problem with this passage is that the characteristics of the group of people described in Hebrews 6 are those of genuine Christians.
The key is verse 6. If there was no genuine repentance to begin with, how can they be renewed again to something they never did or experienced. Secondly, if their first repentance was not a genuine repentance, then why would we want to renew them again to a fake or superficial repentance again? Wouldn’t we want them to genuinely repent?
The other key verse is verse 4. They are described as “partakers of the Holy Spirit.” In the Bible, to partake is not merely an association. Partake means more than just a mere association, it means to have an actual share in or potion of something. For example:
How can a person who has repented (Heb. 6:6), been made a “partaker of the Holy Spirit” and be “sanctified by the blood of Christ”, not be a genuine Christian? Indeed, the word “sanctified” has been used in the Bible to mean set apart for a specific holy purpose, but the Bible never uses sanctified by the blood of Christ if it is not referring to Christians.
Again this is on a personal level from my personal experience and observation- Your arguments (referring to Linkowski’s posts) are great intellectually, I have heard them all before. The problem is when you are dealing with real people and real situations in real churches. This interpretation is totally detrimental to spiritual growth and transformation. If I took your arguments to the logical conclusion then the majority of people who truly believe, (truly at this moment in time believe they are born again and saved) may actually have a false security because if they don’t persevere to the end,- lets say fall away, they were never saved to begin with. Therefore most of the people in the pews of my evangelical church who are willfully sinning aren’t really saved. (and as an almost Catholic I too believe if they are continuing to willfully sin they aren’t in a state of saving grace) Yet OSAS is preached in the pulpit, so they think they are saved so therfore they aren’t really making an effort to grow into Christ because they don’t need to (because that would be then works salvation anyway which is wrong) so they continue to wallow in their sin thinking they are saved. However on the other hand, there is also another group in same said church that recognize their sin and acknowledge they were never saved (according to this interpretation) to begin with, so they repent and rededicate themselves to Christ and make the profession for Christ so they can be saved , over and over every time they fall into sin.Your insinuation is that people can come to Christ and be justified and then lose their salvation later. NOBODY can come to Him unless the Father effectually draws them and the WILL be raised at the last day.
Please provide examples of the word “partaker” used in the way you use it. Also, the following verses do not overshadow “sanctify.” Or can a person that is not genuinely saved by sanctified by the blood of Christ and be a partaker of the Holy Spirit?In Hebrews 6:4-6 - we have the word “partaker” that you are trying to squeeze. This can mean multiple things and is used in different ways in scripture. You cannot simply say…"it is used this way in this text and so it has to mean the same thing in another text”. When you look at those scriptures that indicate one is willfully rejecting Christ (blaspheming the Holy Spirit), they are simply evidencing that they are a goat and not a sheep…
John 10:27 **My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:**28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
It is the sheep that hear His voice and follow. Hebrews 6:4-6 is, again, accompained by verse 9…
Heb 6:9 But, beloved, we are persuaded better things of you, and things that accompany salvation, though we thus speak.
Though we are speaking this way - we are expecting other things - THINGS THAT ACCOMPANY SALVATION.
We have Hebrews 10:26-29 which starts off this way…
Hebrews 10:26 For **if we sin willfully **after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
Again - what does 1John say??
1John 3:6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
1Jo 5:18 We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not.
You do not seem to want to hear those scriptures…
Your word, “sanctified” in Heb 10:29 that you flash about regularly is overshadowed by Heb 10:14…
Heb 10:14 For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are (being) sanctified.
The word “sanctified” can be used in many different ways as it is used in verse 29 (I have pointed out it’s use in 1 Corinthians 7 before).
Hebrews 10:14 is accompanied by John 13:10:
Joh 13:10 Jesus saith to him, He that is washed needeth not save to wash his feet, but is clean every whit: and ye are clean, but not all.
You also have another problem in this passsage - at the end it says…
Heb 10:39 But **we are not of those **who shrink back to destruction, but of those who have faith to the preserving of the soul.
John says after a similar passage (1John 5:16 - Sin leading to death)…
1Jo 5:19 We know that we are of God, and that the whole world lies in the power of the evil one.
He is saying the same thing…the people who draw back never were - BUT we are of God!!
Cont’d
This is just silly. If you are going to tell a Catholic what the Catholic Theology is then at least state Catholic Theology.In a Catholic context, the penalty is that, those who leave the One True Church (OTC), and go to what Benedict just recently called, a church that is not “a true church,” or if they leave and go to no church at all, their leaving the OTC renders future repentance AN IMPOSSIBILITY.
Any Catholic, baptized in the RCC, according to RCC theology, has been regenerated, or born-again, of the spirit, and is, what you call above, a "genuine believer;" therefore, in order for you to be consistent with the passage, it must, in the RCC context, apply to reverts.
(Baptismal regeneration gives a false sense of security.)
I’m not telling anyone what Catholic theology is; rather, I’m putting Mike’s argument concerning Heb 6:4-6 in a Catholic context.This is just silly. If you are going to tell a Catholic what the Catholic Theology is then at least state Catholic Theology.
Please show me where the Catholic Church teaches anything close to what you are claiming here.
Chuck