hell

  • Thread starter Thread starter billcu1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

billcu1

Guest
Where did the ideas of hell being a place of fire begin? First we must look at what hell is. There is sheoul, gahenna, and tartarus. Hephestus was a blacksmith and worked around fire and took care of the place of the dead which is what sheoul is. The torment is being without god I guess. Does anyone know much about this subject?
 
Where did the ideas of hell being a place of fire begin? First we must look at what hell is. There is sheoul, gahenna, and tartarus. Hephestus was a blacksmith and worked around fire and took care of the place of the dead which is what sheoul is. The torment is being without god I guess. Does anyone know much about this subject?
It comes from the NT, where our LORD Himself warned about the “Gehenna of fire”.

Better to go into life eternal one handed, one footed or one eyed than to go whole bodied into Gehenna of fire. (Especially since in life eternal, you receive pneumatikon soma, anyhow:)).

Earlier, in one of the prophets (Zechariah?) there is a reference to worms that will not die ,and to fires that will not be quenched, upon the bodies of YHWH’s enemies. This would have to be in an afterlife, because a dead body cannot be “punished.” Our LORD quotes this prophecy in HIS NT teaching on Gehenna.

Gehenna of fire comes from a valley, called Hinnom, outside the walls of Jerusalem where the city’s debris was burnt; this included unclaimed dead bodies. Obviously, the former owners of the bodies did not experience this as punishment, nor were the fires at Hinnom “unquenchable.” It was a metaphor for punishment in a realm beyond death.

Alleluia, ICXC NIKA!
 
Where did the ideas of hell being a place of fire begin? First we must look at what hell is. There is sheoul, gahenna, and tartarus. Hephestus was a blacksmith and worked around fire and took care of the place of the dead which is what sheoul is. The torment is being without god I guess. Does anyone know much about this subject?
From the Prophets…through the Apostolic writers…the end of all things results in “the elements will burn with fervent heat”. If you are not found in the Lamb’s Book of Life…you are cast into the ever receding, ever fleeing Lake of Fire.

now, the problem with the “God is too loving to send anyone to hell” argument is…that God really doesn’t SEND people to hell…WE’RE STANDING IN IT.
 
From the Prophets…through the Apostolic writers…the end of all things results in “the elements will burn with fervent heat”. If you are not found in the Lamb’s Book of Life…you are cast into the ever receding, ever fleeing Lake of Fire.

now, the problem with the “God is too loving to send anyone to hell” argument is…that God really doesn’t SEND people to hell…WE’RE STANDING IN IT.
A neighbor of ours has a bumper sticker on his car “Pardon me, but which level of hell is this?”
 
It comes from the NT, where our LORD Himself warned about the “Gehenna of fire”.

Better to go into life eternal one handed, one footed or one eyed than to go whole bodied into Gehenna of fire. (Especially since in life eternal, you receive pneumatikon soma, anyhow:)).

Earlier, in one of the prophets (Zechariah?) there is a reference to worms that will not die ,and to fires that will not be quenched, upon the bodies of YHWH’s enemies. This would have to be in an afterlife, because a dead body cannot be “punished.” Our LORD quotes this prophecy in HIS NT teaching on Gehenna.

Gehenna of fire comes from a valley, called Hinnom, outside the walls of Jerusalem where the city’s debris was burnt; this included unclaimed dead bodies. Obviously, the former owners of the bodies did not experience this as punishment, nor were the fires at Hinnom “unquenchable.” It was a metaphor for punishment in a realm beyond death.

Alleluia, ICXC NIKA!
Worms that will not die. Weeping and gnashing of teeth. I know that one. They believed “The Worm” caused toothaches or that they were caused by a worm.
 
Worms that will not die. Weeping and gnashing of teeth. I know that one. They believed “The Worm” caused toothaches or that they were caused by a worm.
Any connection to one of the signs in Jonah? The worm that destroyed the gourd plant provided by the Lord; isn’t the belly of a beast sometimes referred to as its gourd?
 
A neighbor of ours has a bumper sticker on his car “Pardon me, but which level of hell is this?”
I also like “Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?”
Where did the ideas of hell being a place of fire begin?
Probably with reflection on how horribly painful fire is.
Hephestus was a blacksmith and worked around fire and took care of the place of the dead
I think you may be confusing Hephaestus with Hades.
 
I’ve been told a couple of times that Judaism does not espouse the concept of internal punishment in Hell. It’s not the clearest of things in the Bible, imo.
 
It comes from the NT, where our LORD Himself warned about the “Gehenna of fire”.

