M
mikeledes
Guest
I reaffirm what I said here and present John 15 as a clear example of someone who was in Christ but was blotted out of the Book of Life (“takes away”, “dries up,” “cast into the fire.”) The language is clearly that of damnation, as many of your fellow Sola Fide Eternal Security Protestants believe and affirm. You are right in seeing that the Branches as symbolizing those who are genuinely “in Christ” and they are right in seeing the “cast into the fire” and “takes away” as a clear reference to eternal damnation. Combine the two and you end up with the clear striaghtforward meaning of the passage both you and they are desperately trying to evade, namely, the Catholic one. Why do you and your fellow belivers contradict each other on the meaning of this passage?I accept the simple and clear teachings of Paul in Romans 4. What I don’t accept is your teachings on Romans 4. There are other verses that present clear teaching, such as John 15, which you interpret in such a way that completely changes the straightforward meaning and usage of the words and that even contradicts what your fellow “eternal security” Protestants have said about that verse. Take the following for example:
This is from the “Grace to You” Website"http://www.gty.org/index.php
Which upholds the doctrine of “eternal security.” They see the “thrown in the fire” as a clear reference to eternal damnation, NOT a form of temporal punishment. But at least you have the good sense to see that the branches can only refer to thos who have been saved because the “branches” are described as being in Christ (In ME). Unless one has been genuinely incorporated into Christ, one could not be a branch of the vine. Otherwise, one would not be a branch to begin with. But at least you see through that error, so you’re not that bad.
But the fact that the supporters of eternal security are evading the straightforward meaning of the text at all cost is understandable because it completely contradicts their teaching. Their unwillingness to see (I won’t use “unbelief”) makes any appeal to logic, common sense, and other supporting Bible passages (like the ones I’ve listed earlier) fall on deaf ears.
God Bless,
Michael
It is about fruit bearing and how we are able to bear fruit through our relationship with Christ. But it also discusses what happens to those who willingly refuse to bear fruit to God, eternal damnation.
God Bless,
Michael