Hi there...some questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrWizard
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi Mr. Wizard,
I’ll through in my two cents for what it is worth.
QUOTE=MrWizard;8490164]
Ok so now some questions…I get the whole “sex outside of marriage is a sin” thing but what “homosexual acts” constitute as a sin? Example…If I were to date a guy would kissing or hugging or holding hands be constituted as a sin? Or would the fact I’d be dating a guy would be the sin? From my viewpoint since they are not sins for heterosexuals why would they be sins for a homosexual couple? But I’ll let you answer…I love hearing other people’s thoughts. By the way I’ve never dated a guy (only girls) but I might as well have the info handy.
THis is a little bit of a loaded question and really stems from where you are coming from. Holding a guys hand in a nonsexual manner no, kissing a guy on the cheek in a nonsesual manner no those would not be sins – in some cases those are even cultural things that people do. However, when you move it to an amourous state where you have intention of the person of the same sex being your partner then I think you do cross the line over into sinning because at that point you are making your will and desires paramount to what Gods will has revealed to you. You are basically scoffing at God’s plan in the way that he ordered his creations. You may say but I was created that way and I would agree with you that is mostly true. However, Christianty is a religion of love but also of burden and suffering. God may be making this your “cross” to bear and how you respond to it becomes an excersize in your free will. Remember he asks for sacrfices from all of us including his own priests. Do you not think that it would be natural for most of the Latin Rite priest to also want to have familes and be married? Yet they choose to sacrifice their will to serve God. Could it be that your situation is not so different?
Now marriage…homosexual couples can not produce a child therfore the relationship isn’t valid like a heterosexual one. However knowingly infertile AND older heterosexuals can get married but…they can’t produce children either.
In my opinion I think you are missing the point. Yes the main purpose of getting married is to propagate life. But it is also an ordainded sacrament between a man and a woman. However, infertility does not void a marriage because the couple is still open to life. Meaning that however improbable the odds of conception may be, a man and a women can still potentially produce life. However, with a homosexual couple that can never be the case unless by completely unnatural means. Therefore there is no contradiction.
Now I’m assuming some answers will be “natural law”…well humans were created by God as a superior being to all the other creatures on the planet…so in that case humans are not bound by nature in the same way…yet another contradiction. If humans were created based on natural law we would run off instincts not free will and choice.
Here I don’t think you have quite and understanding of what natural law is. Natural law is not innate animal instincts. For instance here is how the CCC puts it

"1954 Man participates in the wisdom and goodness of the Creator who gives him mastery over his acts and the ability to govern himself with a view to the true and the good. **The natural law expresses the original moral sense **which enables man to discern by reason the good and the evil, the truth and the lie:
The natural law is written and engraved in the soul of each and every man, because it is human reason ordaining him to do good and forbidding him to sin . . . But this command of human reason would not have the force of law if it were not the voice and interpreter of a higher reason to which our spirit and our freedom must be submitted.5 "

Since only man really has a moral self, this is what helps separate ourselves from the animals. We have a God given innate ability (seemingly most of us anyway) to know what is right and wrong. It this right and wrong “instinct” not animalist desires which is the moral law. You have the choice on wether to listen to and obey what is written in your heart or ignore it. It is not a primal urge like to breath or to eat. And again it is an excersize in free will.
Lastly I just want to know why some passages of the bible, especially the ones about homosexuality are kept in effect when ones in the same book say that stoning someone is ok.
I am not an apologist so I can only tell you my opinion but I think it is really more of the times that were being lived in. Things like that were either used by God for a purpose or misused by man for their own end ( I think option two) and in anycase have outlived whatever purpose they were meant for. As such they are subject to change, although have they really when you consider we still have capital punishment in the form of Gas Chambers and electric chairs. However divinly revealed laws such as the stance on homosexuality will never be able to be changed asit is the revealed will of God.

Just to let you know, I do have many homosexual friends. They know my stance. I don’t condemn them because that is not my place. I try to do what God does Love the sinner hate the sin. And that can apply to all of us. That doesn’t mean that I have to curb my opinions on the matter though.

Hope this helps.
 
Thanks for the replies you guys! I’ll spend some time thinking and praying over this.

Just to let you guys know I didn’t join to cause trouble…just to state my opinions and see the responses.

Again thanks!
 
Do you know him better than he knows himself?
Does your doctor knows your liver, lungs, bones, muscles, brain, arteries better than yourself ? Of course, not. You know your body much better than your doctor because it is YOUR body. What the doctor knows better it is HIS body only and better to stick to his body and give no sentences about other people’s body.
 
I agree to an extent. I see sexuality as a spectrum…it can change over time. I may have rushed it but my friends really don’t care so in a way it’s no big deal. I spent 5 months in a dark place thinking about it. I’m happy knowing I don’t have to bottle things up anymore and I can be who I am. I still have challenges but now it’s easier. I’ve really thought this through.
I think sexuality is a part of the Human Character. If you are not well, sometimes your sexuality resents. I am an optimist. A doctor in a conference explained to us the first 2 years of the baby and the development and enumerate more than 20 steps. In any step, something may be wrong and influence the whole life. All of a sudden I realizedthat we know nothing about the human inconscient. Pychiatrics is in its infancy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top