Better to go into life eternal one handed, one footed or one eyed than to go whole bodied into Gehenna of fire. (Especially since in life eternal, you receive pneumatikon soma, anyhow:)).

Earlier, in one of the prophets (Zechariah?) there is a reference to worms that will not die ,and to fires that will not be quenched, upon the bodies of YHWH’s enemies. This would have to be in an afterlife, because a dead body cannot be “punished.” Our LORD quotes this prophecy in HIS NT teaching on Gehenna.

Gehenna of fire comes from a valley, called Hinnom, outside the walls of Jerusalem where the city’s debris was burnt; this included unclaimed dead bodies. Obviously, the former owners of the bodies did not experience this as punishment, nor were the fires at Hinnom “unquenchable.” It was a metaphor for punishment in a realm beyond death.

Alleluia, ICXC NIKA!
👍 “metaphor” is the key word which neatly disposes of crude interpretations of Christ’s teaching.
 
I also like “Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?”

Probably with reflection on how horribly painful fire is.

I think you may be confusing Hephaestus with Hades.
Oh I maybe. I know Hephaestus had the hammer. Maybe it was Hades then. I guess heaven would’ve been the elysian fields. Dionysis too I guess changed water to wine on what is now the Epiphany. I am not an initiate of the greek mysteries but I do know this. It was Hera (Socrates) that was killed by her/his peoples.
 
I also like “Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?”

Probably with reflection on how horribly painful fire is.

I think you may be confusing Hephaestus with Hades.
What did the vulgate say? tartarus or hades?
 
What did the vulgate say? tartarus or hades?
The Greek word Tartarus is used only once in the NT.

Everywhere else, it’s Hades, or Gehenna.

In the OT, Sheol.

FWIW, Scripture never says that human beings go to Tartarus, only “angels who sinned.” Once, someone (Lazarus’ nemesis in Luke 16) is said to go to Hades on death; so they must be distinct.

ICXC NIKA
 
It comes from the NT, where our LORD Himself warned about the “Gehenna of fire”.

Better to go into life eternal one handed, one footed or one eyed than to go whole bodied into Gehenna of fire. (Especially since in life eternal, you receive pneumatikon soma, anyhow:)).

Earlier, in one of the prophets (Zechariah?) there is a reference to worms that will not die ,and to fires that will not be quenched, upon the bodies of YHWH’s enemies. This would have to be in an afterlife, because a dead body cannot be “punished.” Our LORD quotes this prophecy in HIS NT teaching on Gehenna.

Gehenna of fire comes from a valley, called Hinnom, outside the walls of Jerusalem where the city’s debris was burnt; this included unclaimed dead bodies. Obviously, the former owners of the bodies did not experience this as punishment, nor were the fires at Hinnom “unquenchable.” It was a metaphor for punishment in a realm beyond death.

Alleluia, ICXC NIKA!
Hum Zechariah. Was that the Babylonian captivity? What was the Assiryo/Babylonia concept of after life. Was it still sheoul? Or it could be like Isaiah were that went back in talking about the king of Babylon and stuck LUCIFER there. And modified the scriptures to the then current teachings. I’ll look at Babylonia period afterlife.
 
Hum Zechariah. Was that the Babylonian captivity? What was the Assiryo/Babylonia concept of after life. Was it still sheoul? Or it could be like Isaiah were that went back in talking about the king of Babylon and stuck LUCIFER there. And modified the scriptures to the then current teachings. I’ll look at Babylonia period afterlife.
Whooh, beau coup questions there!

Zechariah lived after the return from Babylon.

The Babylonians did not use the Hebrew word Sheol; but their idea of human eschatology is basically the same as the Greco-Romans’ or almost everybody down to now: there is a human afterlife, for everybody, but it is a sad existence of shadow beings huddled in darkness wishing for life.

This idea was carried on into Greek Hades and modern times.

The Babylonians did not, however, hold to positive punishment for sinners in an afterlife.

ICXC NIKA
 
Whooh, beau coup questions there!

Zechariah lived after the return from Babylon.
Oh ok. Unsure there.
The Babylonians did not use the Hebrew word Sheol; but their idea of human eschatology is basically the same as the Greco-Romans’ or almost everybody down to now: there is a human afterlife, for everybody, but it is a sad existence of shadow beings huddled in darkness wishing for life.
This idea was carried on into Greek Hades and modern times.
The Babylonians did not, however, hold to positive punishment for sinners in an afterlife.
ICXC NIKA
I’m sure the Babylonians didn’t use sheol. I was thinking of the babylonian captivity. Where they might’ve picked up from their ideas. Got away from God as it were. Ok.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top