The issue with the Charismatic Renewal is that it’s dependency is on the emotions and without them the worship turns stale.
Sorry, but this isn’t true. Consolation and desolation is particularly Ignatian language in reference to the spiritual life (though other traditions use those, or similar, terms). Whether one is “charismatic” or not has no bearing on how one views these things, assuming, of course, that the person is well-schooled in the spiritual life. I know plenty of “non-charismatic” Catholics who rely solely on nice happy consolations in their spiritual life. On the other hand, I know many charismatics who are quite well-schooled in the Ignatian exercises, as well as his rules for the discernment of spirits. (I’m thinking primarily of his first set of 14 rules here for use in the first week of the Spiritual Exercises.)
No disrespect meant of course, but it’s an oversimplification to suggest that all charismatics are solely concerned about receiving consolations in prayer. That mentality is common among almost all beginners in the spiritual life, whether the person considers him or herself “charismatic” or not.
As I said above, I would argue that anyone who takes his or her faith seriously is “charismatic,” including Ignatius, Francis, John of the Cross, Teresa of Avila, etcetera. Being charismatic can find outward expression in the nine charismatic gifts, but it’s more an internal disposition of recognizing that we are A) children of God, B) redeemed by Him, and C) that the Holy Spirit dwells within us. It’s a sad state of affairs that has so distorted authentic movements of the Holy Spirit as to convince so many that they are not of God, or are somehow opposed to authentic liturgical worship. Such is surely not the work of the good spirit (to paraphrase Ignatius’ rules).
Edit I should have an addendum. Yes, in common, everyday parlance, “charismatic” refers to people who are particularly open to, and manifest, the nine charismatic gifts of the Holy Spirit.