D
DeSanto
Guest
Recently I’ve ventured into the CARM forums, seeking to gain experience in my apologetic skills. I have entered into a most ridiculous debate with one wanting to disparage the
Church for our ecumenical approach towards Muslims. I understand there are mixed feelings about CCC paragraph 841, the infamous “Quran kiss” by JPII, and the recent Good Friday service, even among ourselves.
Well, let me just show you a couple snipits of quotes from the conversation. Pay close attention to the last quote. I would like to bring this debate to a swift end and just lay it down for him. Can anyone help me with a quick, to the point response that really just gets down to the brass tax?
This guy is wondering why the ccc pg.841 is so vague in teaching the Muslims the truth about the Gospel. I suppose he would rather we would have gave them a good thrashing for their beliefs.
Him:
Him:
Church for our ecumenical approach towards Muslims. I understand there are mixed feelings about CCC paragraph 841, the infamous “Quran kiss” by JPII, and the recent Good Friday service, even among ourselves.
Well, let me just show you a couple snipits of quotes from the conversation. Pay close attention to the last quote. I would like to bring this debate to a swift end and just lay it down for him. Can anyone help me with a quick, to the point response that really just gets down to the brass tax?
This guy is wondering why the ccc pg.841 is so vague in teaching the Muslims the truth about the Gospel. I suppose he would rather we would have gave them a good thrashing for their beliefs.
Him:
Me:So the Roman Catholic Church did not want to offend the Muslims because they are afraid of them? The Great Commission is to preach the gospel to every creature; to the Jew first. But the Pope obviously has no regard for what the Lord Jesus says.
It is not out of fear, rather it is out of wisdom. It is not wise to purposefully offend and it would be irresponsible of us to intentionally provoke or insight violence.
Him:43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[a] and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,
Me:You cannot love the Muslims into heaven
We keep going back and forth. I speak of actions speaking louder than words, being peacemakers, humbling ourselves, loving one another as ourselves, putting down our swords, basically making it plain that showing people the Love of Christ in ourselves is what we are commissioned to do. That only love can conquer. Then he goes on quoting verses on how Jesus did not come to bring peace to the world but a sword, Muslims are gentiles that sacrifice to devils, how can two walk together, except they be agreed, blasting Pope Francis for calling them “brothers and sisters”, ect. ect. Then we get to this quote…The Lord says to love your enemies, so tell Him you cannot do it, not me. He didn’t say love your enemies “into heaven”, just simply, love your enemies. Converting people is God’s deal, we are just called to be His witness.
Him:
WOW! That’s a bold statement. Is he saying the Gospel saves, not Christ Love? Or is he saying, Christ’s Love is not in me? I mean, I want to give a really good response to this guy and end this conversation once and for all. Can anyone help me with this?It is the Gospel that saves not your love, Christ’s love for lost mankind!