Awwww so that’s why I usually don’t support Republicans, Lily. LOL I’m only 2 of those 3.
And anyway anytime the wealthy get breaks from Republicans. I don’t see the trickle down effect on others. At least not much ever trickled down of a positive nature that I could see.And all that only in a wk or so.
Plus there’s the fact that Cruz beats Trump in head to head matchups (but don’t expect to hear about that on the news!)
So I take it you don’t buy Kasich’s argument that he is the only one who can beat Hillary.
Not really. Cruz’s reputation as a faithful family man is more or less ruined now as CNN covers the Trump scandals and the Cruz scandals, but I haven’t heard much on CNN about the scandalous comments that Bill’s ex girlfriend, Sally Miller, has made about Hillary.
Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Warren Buffet, Steve Jobs, Michael Moore and Bill Clinton are clearly not republicans.
So now it doesn’t matter what the link provided says?
Sorry, but McCarthy doesn’t speak for the party or for Trey Gowdy’s committee.
Yes, but that does not excuse what happened with Benghazi.
She did a terrible job. Our Allies don’t trust us, and our enemies are emboldened
Kevin McCarthy is one person and wasn’t involved in the investigation and doesn’t speak for the GOP.
That’s a false statement circulating the internet. The fact is those people who died were not American citizens and were not the responsibility of the US government.
I’m reluctant to speak off topic, but that is a complete load. Abortion isn’t a religious question.
Try telling that to the Dems who think that even though I support Cruz, my Y chromosome will make me vote for Trump instead.Awwww so that’s why I usually don’t support Republicans, Lily. LOL I’m only 2 of those 3.
Well, no I do not. A Cruz win would not be a certainty, of course, but he would have a good chance (just like Kasich would if he could win the nomination).
Oh really? Are murder, rape, assault, theft and fraud religious questions?
That’s why I said “usually.”
Well, it’s still devolving. Give it time!
I think you hit the nail on the head. As I said on another thread,
So the statement in question, about “Catholic women being able to choose not to have abortions” isn’t much different than speaking of “Catholics being able to choose not to commit fraud” – i.e. it’s equally ridiculous.Peter_J said:
Kasich beats Hillary in the polls I have seenWell, no I do not. A Cruz win would not be a certainty, of course, but he would have a good chance (just like Kasich would if he could win the nomination).
I agree that Kasich would be the toughest candidate for Hillary to defeat in November. I don’t really trust what any of the polls have to say about November when we don’t even know who the two main candidates will be yet, but Kasich is running as a moderate with strong financial experience - that is, imho, more appealing to the nation at large than what Trump and Cruz are selling.
I realize everybody says this, but in truth it’s too early to do much more than wildly speculate. I, too, would like to see Kasich in the oval office, but that really doesn’t seem likely at this point. But neither do we really know what Trump or Cruz will be like once they “pivot” to the general election contest or perhaps even before. Those of us who think we know those two might get mightily surprised between now and November. Since both would have to seek a broader appeal than the one that has so far gotten them where they are, I think some surprises are almost a given.
I’d say his life was ruined because they blamed him, but they rooted around and found other charges to put him behind bars. Pretty smarmy of Obama.